Stangstag Old-Timey Member Posted January 15, 2024 Posted January 15, 2024 I think the Jays are in a tough spot - there is no one you really want to sign out there who will become an albatross the second they sign the player. $200m to Snell or Bellinger? Really? Montgomery is solid but you're probably looking at $150/5 minimum and he doesn't excite me. No one else really moves the needle - Chapman is a defence first player - on a good team he'd bat 8th and that would be ok. I think the Jays just tread water for 2024 - they still need to see what Vladdy is - is he a 2 WAR player or an MVP-type player? If the Jays flounder - they have an excise and probably a need to blow it up and start again. On a “good” team he’d bat 8th?? Come on dude…
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted January 15, 2024 Posted January 15, 2024 To be honest, the Jays have been rumored to be doing that with practically every free agent that doesn't get what they want right away. It's a good approach because you never know when you get a bargain but there's only so many reports you can take seriously lol. Contenders kick tires on everyone, it's that simple, and bargains are always the goal.
Jays24 Old-Timey Member Posted January 15, 2024 Posted January 15, 2024 On a “good” team he’d bat 8th?? Come on dude… The correct answer would be 6th lol
connorp Old-Timey Member Posted January 15, 2024 Posted January 15, 2024 Contenders kick tires on everyone, it's that simple, and bargains are always the goal. It’s not that simple, douche. How come the Jays are Top 3 on nearly every player when there’s probably 15-20 other teams that have kicked the tires on the player? There’s some reasoning that’s not completely apparent.
connorp Old-Timey Member Posted January 15, 2024 Posted January 15, 2024 The team could have a leaker, intentional or not. Or agents have grown comfortable using the Jays as a foil, and they’re also comfortable knowing the Jays don’t have an issue being attached to players. Other teams may like to operate more secretive
Laika Community Moderator Posted January 15, 2024 Posted January 15, 2024 Or Atkins is just a little pest who calls agents / other teams more often than most
connorp Old-Timey Member Posted January 15, 2024 Posted January 15, 2024 The correct answer would be 6th lol Wouldn’t be egregious to say 7th. I mean is he a definite 5 hitter? 6th is the safer place and 6-7 is pretty interchangeable. Depends on matchup and recent bias.
connorp Old-Timey Member Posted January 15, 2024 Posted January 15, 2024 Or Atkins is just a little pest who calls agents / other teams more often than most Hmm.. yeah maybe sort of like that. I’m thinking like the guy that hangs in too long with the girl who is clearly into someone else. Atkins would be like guy B leaving a message being like: “hey, just checking in. If you ever still want to hang out, give me a call”. Meanwhile most other with a basic T level have focused their interest on others
Laika Community Moderator Posted January 15, 2024 Posted January 15, 2024 Hmm.. yeah maybe sort of like that. I’m thinking like the guy that hangs in too long with the girl who is clearly into someone else. Atkins would be like guy B leaving a message being like: “hey, just checking in. If you ever still want to hang out, give me a call”. Meanwhile most other with a basic T level have focused their interest on others Pretty much. Or, like that guy in sales who won't take a hint and insists on scheduling a follow up call in one month to see if you have changed your mind
Rusty_Savage Verified Member Posted January 15, 2024 Posted January 15, 2024 Hmm.. yeah maybe sort of like that. I’m thinking like the guy that hangs in too long with the girl who is clearly into someone else. Atkins would be like guy B leaving a message being like: “hey, just checking in. If you ever still want to hang out, give me a call”. Meanwhile most other with a basic T level have focused their interest on othersI don't think it's that cut and dry, he managed to sign Springer who was one of the best FA available that off-season. He also ponied up for Gausman who was, again, one of the top FA of that off season. He probably kicks the tires on a lot of free agents which is better than not. Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
connorp Old-Timey Member Posted January 15, 2024 Posted January 15, 2024 Pretty much. Or, like that guy in sales who won't take a hint and insists on scheduling a follow up call in one month to see if you have changed your mind Ah. Yeah that’s a pretty good comp as well.
Laika Community Moderator Posted January 15, 2024 Posted January 15, 2024 I don't think it's that cut and dry, he managed to sign Springer who was one of the best FA available that off-season. He also ponied up for Gausman who was, again, one of the top FA of that off season. He probably kicks the tires on a lot of free agents which is better than not. Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk Yeah you have to give him credit. Even the people who dislike Atkins for whatever reason, valid or not, cannot deny that he has gotten some big stuff done on a consistent basis.
connorp Old-Timey Member Posted January 15, 2024 Posted January 15, 2024 I don't think it's that cut and dry, he managed to sign Springer who was one of the best FA available that off-season. He also ponied up for Gausman who was, again, one of the top FA of that off season. He probably kicks the tires on a lot of free agents which is better than not. Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk That’s not really the point here. I didn’t suggest they’ll never sign one of the better FA. That’s a different argument. Many team can point to this guy or that guy that they signed. Those teams don’t get their names attached to FA/trade targets at any rate like the Jays.
