Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

glory

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    14,711
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by glory

  1. If the Angels sell, then Syndergaard seems like he would be a possibility. He’s lost about 3-5 mph so he’s not the same guy but probably still good enough to slot in the bottom end of the rotation (behind Manoah, Gausman, and hopefully an improved Berrios) and shouldn’t cost much. As far as the relievers, look for any relievers with walk issues and hard contact issues but still strike guys out. Atkins loves those buy low types.
  2. Yeah I think we underrate the level of risk involved in the Springer/Gausman/Berrios contracts. There’s real decline potential there in the latter parts of those deals, and if the team is not developing the next Vlad/Kirk/Bo/etc by 2025 then it’s going to be tough to create the sustainable winner they always talk about once Vlad/Bo are either extended or leave. That’s not even factoring the lack of pitching development (aside from Manoah) that hasn’t gotten better over time. With that said, I agree with not going to all in this deadline. They are not catching the Yankees, and really only have 1, maybe 2, threats to their WC spot (Mariners and maybe CLE since they play in a s*** division). Do enough to get a WC spot and then hope Manoah/Gausman/Berrios can get you to the DS. After that it’s a crapshoot.
  3. That's the scary part here. When the Jays were a few games above .500 around the deadline last year they had like a +100 run differential and weren't even allowed to play home games for the first 4 months of the season. You could at least argue that they were grossly underachieving and a 2nd half run like they had was possible. The current team is playing about to their expected levels, and now have injuries/ineffectiveness which is exposing their biggest weaknesses (SP depth and relievers). They'll need a bunch of reinforcements at the deadline, and need to start getting serious here. If they want to be cute and give 500 PA's to Tapia because they want to develop his bat, or calling up scrub after scrub to pitch out of the pen, then be prepared for these results.
  4. Eh, they've been bad for years, but they are still future hall of famers, and they won't be taking a spot from anyone. I don't see an issue with celebrating their careers, although I don't think Cabrera is retiring after this season, so they should have waited until next year's AS game for him.
  5. I really don’t care about Trout (he signed that long ass extension knowing they were a dumpster fire so that’s on him), but I hope Ohtani is smart enough to get out of there when he’s a FA. I’d prefer if the Angels traded him this month to jump start the much needed tear down but I have a feeling they are going to milk this for as long as they can. We as baseball fans just have to hope Ohtani doesn’t take an extension before he has a chance to test the market.
  6. The White Sox and Guardians are in the s***** AL Central, so I guess we can't rule them out as being able to go on a run. The Mariners are in a division with one great team and mediocrity/bad everywhere else. The M's have been on a roll, have good SP/RP, and Julio Rodriguez is a beast. A week or two ago I would have said the Jays were a playoff lock, and maybe they still are to some degree, but it doesn't look like a certainty right now. This isn't an underachieving team with a +100 run differential like last season. They are pretty much where they should be from the looks of it, if not a bit lucky (though schedule has been tough). The Jays only have 3 years with Vlad after this one. They already wasted an opportunity last season. They can't waste anymore.
  7. Yeah, Charlie's only/main skill seems to be dealing with players (it's certainly not in-game stuff), so for him to make that quote about Kikuchi is pretty alarming. Although to be fair, it's infuriating as a fan to watch Kikuchi when he's not on, so I can imagine it being a lot worse in the field and dugout when you're playing behind him. As far as Biggio, it seems the organization (Charlie plus everyone else) thinks that Tapia has more potential. The most logical thing to do, especially when he's on a hot streak, is to play Biggio everyday all over the field. That's really the only way this "we need to DH regulars everyday" concept makes any sense, when you plug a good player into different spots so the regular can DH. For them to be using that on a -0.6 WAR player instead is baffling. It's something bad organizations do, not what the Jays should be doing. The Jays are in a playoff spot, and probably will get a WC spot when all is said and done (unless the Mariners go crazy in the 2nd half.....can't see anyone else as a threat), but man is this team flawed and not fun to watch right now. Although this could work out in the end if they hold on to the 3rd WC spot at the end of the season and face the Twins in the WC round instead of Red Sox/Rays.
  8. glory

    NBA Thread

    The Raptors definitely benefitted from Siakam's development in 2018-19, but Kawhi was a one year rental for a mostly veteran team who had been good for many years but could never get over the hump. It was either continue being a 2nd round team until contracts ran out or go for the home run trade when it became available. That trade fit the timeline for that particular group. If you add Durant, then yes you have him for 4 years (unless he demands a trade after 1), but he's also on the back end of his prime/career. So if Barnes doesn't really take off until year 3 or 4, then KD is kinda wasted here because you can't maximize his best remaining years. The only way for a KD trade to make sense is if they can keep Barnes and Siakam (to a lesser degree FVV as well but I'd be fine if he had to be moved). I'm also a little iffy on OG being able to take the next step. He's a very good two way 3+D player, but he can't create his own offense consistently and that's going to put a ceiling on him. The difference between him and Siakam is pretty significant, IMO. I'm more bullish on Achiuwa turning into something given his defense and improving ability to hit 3's. A center who can guard multiple positions and spread the floor on offense is a huge luxury. A lineup of FVV/Barnes/KD/Siakam/Achiuwa is a title contender. Probably the best team in the East one through five. IMO either find a way to get KD with OG/Trent as the main pieces (with picks, etc, attached) or keep the status quo.
  9. glory

