Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Though the Toronto Blue Jays general manager would prefer not to sign players to contracts of more than five years, he has the flexibility to do so.

 

“We’ve said ‘six, will you bend a little,’ I think we haven’t ruled it out,” Anthopoulos said Tuesday. “Our preference is certainly five. We’ve never had to deviate from that.”

 

That flexibility could provide Anthopoulos with an edge should he decide to bid aggressively for top free agents or pursue Masahiro Tanaka, the 25-year-old Japanese ace who’s expected to be made available to MLB teams.

Posted
He's always keeping everything hidden and up his sleeve and this he lets out. How good of an idea is it to let guys like Garza know that you're suddenly flexible about your 5-year limit. It looks a lot better to them when you're talking to them and bring it up at that point "well look, we usually don't do this, but we like you so much that we're willing to add a 6th year".
Posted
He's always keeping everything hidden and up his sleeve and this he lets out. How good of an idea is it to let guys like Garza know that you're suddenly flexible about your 5-year limit. It looks a lot better to them when you're talking to them and bring it up at that point "well look, we usually don't do this, but we like you so much that we're willing to add a 6th year".

 

What makes you think he hasn't already?

Posted
What makes you think he hasn't already?

 

Nothing really, he could have. I just see a 6th year for him being the thing that seals a deal. Sort of like "fine we'll give in for a 6th year if it gets a deal done now". I don't expect him to be leaving an offer like that out on the table especially when it's an exception to everything him and Beeston have ever said in the past.

Posted
Nothing really, he could have. I just see a 6th year for him being the thing that seals a deal. Sort of like "fine we'll give in for a 6th year if it gets a deal done now". I don't expect him to be leaving an offer like that out on the table especially when it's an exception to everything him and Beeston have ever said in the past.

 

Perhaps, but he's pretty careful with his wording, and he said "We've said 'six, will you bend a little' ". Unless there's more that wasn't included, it suggests he already has broached that subject with a FA.

 

Actually, further down in the article it suggests they may have last year, although it's not clear whether it was an internal discussion or one with the agent.

Posted
Why would he say this now? There's no one worth more than 5 years left. Cano and Ellsbury are already signed. Only plausible one is Choo. He should have been flexible with Sanchez.

 

Choo and Tanaka is who I'm thinking

Posted
Why would he say this now? There's no one worth more than 5 years left. Cano and Ellsbury are already signed. Only plausible one is Choo. He should have been flexible with Sanchez.

 

Could be referring to trading and signing an extension? Either than or he is considering signing someone to an ill advised contract.

Posted
STOP WITH CHOO!!!!!!!!!

seriously

 

Reyes

Lawrie

Bautista

Edwin

Choo

Rasmus

Melky/Lind

Infante?

Navarro

 

One can dream..

Posted
This is what I'm thinking Vik, along those lines anyhow.

 

In either case, he needs to get something done before the market completely dries up.

Posted
Dream all you want a Boras deal will never come to fruition in Toronto.

 

no top FA will be joining the jays this off season unless AA can get more than one agreeing as long as the other one agrees to a deal. the jays are too many moves from being a playoff team and top FA will only go for money AA isn't willing to pay or a team that is heading to the playoffs.

 

last years moves left the team farther away from the playoffs and with half the farm they had before last off season.

Posted
C'mon man.......I'm talking about Boras

 

he's an *******, but he's not the only one and I dont see much out there that is worth 5 years. the FA market is pretty bad this year. the few top players who are out there are asking ridiculous money + years that dont make sense. not that making sense is AA's strong side.

 

AA needs to make a couple of shrewd moves and the team has to have a lot of things fall their way for this next season to not be heart breaking. AA could empty the farm and still only have a 75 win team.

Posted
FanGraphs adjusting playing time says 9th at 85-77.

 

I still think one of you should do a blog post listing the various talked about targets (FA and trade) and what each would do to our projections.

Posted
BORAS AND BEESTON DON'T DEAL

 

 

cap filler

 

never said any different. not sure why you are trying to make the point when I already agree with you? lol

Posted
Like BTS did with Infante, Ellis, and Phillips?

