Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

BTS

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    42,956
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by BTS

  1. I agree with that. I just think that assuming the team made offers in bad faith based on the information available is basically just looking for a way to vent frustration.
  2. So you're annoyed at the idea of another team being willing to offer more money to a free agent than Toronto is. Why would that annoy you? It's how free agency works. You place a value on a player, and hope that you can land him. Sometimes you get your guy: Happ, Estrada, Gurriel, Morales, Pearce. Sometimes you don't: Encarnacion (so far), Fowler, probably many others.
  3. I'm not sure what it is you're upset about. What has the team missed out on? Sale - the team didn't have the assets Eaton - the team probably didn't have the assets Fowler - signed to play CF for a rumoured 80-90M. What would it have cost to get him to play RF on turf? 90M? 100M? Chapman - signed for 86M in a city he's played in and enjoyed. How high would the Yankees have gone? How much would it have cost to bring him here? 100M?
  4. If the whining in this thread is any indication, you're absolutely right. Casual fans don't understand that what was going on under AA was not sustainable, and that maintaining a competitive roster while the old/expensive core hits free agency and/or declines was always going to be extremely difficult. Year 1 of turning the roster over was a resounding success, and I'm loving what I'm seeing so far in year 2.
  5. The Yankees had to re-arm because they did what you're advocating doing and things got so bad that they couldn't even win on a 200M payroll. And the Tigers are two years into what will be at least the better part of a decade of irrelevance thanks to Dombrowski. St. Louis is a good example of a team that's had a lot of success operating in a way that Shapiro has demonstrated that he wants to operate here: make low-risk additions and supplement a home-grown core with low-mid tier short-term free agent deals. They don't want a two-year window. They want to compete every year. And a 160M payroll is enough to do it if they don't make irrational free agent mistakes.
  6. They've already added Gurriel, Morales, and Pearce. It's not like nothing productive has happened.
  7. I like Moss too. Sit him against tough lefties (maybe an Upton platoon) and he'll produce close to 2 wins, and likely comes on a 1 year deal. I also really like the idea of Valbuena. He's quietly put up a 115 wRC+ over 1400 PA the last three years. He's been an average defender at 3B, which means he'd probably be a good defender at 1st, can handle 2B if you need him to, and I'd probably give him time on the OF in spring to see how he looks. That's a flexible piece, and the expectations seems to be a contract in the 2/20 range for a guy you'd expect about 4 WAR from over the two years.
  8. Rasmus, Moss, Pagan, Saunders, Bautista, Valbuena, Napoli, are all interesting to some degree, with Napoli and Valbuena pushing Pearce to the OF on a near full-time basis.
  9. I wonder where he got the data then. Paging North/Cyborg/njh maybe
  10. I wasn't concerned specifically with the implication on Tulo. I've just been under the impression that the statcast info he has access to is missing information on a certain type of contact, which makes an 'adjusted wRC+' pretty irresponsible, especially with no disclaimer. But maybe I'm wrong and he's not missing data.
  11. Doesn't the statcast data he's using for this just not capture a bunch of events, including all very weak contact?
  12. Welcome to the forum. I suggest the "Orioles Hangout Suxxxxxxxxx" thread to start off with.
  13. I still think he'll be considered if the team has to go 2-3 extra starters deep at the same time.
  14. I'm in on Fowler at 5/80.
  15. Only if you're not Buck Showalter.
  16. Projected WAR is probably like 2-2.5. I was adding another win or 2 to account for the elite performance in high leverage spots. It would be interesting to see how various teams go about assigning value to guys like that. I basically just do a vague mental adjustment upwards from a WAR projection.
  17. I think it's fine. The actual impact of Chapman in 2017 is probably 3-4 wins, + an uptick in value in the playoffs. You would expect him to be worth like 48-64M in the first two years of the deal alone if his skills remain static in the short term.
  18. Bolsinger Oberholtzer Biagini Probably in that order.
  19. Hard false
  20. Jays 2017 rotation: Sanchez Stroman Happ Estrada Liriano Order TBD. /thread
  21. So BBBB asks a question, gets an honest answer, and then picks a fight. For all the complaining he does about people mistreating him, the guy might be the biggest ******* on the forum.
  22. Unless something happened in the last 5 minutes, no I didn't.
  23. He's good, but it's hard to see a path to the opening day roster for him barring injuries, because he has options.
×
×
  • Create New...