connorp Old-Timey Member Posted June 10, 2024 Posted June 10, 2024 Not sure what point Connor is trying to make by spamming out random 5-10 year old contracts that pop into his head. They are all sub-200 million anyway and tend to prove the point that this version of Vlad isn't getting a 10 year, 250 million megadeal. Maybe I can still get a Big Mac for $2 too. Or sign the next Mickey Mantle for $500
connorp Old-Timey Member Posted June 10, 2024 Posted June 10, 2024 The times have changed, teams understand that defense is a thing now. And most guys can be moved to 1B in their later years, Harper for example. For a 1B to get a big contract these days, he needs to have an elite bat. Talking 130ish wRC+ and up with a consistent track record. Agreed on the 130+ that’s what teams will value Vladdy at. As for times changing, they haven’t really. Teams pay for offense. It is what it is. Sorry guys. BTS says I make s*** up and then everyone argues the point lol
connorp Old-Timey Member Posted June 10, 2024 Posted June 10, 2024 Maybe the Jays can find another 2 or 3 Three WAR IKF’s and make a run at this title
Terminator Old-Timey Member Posted June 10, 2024 Posted June 10, 2024 Maybe the Jays can find another 2 or 3 Three WAR IKF’s and make a run at this title That would be pretty cool to have a team full of clutch, slap hitting defensive wizards at every position. Kind of like the 2015 Royals I guess.
Stangstag Old-Timey Member Posted June 10, 2024 Posted June 10, 2024 Agreed on the 130+ that’s what teams will value Vladdy at. As for times changing, they haven’t really. Teams pay for offense. It is what it is. Sorry guys. BTS says I make s*** up and then everyone argues the point lol It depends how Vladdy looks the rest of this year + next. If he has another season like 2023 teams will be hesitant to give him a big deal.
Stangstag Old-Timey Member Posted June 10, 2024 Posted June 10, 2024 That would be pretty cool to have a team full of clutch, slap hitting defensive wizards at every position. Kind of like the 2015 Royals I guess. Drinking Yankee fans’ tears as we slap hit our way to the WS would be awesome
connorp Old-Timey Member Posted June 11, 2024 Posted June 11, 2024 It depends how Vladdy looks the rest of this year + next. If he has another season like 2023 teams will be hesitant to give him a big deal. I’m with that too but I’m sipping the Vlad kool aid a bit again. Not like 160 OPs+ Vlad but 130 all day. 140 probably
Stangstag Old-Timey Member Posted June 11, 2024 Posted June 11, 2024 I’m with that too but I’m sipping the Vlad kool aid a bit again. Not like 160 OPs+ Vlad but 130 all day. 140 probably I suppose you own him on one of your fantasy teams?
Laika Community Moderator Posted June 11, 2024 Posted June 11, 2024 I might agree with connorp Vlad camp is probably eyeing the Devers extension What he would actually get in free agency just depends so much on the next 1.6 years though
connorp Old-Timey Member Posted June 11, 2024 Posted June 11, 2024 I suppose you own him on one of your fantasy teams? I have the one and I do. But I spammed many a Vlad offers over the years at all high and low points.
connorp Old-Timey Member Posted June 11, 2024 Posted June 11, 2024 I might agree with connorp Vlad camp is probably eyeing the Devers extension What he would actually get in free agency just depends so much on the next 1.6 years though Well, of course agreed on some level, but you also have to take into account “bad Vlad” was good for 25-30 hr and .350obp and as a contact guy, just seems like there’s not a ton of risk in the profile. Like a Prince Fielder, who I guess isn’t a good comp for low “risk” but seems it was more a freak genetic thing than being fat. If I remember right
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted June 11, 2024 Posted June 11, 2024 Well, of course agreed on some level, but you also have to take into account “bad Vlad” was good for 25-30 hr and .350obp and as a contact guy, just seems like there’s not a ton of risk in the profile. Like a Prince Fielder, who I guess isn’t a good comp for low “risk” but seems it was more a freak genetic thing than being fat. If I remember right You just saw me post it earlier, lol. Right now Vlad gets 10-200. You guys are high, man.
Carlos Danger Old-Timey Member Posted June 11, 2024 Posted June 11, 2024 Well, you can't foresee a degenerative spine disorder. Yes you can: Doctors have long felt that being overweight can lead to degenerative disc (DDD) disease of the spine, often causing lower back pain. Statistics show that as a patient’s BMI (Body Mass Index) climbs, so does the incident of their lower back pain. Patients with a BMI greater than 25 are more likely to develop osteoarthritis than those with a lower BMI. This is the deduction from observing the biomechanical action of body weight on the discs of the spine, where bearing years of extra pressure will often take its toll on the bones and cartilage of joints.
