Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Carlos Danger

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    8,448

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospect Rankings

Toronto Blue Jays Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Toronto Blue Jays Fan Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Toronto Blue Jays News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Carlos Danger

  1. Carlos Danger
    They have interviewed former presidents of orgs who came from the baseball side, as did Shapiro. Across the board they will say that if you think that the President is not involved in baseball decision/personnel decisions etc you are dead wrong. 100% Shapiro is involved in on field product.
  2. Carlos Danger
    There are two components to both though. The mechanics of pitching and hitting, not a zone for nerds unless former player/nerds. Then you have the pitch selection or sequence aspect, that is the Nerd zone. Both sides need to have a symbiotic relationship. It appears that on our pitching side, that is the case, and on our hitting side, it is not.
  3. Carlos Danger
    We could have offered a higher 1 yr deal if that was the case.
  4. Carlos Danger
    He is not even responsible for Varsho. According to Blair and Barker today, it is because Varsho’s dad got involved. The improvement stems from his dad.
  5. Carlos Danger
    Never mind, I just saw the replay.
  6. Carlos Danger
    What happened, not able to watch yet?
  7. Carlos Danger
    I would say no to that if I owned Riley and Royce. However, full disclosure I have VDS.
  8. Carlos Danger
    It is apparent you have no idea the situation and context I am referring to. You do that s*** when you hit a tying or go ahead or winning hit or HR. Not when your team is down 7, 8 runs late and it is the first and only run you have scored. Situational awareness.
  9. Carlos Danger
    It’s not the fact he did it. We were down biggly. Not appropriate for the situation, regardless of who they were playing.
  10. Carlos Danger
    This. I noted this over the weekend. Dude is just not sustainable as a full time catcher, nor do I believe long term. i.e, no 10 yr contracts.
  11. Carlos Danger
    Unfortunately probably the case. Certainly doesn't know how to read the room and have much of an appreciation of historical what not to do after he Shhsssssssedd the Yankees fanbase after hitting a HR in a game we were down by like 8. For those of you who do not have access to U.S media other than the few big ones. Vlad was absolutely roasted for that and not just by the Yankees' media and fanbase.
  12. Carlos Danger
    Holy heart palpitation.
  13. Carlos Danger
    Muncy is clutch… Not a good feeling..
  14. Carlos Danger
    Makes it even a worse decision, since Kikuchi was coming out of the pen (he was not accustomed to last year) and struggled somewhat the later part of the year.
  15. Carlos Danger
    I hope Emily is eventually going to phase out Hazel.
  16. Carlos Danger
  17. Carlos Danger
    Varsho made up for the blip yesterday on D.
  18. Carlos Danger
    We have just been facing some tough bullpens..
  19. Carlos Danger
    I see this is what some random poster from some small town in rural Ontario resorts to when they are having a meltdown. Consistently proven to be the most clueless poster on how to build a winning baseball team and assess statistics based on context on this board. Not kidding or using hyperbole when I say, probably the worst assessor of talent on the board. Taking the L is hard, week after week, year after year. Get off your high horse to think you speak for the board. Your posts reek of arrogance which you have shown zero, zero, historical relevance in your posting, to merit your authoritarian attitude. Seek assistance from a mental health professional for your outbursts, for the sake of your family. You were much more carefree in Spring Training when in Florida. Maybe a vacation would help.
  20. Carlos Danger
    Just clarifying. You determine who we (the board) want here?
  21. Carlos Danger
    If we are going to pick one off, Stone is probably one of the most vulnerable.
  22. Carlos Danger
    I heard there is a reservation for 50 at a sushi restaurant later tonight!
  23. Carlos Danger
    This part makes it even worse, since some teams do have ownership issues that curtail the FO. I am not aware of ownership curtailing the Jays lateley. We are thought to be in this company. Did not receive votes: Red Sox, Blue Jays, Royals, White Sox, Athletics, Angels, Nationals, Marlins, Cardinals, Padres, Rockies, Giants, Pirates, Cubs One executive summed up the ephemeral nature of this endeavor: “Is Oakland terrible? Five years ago, they were top five. Is that them, or what they’re dealing with?” Indeed, for many of the clubs that did not merit consideration, it is hard to separate the front office from the sway held by ownership. One of the primary responsibilities of a chief baseball executive is managing upward — getting your owner to buy into, both literally and figuratively, your vision for how to run a club. Some owners are more difficult to sway than others.
  24. Carlos Danger
    There are 16 Team FOs that received votes on there. The Blue Jays did not get one, not one. There are 30 teams. 40 execs means more than one per team in some cases in aggregate. What are you guys going on about top 5 for ....? As much as I do not like the Athletic sometimes, they are a reputable source. This is not a fan or media vote. This is a peer vote. It says something...... What this tells me, is that it is not just the "haters'' on message boards or negative Nancy who question the FOs decisions and strategies. It is also industry peers.
  25. Carlos Danger
    How’s it fake news Spank? There are more than 5 FOs and 40 execs.
×
×
  • Create New...