Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

glory

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    15,131
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospect Rankings

Toronto Blue Jays Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Toronto Blue Jays Fan Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Toronto Blue Jays News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by glory

  1. The Guardians have signed Zunino for 1/6. Cross them off the catcher list.
  2. From Davidi's latest article:
  3. Would have been nice if the A's had a good young left handed hitting CF with a few years of control left. Could have gotten him for Otto Lopez, Hayden Juenger, and Mitch White rather than signing Kiermaier.
  4. Based on earlier rumors, the Astros, Guardians, and Cubs are probably the most likely suitors. D-Backs probably won't make a deal for Jansen, and not sure if the Padres are a match trade-wise even though they have a clear need.
  5. Vazquez is the last obstacle in the way of the Jays catcher trade, so hopefully he signs tonight and gets it over with. Edit: Vazquez going to the Twins.
  6. So they covered CF and SP. They could use another SP to push Kikuchi to the pen, but a bat is probably a bigger need now (Conforto, Brantley, trade, etc).
  7. Bassitt rejected the QO so the Jays will lose a pick and some international money, but getting a quality SP on a 3 year deal in this market is a nice piece of business.
  8. This would make more sense as opposed to the Braves getting Murphy and holding on to 3 catchers.
  9. Murphy will take one look into AA's eyes and sign his prime away for nothing. Let's see if this trade finally opens up a path to a Jays/catcher trade.
  10. Yeah, one of Conforto/Brantley replacing Hernandez and KK essentially replacing Tapia would be a net positive and add much needed balance to the lineup. Only downside would be having to look for either 2-3 outfielders next winter (depending on the length of KK's deal) but I guess cross that bridge when you get there.
  11. I'd be surprised if it were a straight one year deal given that the Dodgers were apparently interested as well. Maybe the Jays promised more playing time, or he saw a path to more playing time in Toronto. Ideally for the Jays it would be one year + a team option with a buyout, because as fringey as Kiermaier is, the Jays kind of need outfielders beyond 2023 as well. Either way, as credible as "Damon" is, I'll wait for more of an official announcement.
  12. We usually do see terms of a deal reported even during “pending physical” stage. Surprised we haven’t even heard about the years on the deal yet.
  13. Yeah I actually thought the Jays would get Kepler before the KK signing. I guess they still can get him if they think his bat has potential to improve, but after KK I think the team needs a LH bat that can hit closer to the top of the order. Conforto and Brantley are probably the best fits in that regard, although if Brantley needs to DH most of the time then he may not be the best roster fit unless Kirk is traded.
  14. I’d be shocked if the Jays didn’t add another outfielder, either in free agency or trade. Conforto makes a lot of sense in free agency. Not sure about the trade market. Jansen for Happ would be fine as a 2023 swap but the Cubs would have to add something for the one fewer year of control.
  15. I'm not the biggest fan of adding Kiermaier, but the Jays really needed an OF that is controllable after 2023. Conforto is signing a one year deal, Bellinger already did, Brantley probably won't get more than one year due to age/injury, and Gallo was horseshit last season so no one is signing him to more than one year. I don't see the team trading Kirk or Moreno, and no team is trading a highly controllable LH CF for Jansen. The options were very limited. I was actually warming up to the idea of signing Nimmo but that's when I thought it would take a 6 year deal. Trying to beat an 8 year deal would have been insane. So KK on a 2+1 deal is more reasonable, not in a general sense, but for the Jays specifically. They only had Springer who was controlled after 2023, and their 2 best OF prospects in the minors are in A ball (with arguably the best one of the two just exposed in the Rule 5). This is more of an indictment of how bad the Jays OF situation is than anything else.
  16. Yeah this move improves the team defensively but adding another bat that can hit towards the top/middle of the order is necessary. Either Conforto or Brantley next would be ideal. Then trade Jansen for the best SP you can get.
  17. The Dodgers were after Kiermaier as well, so I think it's probably going to end up a 2 year deal.
  18. I'll wait for the terms of the deal to come out before giving full thoughts, but no chance he was signed here to be a 4th OF. He's starting in CF against RHP at a minimum, and the Jays have Merrifield who can cover the other side of the platoon in CF.
  19. Jays have signed Kiermaier according to Davidi.
  20. The team that gives him 7 years will get him but I don’t think any team will. Then again teams nowadays seem fine with giving more years and having dead money at the end of contracts if it lowers the AAV and lessens the CBT hit, so maybe he will get 7 at a lower AAV. I think there’s enough demand for him that he will get at least 6.
  21. Syndergaard might be an interesting target. From an article by Passan recently: “No longer able to reach 100 mph as he did regularly early in his career, Syndergaard this winter is relying on data to improve his mechanics and refine his pitches after visits to Driveline and Tread Athletics, two noted pitching factories.” His velocity dropped to 94 and he couldn't strike hitters out anymore but was still a 2 WAR SP. I'm not sure how much upside there is there, but even if he's the 2022 version going forward, he's still a decent 4/5 starter. At least he's a lot more intriguing than Kyle Gibson. Rodon would obviously be ideal and Senga would be a nice gamble as well, but don't see the Jays winning either of those two battles. It's either going to be a trade or signing a #4 starter in free agency.
  22. 8 years for Nimmo, no thanks.
  23. Agreed. Contending teams need players like Espinal. Essentially a 2 WAR backup who can cover multiple positions (including SS which no one else on the roster can do at the moment), hit LHP, and won't complain about being a bench player. As long as he's cheap, he's a good guy to have around. That doesn't mean you don't trade him if the return warrants it, but chances are he'll have more value to the team than he'd have in a trade anyway.
  24. If the Brewers would do it, then that would be a nice little deal. A LHH CF who can field, run, and hit (based on his prospects page) is exactly what the Jays need. Not much power from the looks of it, but offensive profile looks pretty safe otherwise. Would save the team some money to improve the rotation and add another bat as well. Little risky going with a CF with no MLB experience, and at the same time expecting Moreno to do things as well, so only reason the Jays may not do it is they'd want a more established player, but from a team building and asset standpoint, it's the type of deal the Jays need.
×
×
  • Create New...