Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

glory

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    15,131
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospect Rankings

Toronto Blue Jays Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Toronto Blue Jays Fan Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Toronto Blue Jays News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by glory

  1. Varsho will definitely be the starting CF in 2024-26. His playing time there in 2023 will depend on a bunch of factors (injuries, performance of KK, etc) but I suspect he will be playing all the OF positions in 2023. If they platoon KK, then Varsho likely plays CF against LHP. On the days Springer is at DH and KK is also in the lineup, then they likely move Varsho to RF. And so on. As far as the trade, as long as Varsho is a 3-4 WAR OF that can cover CF, then I don't think the Jays are going to regret the deal even if Moreno turns into a star. Outfield up and down the organization was a weakness. They needed someone, especially at CF, long term. The fact that they got 4 years of that type of player was definitely worth the gamble, IMO. If Varsho has another gear in him offensively, then even better.
  2. Baseball has lost popularity in the US, but I don't think that's why the WBC is not a big deal to most US fans. Baseball is a regional driven game. Yankees fans will watch Yankees games, but not really care about anything else. I think that applies to most baseball fans. I very rarely come across just "baseball" fans. I come across a lot of basketball fans who don't necessarily root for a team but they'll watch games. In baseball it's "I'm a (insert team) fan" and that's it. The only way the WBC gets viewers in the US is if they can get the 'Merica crowd who wants to see Team USA win for national pride, but I don't think the WBC has that sort of impact on the general audience. If every superstar in MLB competed in this I don't think it would make that big of a difference. Maybe if it was the actual Olympics more people would care. I can't speak on Canada's behalf but I'm sure it's the same there.
  3. Berrios having 6/116 left on his contract is terrifying.
  4. Lopez is probably the better player overall, but he has an option remaining and the last bench is likely to get very limited playing time. Not sure the team would want Lopez to get sporadic playing time when they can still stash him in AAA until a need arises. Bernard's skill set is ideal for a back of the bench role since he has elite sprint speed and can (presumably) cover CF. Basically a RH Zimmer except maybe/possibly/hopefully not complete ass with the bat, and if he's on the bench most of the time, it's not that big of a deal.
  5. Bautista is a no brainer addition. Hard to believe he was on the team for 9.5 years. Didn't feel that long. I would think Encarnacion is next. As for others, I'm iffy on Wells. It wasn't like he was the best of the best like Halladay was. He was a good player in a completely forgettable era of Blue Jays baseball.
  6. 2014-17 Billy Hamilton with these rules would have been fun to watch. Prime Jarrod Dyson too. Not sure if there are many players like that in the league currently. I have no idea who the Jays internally view as the best option for the last bench spot, but curious to see if someone like Wynton Bernard with elite sprint speed gets a much longer look. A late inning guy like him will have value, especially with guys like Belt, Kirk, etc, potentially clogging up bases late in games.
  7. Agreed, although if the pitch clock isn't visible to the TV audience, then I don't even think it will take until June for people not to notice, it might be sometime in April. People in general dislike change, but they'll get used to it. I bring this up a lot, but look at the NBA in the early 2000's and compare it to today. It's like a different game. The NBA had to make rule changes because fans were tuning out of the games that ended with a 79-72 score. Scoring might be a bit absurd today but whatever, it's a more appealing product. In a few years all of these MLB rule changes will be considered normal and no one will long for the days of 4.5 hour games that had 45 seconds of players scratching their balls in between every pitch.
  8. Essentially comes out to 16 years, $500m for Machado counting the first 5 years of his original deal plus this extension. Crazy.
  9. Yeah if they don't strictly enforce it then players won't take it seriously. Get all the BS stuff out of the way in Spring Training so it doesn't bleed over into the regular season.
  10. That was only a few pitches but man that went by quick. Once pitchers/hitters get used to this, there's no doubt it's going to make the pace of play a lot better.
  11. Looking at Orelvis' FG page, it appears ZiPS is projecting a 100 wRC+ and 2.0 WAR for him in 2023, so I would think he's definitely one of the 3.
  12. Pearson needs to be a 1 inning reliever. Maybe stretch him to multi innings occasionally if he’s successful and can handle it but he’s not going to be a SP given his age/injury history and even a bulk reliever is probably asking a lot. I think whatever ceiling he has left is most likely to be reached as a 1 inning RP.