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted June 11, 2024 Posted June 11, 2024 Yes you can: Doctors have long felt that being overweight can lead to degenerative disc (DDD) disease of the spine, often causing lower back pain. Statistics show that as a patient’s BMI (Body Mass Index) climbs, so does the incident of their lower back pain. Patients with a BMI greater than 25 are more likely to develop osteoarthritis than those with a lower BMI. This is the deduction from observing the biomechanical action of body weight on the discs of the spine, where bearing years of extra pressure will often take its toll on the bones and cartilage of joints. Wrong, spinal stenosis is a restriction in the neck canal, has nothing to do with weight within reason, David Wright was huge too, right?
Carlos Danger Old-Timey Member Posted June 11, 2024 Posted June 11, 2024 Wrong, spinal stenosis is a restriction in the neck canal, has nothing to do with weight within reason, David Wright was huge too, right? Yes, obesity is a risk factor for spinal stenosis, a condition that occurs when the spinal canal narrows, potentially pinching nerves. Obesity can contribute to spinal stenosis through biomechanical changes that damage the spine, such as: Degenerative disc disease Being overweight or obese can speed up the process of disc wear and tear, which can reduce their ability to cushion the spine. Increased compression forces Adiposity in the trunk of the body can increase compression forces on disc surfaces.
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted June 11, 2024 Posted June 11, 2024 Yes, obesity is a risk factor for spinal stenosis, a condition that occurs when the spinal canal narrows, potentially pinching nerves. Obesity can contribute to spinal stenosis through biomechanical changes that damage the spine, such as: Degenerative disc disease Being overweight or obese can speed up the process of disc wear and tear, which can reduce their ability to cushion the spine. Increased compression forces Adiposity in the trunk of the body can increase compression forces on disc surfaces. That's in lumbar cases, cervical is simply a degeneration and the symptoms are far more harsh than lumbar stenosis. I don't disagree there. Spinal stenosis in the neck can cause: Numbness Tingling or weakness in a hand, leg, foot or arm Problems with walking and balance Neck pain Problems with the bowel or bladder I have 4 of those symptoms and have went through 2 surgeries, the very same procedures huys like Fielder and Wright went through, hell my soaking wet 110 lb ex-wife had the procedure. It's flippin' brutal.
Stangstag Old-Timey Member Posted June 11, 2024 Posted June 11, 2024 That's in lumbar cases, cervical is simply a degeneration and the symptoms are far more harsh than lumbar stenosis. I don't disagree there. Spinal stenosis in the neck can cause: Numbness Tingling or weakness in a hand, leg, foot or arm Problems with walking and balance Neck pain Problems with the bowel or bladder I have 4 of those symptoms and have went through 2 surgeries, the very same procedures huys like Fielder and Wright went through, hell my soaking wet 110 lb ex-wife had the procedure. It's flippin' brutal. I always knew you were full of s***. Jk Sorry maybe that was in bad taste but I had to
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted June 11, 2024 Posted June 11, 2024 I always knew you were full of s***. Jk Sorry maybe that was in bad taste but I had to lol... that's the one I don't have.
Olerud363 Old-Timey Member Posted June 11, 2024 Posted June 11, 2024 I might agree with connorp Vlad camp is probably eyeing the Devers extension What he would actually get in free agency just depends so much on the next 1.6 years though In the good scenario where he performs as a 3 WAR guy over next 1.6 years his lifetime fWAR pattern will be pretty similar to Cody Bellingers. However Bellinger's line is much more bizarre and erratic, even going .165 with negative WAR. But the average and pattern of WAR from 2021 to 2026 will probably be similar to Bellinger 2018-2023, big MVP year followed by becoming a 1 WAR guy for a bit then (potential for Vlad) rebound before free agency.
Jimcanuck Old-Timey Member Posted June 11, 2024 Posted June 11, 2024 Bellinger trough is pretty conclusively injury related. Vlad doesn't have that excuse.
Laika Community Moderator Posted June 11, 2024 Posted June 11, 2024 Bellinger trough is pretty conclusively injury related. Vlad doesn't have that excuse. that's doesn't really help team's will look at Vlad and drool. "we can fix her" they don't really think that about Bellinger anymore. you can't turn hamburger meat back into steak.
