Gibbons goes by the same old school thinking of the 8th inning reliever has to pitch in the 8th inning regardless of the situation. He doesn't believe in the theory that when a starter is facing a team the 3rd or 4th time through the order that the starter is less likely to perform at a high level. He couldn't tell you who his best relievers or worst relievers are because he uses them based on gut instead of performance (hence why Sanchez, Hawkins, Schultz, Tepera, Loup, etc, are or were all ahead of Hendriks, Cecil, and Lowe in his depth chart). He couldn't care less about defence as witnessed by the video game lineups he put out early in the season, focusing on getting the best bats in the lineup rather than saving runs on the other end.
He is 100% an old school manager. Maybe not identical to Cito or Farrell, but not exactly the opposite either. If you want forward thinking, looking at guys like Cash in Tampa, or Girardi, and so on. The difference between managers like that and Gibbons are far more noticable than the difference between Cito/Farrell and Gibbons. So if you're going to bash Cito/Farrell, then make some room for Gibbons on the hate train.