  13. Agreed. As mentioned before, Chapman is a Boras client, so he's not signing an extension either way unless it's for FA type years/money, and that wouldn't make sense for the Jays. It's fine to use him for one year, hope he puts up a 5-6 WAR, and then move on. The key obviously is who replaces him. I think it's too early to give up on Orelvis but no chance I'm counting on him to be ready by 2024 even if he does bounce back, so it's really Barger or trade/free agency.
  14. That model works for the Jays because their core position player pieces are all "cheap", relatively speaking (Vlad, Bo, Kirk, Jansen, now Varsho, previously Teoscar/Gurriel, etc). It's probably a model that is not going to work the closer we get to 2025-26, depending on what happens with Vlad/Bo long term, but it was the right direction to take with the rotation for 2020-25. The alternative would have been doing what the O's are doing now, which is seeing year 1 of Adley's service time already disappear but having no urgency to build a contending rotation around him and Gunnar. They'd rather wait for internal options to start filtering up, and maybe that works eventually, but how long will it take if it does work? Young position players + veteran rotation always seemed like the best direction to go in. It mitigates a lot of injury risk that comes with depending on young pitchers, and potentially expedites the ability to contend. The fact that they were able to get a legit ace with one of those FA contracts (Gausman) was a godsend. Hopefully in the next few years we see more internal development with SPs.
  15. Grossman signed for 1 year, $2m with $3m in potential performance bonuses. Would have fit in nicely with the Jays but based on those terms it looks like path to playing time was a factor in his decision. Looking like one of Lopez, Lukes or Bernard is going to get that final spot on the bench, unless I'm missing someone.
  16. The Jays are going to have to hope someone in the minors that is currently in the fringe category turns into a serviceable SP option. Thompson, Francis, Hatch, etc. Out of that group Thompson might be the most likely given what he did in 2021. The depth might look a little better in the middle of the season with Tiedemann, Zulueta, Robberse, etc, getting closer to the big leagues but with SP prospects there is just too much risk to count on anything (injury, performance, etc).
  17. I think India can grow to be a baseball/MLB market. It's going to take some time/investment, and some representation, but I feel like its similarity to cricket (bat to ball) is probably a good thing. I believe I read that MLB opened an office over there a few years ago so I'm guessing they have started building an infrastructure already. I feel like India and China have real potential to become stronger baseball countries, as well as the UK which they have already gotten into.
  18. Saw this posted yesterday. Curious to see what happens.
  19. I don't know if the focus is to shorten the game time as much as it is to make the games flow better. Without a clock, there's simply no way to control how long a game goes, but a 3 hour game with less dead time in between pitches, more action, etc, is a far better entertainment product. That's the goal. The 3 outcomes that the league wants to increase are triples, doubles, and stolen bases. The bigger bases + cap on pick off attempts helps with the SB's, and I would think the shift ban is going to help with the 2B/3B, or at least BABIP. Combine that with a pitch clock, and I think the games should flow better overall. At least until the Rays find a way to exploit the rule changes. The thing I've noticed watching baseball with casuals/non fans is that the one thing that gets their eyes off the TV screen and onto their phones the fastest is the time in between pitches. The pitch clock is long overdue. If they just did that and kept everything else the same, even that alone would have improved things. I do think the other changes are a positive though. We will see how it looks on the field. I'm guessing there will be an annoying period where there will be excessive balks and automatic balls/strikes due to pitch clock violations. Hopefully that doesn't last long. Most curious to see what the pitch clock does to velocity. I agree, limit the number of pitchers a team can employ and it will make a difference.
  20. Based on the roster as of now (assuming the Jays don't sign Grossman), I think I'd lean towards Bernard too. With the rule changes on pick off attempts, stolen bases are going to go up, so Bernard's speed will come in handy as a pinch runner, and if he's a CF defensively, then he'll obviously have value there as well. Basically a RH version of Zimmer, though hopefully not as helpless at the plate. If he hits his Steamer/ZiPS projection offensively he'd be more than serviceable as a 4th/5th OF, though it seems a little optimistic. Lopez has options, and while I don't think his upside is all that high, the Jays might prefer to have him get regular PA's rather than to sit on the bench as a pinch runner/defensive replacement.
  21. Kikuchi gives up a lot of home runs and hard contact, and now the fences have been brought in a bit. I don't think it's going to end well for him, but maybe there's some Pete Walker magic in there somewhere. I agree it's better to give him a shot to see if he's salvageable in the rotation. Can't turn back time and give him a 1 year deal like he should have gotten last year, so try to make the best of it. Mitch White with better OF defense might be a solid #5 starter/swing man. Either way I hope the top 4 in the rotation are as durable as they appear to be.
×
×
  • Create New...