Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

BTS

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    42,924
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by BTS

  1. I like Moss too. Sit him against tough lefties (maybe an Upton platoon) and he'll produce close to 2 wins, and likely comes on a 1 year deal. I also really like the idea of Valbuena. He's quietly put up a 115 wRC+ over 1400 PA the last three years. He's been an average defender at 3B, which means he'd probably be a good defender at 1st, can handle 2B if you need him to, and I'd probably give him time on the OF in spring to see how he looks. That's a flexible piece, and the expectations seems to be a contract in the 2/20 range for a guy you'd expect about 4 WAR from over the two years.
  2. Rasmus, Moss, Pagan, Saunders, Bautista, Valbuena, Napoli, are all interesting to some degree, with Napoli and Valbuena pushing Pearce to the OF on a near full-time basis.
  3. I wonder where he got the data then. Paging North/Cyborg/njh maybe
  4. I wasn't concerned specifically with the implication on Tulo. I've just been under the impression that the statcast info he has access to is missing information on a certain type of contact, which makes an 'adjusted wRC+' pretty irresponsible, especially with no disclaimer. But maybe I'm wrong and he's not missing data.
  5. Doesn't the statcast data he's using for this just not capture a bunch of events, including all very weak contact?
  6. Welcome to the forum. I suggest the "Orioles Hangout Suxxxxxxxxx" thread to start off with.
  7. I still think he'll be considered if the team has to go 2-3 extra starters deep at the same time.
  8. I'm in on Fowler at 5/80.
  9. Only if you're not Buck Showalter.
  10. Projected WAR is probably like 2-2.5. I was adding another win or 2 to account for the elite performance in high leverage spots. It would be interesting to see how various teams go about assigning value to guys like that. I basically just do a vague mental adjustment upwards from a WAR projection.
  11. I think it's fine. The actual impact of Chapman in 2017 is probably 3-4 wins, + an uptick in value in the playoffs. You would expect him to be worth like 48-64M in the first two years of the deal alone if his skills remain static in the short term.
  12. Bolsinger Oberholtzer Biagini Probably in that order.
  13. Hard false
  14. Jays 2017 rotation: Sanchez Stroman Happ Estrada Liriano Order TBD. /thread
  15. So BBBB asks a question, gets an honest answer, and then picks a fight. For all the complaining he does about people mistreating him, the guy might be the biggest ******* on the forum.
  16. Unless something happened in the last 5 minutes, no I didn't.
  17. He's good, but it's hard to see a path to the opening day roster for him barring injuries, because he has options.
  18. It's hard to see Oberholtzer making the team. Him and Bolsinger are too similar (guys whose value is in their ability to quickly transition to the rotation, but don't have the stuff to profile as very good relievers), but Bolsinger seems to just be a better pitcher. Oberholtzer probably gets through waivers too.
  19. So right now we have: Osuna Grilli Biagini Loup (only lefty, so close to lock, but does have options) out of options Bolsinger Oberholtzer Schultz remaining options Campos Leone Barnes Dermody Girodo Of the out of options guys, Bo Schultz is probably finished here. Bolsinger is probably close to a lock to make the team, as he's a very useful swingman and probably wouldn't make it through waivers. So there will probably be some competition between Sparkman and Oberholtzer for one spot, with Sparkman having more upside, and thus the inside track. So something like: Osuna Grilli Biagini free agent signing Loup Bolsinger Sparkman/Oberholtzer/one of the guys with options only if they other two suck in spring
  20. Yup
  21. Yankees finished 84-78. They probably finish like 75-87 without Betances-Chapman-Miller. You weren't necessarily doing this, but I hate when people use them missing the playoffs as an argument against the effectiveness of a stacked bullpen.
  22. Do you even read this forum?
×
×
  • Create New...