 

I don't remember seeing that (maybe it was when I wasn't feeling well), but yes, especially focusing on the pitchers.

Posted

Here's a quote from AA on the 5-year thing:

 

“We’ll offer more money with a larger average annual salary but we won’t go over five years,” said Anthopoulos. “We think five is long enough. A representative for a free agent came to us proposing a five-year deal. He signed elsewhere for a longer term.”

 

Anthopoulos pointed out how the Los Angeles Dodgers offered Rafael Furcal a three-year deal averaging $11 million which he took rather a five-year deal averaging $9 million from the Chicago Cubs.

 

And how Shane Victorino turned down a four-year salary averaging $11 million to sign a three-year with the Boston Red Sox for a package of $13 million per year.

 

“Some guys will sign a short deal to get back into the market place ... as long as it’s not their last contract,” said Anthopoulos. “On a short deal they can come out and perform and re-enter. Cliff Lee took less to sign with the Philadelphia Phillies (the New York Yankees and Texas Rangers made larger offers).

 

“Who figured Carlos Beltran would sign a three-year deal at age 36 or Tim Hudson would do a two-year deal at 39.”

 

 

Thread closed.

Posted
This board is so bi-polar. The farm is not "sexy", but there's talent there. Also, we're not "A LOT" of moves away. I'm as cynical as anyone on this board, but seriously, if AA just reverted back to the AA he was when he first started as GM, and made let's say 2 really smart moves, we're in this thing again barring injuries.
Posted

Only guys I would give more than 5 years is Cano, Ellsbury, or Choo. Not even Tanaka, he isn't Yu.

 

I would do somethig like 6/110 for Choo. I never really followed the Jay/SB issues..but Apparently they don't deal with him I guess

Posted
I still feel.that without a solid FA signing that he won't be able to make the team significantly better. Most trades he can make will leave a hole elsewhere. Prob is half the quality free agents are now gone.
Posted
And Choo will never come here, Boras.

 

Care to post his career splits? I would but on plane about to take off.

 

wRC+ L Vs R

2010 - 91 - 173

2011 - 97 - 111

2012 - 78 - 160

2013 - 81 - 183

 

Below avg Vs stud

Posted
Boras represents high priced free agents... Blue Jays don't like to sign high priced free agents.

 

That's true but you can't deny that there was a tryst between Boras and Beeston around Paxton. Maybe that's still a factor, maybe it isn't. We won't really know until the Jays sign one of his players but until then the speculation is hardly baseless.

Posted
Boras has already said many times he doesn't have a problem with the Blue Jays. This is dumb. It's purely coincidence at this point. Boras represents high priced free agents... Blue Jays don't like to sign high priced free agents.

 

I agree. These guys are running a billion dollar company, there's no room for pettiness. I'm sure the team knows if it wants a player and what they are willing to max out at. That's common sense anyway.. Who knows though

Posted (edited)
I think Paxton is the one who had the issue with the Blue Jays. And Beeston wasn't even with the organization at the time. Boras was on the radio earlier this year he addressed all this. He has no problem making deals with the Blue Jays. This is all in peoples heads.

 

Check your history. Beeston was around before AA became GM. He was interim President looking for his replacement and handling some negotiations. He's literally the one who caused the Paxton situation by leaking Boras' involvment to the media.

 

As far as Boras is concerned, there's no reason for him to broadcast a tryst with the Jays if there is one. If nothing else, he can use hypothetical Jays interest as leverage. He certainly isn't smarting from the Paxton situation as much as Paxton himself but that doesn't mean he's keen to talk to the Jays or that the Jays are keen to talk to him.

 

Maybe the Jays and Boras are just ships in night who just don't have a convergence of interests right now. That's not an unfair speculation but the fact remains that the last time Beeston and Boras spoke it went pretty damn poorly, Neither side got what they wanted and the player ended up having to spend a season without MLB or NCAA eligibility. At that point it was the first time in years that the Jays had taken a Boras client and there haven't been any since.

 

This is all in peoples heads.

 

Pretty easy to say when you're account of Beeston and Boras's history isn't even acurate.

Edited by KingKat

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...