Laika Community Moderator Posted June 11, 2024 Posted June 11, 2024 In the good scenario where he performs as a 3 WAR guy over next 1.6 years his lifetime fWAR pattern will be pretty similar to Cody Bellingers. However Bellinger's line is much more bizarre and erratic, even going .165 with negative WAR. But the average and pattern of WAR from 2021 to 2026 will probably be similar to Bellinger 2018-2023, big MVP year followed by becoming a 1 WAR guy for a bit then (potential for Vlad) rebound before free agency. If Vlad can have a 4 WAR year in 2025 then the Devers comps are strong Both have the seam peak (6.4 and 6.3 WAR) Both have the same valley (Devers bad in his first 750 MLB PA, 1.5 WAR, and after his great year, 0.8 WAR in 250 PA) Vlad loses a bit in defensive value and BsR but I don't know how much that matters for a contract. It's not like teams look at Devers and think he's a long term 3B. Of course if needs a 4+ WAR year at age 26 to make that a strong comp. Or at least very strong final offensive lines in 2024 and 2025. If he has a stinker then he just looks objectively worse than Devers on a WAR graph since Devers has been steadily good since age 24.
Jimcanuck Old-Timey Member Posted June 11, 2024 Posted June 11, 2024 that's doesn't really help team's will look at Vlad and drool. "we can fix her" they don't really think that about Bellinger anymore. you can't turn hamburger meat back into steak. Dude Belly was 10th in NL MVP voting last year. That's steak.
Laika Community Moderator Posted June 11, 2024 Posted June 11, 2024 Well, of course agreed on some level, but you also have to take into account “bad Vlad” was good for 25-30 hr and .350obp and as a contact guy, just seems like there’s not a ton of risk in the profile. Like a Prince Fielder, who I guess isn’t a good comp for low “risk” but seems it was more a freak genetic thing than being fat. If I remember right The age at free agency is the biggest factor. You take his exact WAR trend and make him a free agent at 29 or 30 and teams are not nearly as interested, it would shave years and dollars off that contract and not just a linear reduction like him getting two less years on the end it. But you make him a free agent after his age 26 season and GMs start to get excited about the proposition of buying like 4 years of peak Vlad in free agency and then fixing him and it being some franchise altering move.
Laika Community Moderator Posted June 11, 2024 Posted June 11, 2024 Dude Belly was 10th in NL MVP voting last year. That's steak.
Olerud363 Old-Timey Member Posted June 11, 2024 Posted June 11, 2024 The age at free agency is the biggest factor. You take his exact WAR trend and make him a free agent at 29 or 30 and teams are not nearly as interested, it would shave years and dollars off that contract and not just a linear reduction like him getting two less years on the end it. But you make him a free agent after his age 26 season and GMs start to get excited about the proposition of buying like 4 years of peak Vlad in free agency and then fixing him and it being some franchise altering move. Mark my words. He signs with the Red Sox and stays with them until 41. Wins a triple crown, and MVP, fulfills his Pujols potential and like David Ortiz somehow defies belief and lasts until he is 41. Becomes part of the fabric of the city, brings joy to the youth, makes old, bitter, message board posters less skeptical. Changes the vibe of the city. On buses and billboards with Jason Taytum. He will be everything we dreamed he would be but for the Red Sox.
connorp Old-Timey Member Posted June 11, 2024 Posted June 11, 2024 Bellinger trough is pretty conclusively injury related. Vlad doesn't have that excuse. Dumb comp. Vladdy never hit the gutter. That’s the point. 118 is bad Vlad.
connorp Old-Timey Member Posted June 11, 2024 Posted June 11, 2024 The age at free agency is the biggest factor. You take his exact WAR trend and make him a free agent at 29 or 30 and teams are not nearly as interested, it would shave years and dollars off that contract and not just a linear reduction like him getting two less years on the end it. But you make him a free agent after his age 26 season and GMs start to get excited about the proposition of buying like 4 years of peak Vlad in free agency and then fixing him and it being some franchise altering move. Yeah, obviously. Otherwise is a 5/130 Goldy deal. Springer like deal at 31 or whatever he was. 1b isn’t hurting him. All depends what the bat is
connorp Old-Timey Member Posted June 11, 2024 Posted June 11, 2024 Mark my words. He signs with the Red Sox and stays with them until 41. Wins a triple crown, and MVP, fulfills his Pujols potential and like David Ortiz somehow defies belief and lasts until he is 41. Becomes part of the fabric of the city, brings joy to the youth, makes old, bitter, message board posters less skeptical. Changes the vibe of the city. On buses and billboards with Jason Taytum. He will be everything we dreamed he would be but for the Red Sox. Idk. I had Casas in one fantasy league even though I was not high on him. When he plays, he looks legit top tier 1b in future
max silver Old-Timey Member Posted June 11, 2024 Posted June 11, 2024 Looks pretty scrumptious. I used to eat s*** like this when I was a bachelor and didn't really know how to cook.
Blaine Bullard Dunedin Blue Jays - A OF In Thursday's doubleheader, the 19-year-old went 5-for-8. He was 3-for-5 with two doubles in the first game and 2-for-3 in the second game. Explore Blaine Bullard News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now