    NBA Thread

    I think the difference is that DeRozan was vastly overrated as a player, and wasn’t a great defensive player. Getting Kawhi and Green for essentially him and a backup center was a heist. In this case, Siakam is actually a very good two way player. He’s not easy to replace because of his defensive ability, and he’s already proven he can be the 3rd guy on a championship team (played closer to a 2nd guy in the Finals). Replacing Siakam with KD is a clear upgrade but I think they’d miss Siakam enough to where it would hurt them a bit. Durant with Siakam and Barnes still here is a title contender. Without Siakam it would still be a really good team but a lot would be riding on Scottie’s development.
  10. glory

    NBA Thread

    The only way adding Durant makes sense is if the rest of the roster is good enough with him to win a championship. That won't be the case if Siakam goes the other way (I won't even talk about Barnes since there's likely no chance the Raptors trade him). My guess is KD would want to come to a team with Siakam, Barnes, and Fred on it. Not sure the Nets would take OG, Trent, and a bunch of picks, but I don't see the Raptors offering much more than that. KD has 4 years of control but those years mean nothing. He can demand a trade in 6 months and he'll be gone. That's just the way the NBA works. Getting KD is not the important part of this, it's getting KD and being good enough to compete for championships that is the key here.
  11. The Jays want to give DH days to Springer, Vlad, Hernandez, and Gurriel every week. With Springer it’s understandable but they use the other guys as if they are in their 30’s. Again, broken record, but if this is the way they want to use DH then it’s bordering irresponsible to hoard all the catchers when it’s leading to 500 Tapia plate appearances. Just trade Moreno for Bryan Reynolds or something and fix this s***.
  12. Yeah it looks that way. Pitching depth in the upper minors is ass, and the only position player that can help from the upper minors happens to play a position that the Jays are practically elite at without him. This season and next season is probably going to be on the back of whatever big league moves Atkins can make. It's not going to come from the system.
  13. Why the hell would they use Castillo a day before a double header with Hatch pitching one of the games? Biggio better play more than Tapia going forward.
  14. Chapman is so good defensively.
  15. I’m legit surprised Romo wasn’t brought in yet.
  16. Yeah they need a SP and about 2 high leverage (high velo) bullpen arms. They should also look to upgrade on Tapia as far as a LH OF (especially since the team/Buntoyo don’t like playing 2 catchers together often), but they can probably get by with the offense for the most part. It’s the pen that’s going to hurt them.
  17. If the Jays are leading by 2-3 in the 8th inning tonight, Romo will be in. Charlie sees vetrins and gets giddy.
  18. I wouldn’t mind it as much if it wasn’t a cheap attempt to get Tapia into the lineup. At this point the Jays deserve what they get. If they want to keep 3 catchers but only play 1 of them at a time because they want a -1.0 WAR player getting 500 PA’s this year instead, then take the negative value that comes with it.
  19. Pretty much. They thought they could fix him and turn him into a much better SP. A team looking for a gamble on a 5th starter signs him to a one year deal. Jays liked him enough to go longer. So far it hasn’t worked. Walker has some work to do.
  20. He’s already the set up man. Proven closer in this league. Brad Hand 2.0. Just in time to blow a game or two against the Red Sox.
  21. I feel like there’s a good chance we see a Yankees/Astros ALCS. Obviously it’s baseball so anything can happen but those two teams seem on a different level than everyone else.
  22. glory

    NBA Thread

    Really depends on what is available at 7. OG is a really good two way player but he's likely never going to be much more than what he already is. If they feel they can get a player with higher upside at 7, plus someone like Josh Hart and/or other pieces, then I could see the logic behind it. My guess is the Raptors don't do anything on draft day except make the picks they have. That's pretty much what they always do anyway, and i think they like the core group they have assembled (Siakam, Barnes, OG, Fred, Trent, Precious). I think only way they trade OG is if they get a clear upgrade in return.
  23. The only knocks I have heard about Ruth are that he played in an era before integration and the level of competition he faced in general versus what Ohtani faces. I think both are pretty reasonable criticisms without diminishing his accomplishments. That context matters a lot given we are comparing two players nearly 100 years apart.
  24. Jansen only has 2 years of control left after this season, so I think you can rule out any teams either currently rebuilding or planning to rebuild. He's likely more difficult to move for that reason. Any team in any situation would take Kirk or Moreno, but those two are (at least Kirk is) the least likely to be moved right now. Jansen to the Astros would be awful for the Jays since there's a chance of possibly seeing them in the playoffs (3rd WC team has to face the Astros if they advance to DS). Hard to find a good match because the Jays would be trading a big leaguer during a competitive window. Not sure they'd even want prospects for him unless they were ready to contribute right away. If the Jays were going to move Moreno it would have been for someone like Jose Ramirez. I don't think there is a difference making talent that is realistically available right now that they'd move Moreno for, unless Soto or Ohtani suddenly become available in a month.
  25. I think there's a good chance Judge leaves as a FA, but yeah, the Yankees aren't trading him. If they win a World Series and Judge goes elsewhere for way more money, then I think they'll be fine with that, so they are going to go for it all this year. The star player who will be interesting to watch is Ohtani. He's a FA after the 2023 season. If the Angels fall out of by next month (a good possibility since it's the Angels), then they have a real decision to make. Trading him mid season will probably hurt attendance big time for the last 2 months, and they still have next season to take a chance at contending with him, so my guess is they'll keep him at least until trade deadline 2023, but he's a logical guy to move for them from a baseball standpoint (business standpoint might be different). That Rendon contract is hurting them badly.
×
×
  • Create New...