Rusty_Savage Verified Member Posted January 15, 2024 Posted January 15, 2024 That’s not really the point here. I didn’t suggest they’ll never sign one of the better FA. That’s a different argument. Many team can point to this guy or that guy that they signed. Those teams don’t get their names attached to FA/trade targets at any rate like the Jays. Fair enough, I think the reason why they do get attached to essentially every FA is because Atkins is very active and checks in on essentially every FA, and they are a top spending team. Sure some of it is probably just leveraging being done by the agent but I'm fine with that. Also the Jays are one of the most followed teams in baseball and people like Morosi use them for click bait. Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
L54 Old-Timey Member Posted January 15, 2024 Posted January 15, 2024 It doesn’t bother me that they are attached to a lot of players. Imagine being a Pirates fan - “Pittsburgh linked to Carlos Santana” He’s made some really good FA moves and trades. Ohtani choosing the Dodgers or NYY overpaying for Soto doesn’t really change that I don’t want Bellinger. So far it looks like he’s avoided that land mine contract. I would prefer doing nothing than hamstringing the payroll for five years personally
Jimcanuck Old-Timey Member Posted January 15, 2024 Posted January 15, 2024 Mets sign Dominican outfielder Vladi Miguel Guerrero Another Vlad Sr. offspring
The Cats Ass Old-Timey Member Posted January 15, 2024 Posted January 15, 2024 It doesn’t bother me that they are attached to a lot of players. Imagine being a Pirates fan - “Pittsburgh linked to Carlos Santana” He’s made some really good FA moves and trades. Ohtani choosing the Dodgers or NYY overpaying for Soto doesn’t really change that I don’t want Bellinger. So far it looks like he’s avoided that land mine contract. I would prefer doing nothing than hamstringing the payroll for five years personally Atkins is messaging Bellinger every day checking to see if he's ready for a 1 year deal. I'm starting to wonder if any team is willing to bite the bullet and go 5 years. He might almost be better to go 1 + player option and test the market again next year at age 29. Teams are probably still extremely hesitant for a long term deal because of his 3 s***** years in a row.
Jimcanuck Old-Timey Member Posted January 15, 2024 Posted January 15, 2024 Well, it's Boras so if there's a sizable gap, Bellinger is in for a long wait Teams message Boras, not Belly
max silver Old-Timey Member Posted January 15, 2024 Posted January 15, 2024 Atkins is messaging Bellinger every day checking to see if he's ready for a 1 year deal. I'm starting to wonder if any team is willing to bite the bullet and go 5 years. He might almost be better to go 1 + player option and test the market again next year at age 29. Teams are probably still extremely hesitant for a long term deal because of his 3 s***** years in a row. I can't say I particularly agree with the whole notion of Bellinger having 3 s***** years in a row. His 2020 covid shortened season numbers are pretty decent when prorated to a full season of play. He produced 1.4 FWAR in only 56 games which corresponds to 4.2 FWAR in a full season which is reduced from his peak but still very solid. The expected stats were pretty stout as well with a .374 xwOBA vs actual of .337 so over a full season of play this most likely would have balanced out a bit.
The Cats Ass Old-Timey Member Posted January 15, 2024 Posted January 15, 2024 Well, it's Boras so if there's a sizable gap, Bellinger is in for a long wait Teams message Boras, not Belly Not Atkins. He's sliding directly into Bellinger's DM's
The Cats Ass Old-Timey Member Posted January 15, 2024 Posted January 15, 2024 I can't say I particularly agree with the whole notion of Bellinger having 3 s***** years in a row. His 2020 covid shortened season numbers are pretty decent when prorated to a full season of play. He produced 1.4 FWAR in only 56 games which corresponds to 4.2 FWAR in a full season which is reduced from his peak but still very solid. The expected stats were pretty stout as well with a .374 xwOBA vs actual of .337 so over a full season of play this most likely would have balanced out a bit. Ya, I guess it's just 2 years then. Was just going off the quick look I took and seen he had a sub .800 OPS.
Jimcanuck Old-Timey Member Posted January 15, 2024 Posted January 15, 2024 Ya, I guess it's just 2 years then. Was just going off the quick look I took and seen he had a sub .800 OPS. He was carrying a very low BABIP through those 2 years. He wasn't right, health wise. If he's back to full health, good chance he improves on 2023.
Laika Community Moderator Posted January 15, 2024 Posted January 15, 2024 Can a guy really ever be "back to full health", in the context of professional sports, when he was so hurt for two whole years? Like, some damage just cannot be 100% undone. Also, some of the statcast stuff from 2023 like EV data doesn't show a guy who is 100% back. More like, 90% back or so.
Jimcanuck Old-Timey Member Posted January 15, 2024 Posted January 15, 2024 Can a guy really ever be "back to full health", in the context of professional sports, when he was so hurt for two whole years? Like, some damage just cannot be 100% undone. Also, some of the statcast stuff from 2023 like EV data doesn't show a guy who is 100% back. More like, 90% back or so. In the case of Bellinger all signs indicate permanent damage, so a big IF in "If he's back to full health..." My first 2024 prediction - a 2 WAR floor for Bellinger over the next 5 years, with around 5 WAR in the best year of the 5.
BTS Community Moderator Posted January 16, 2024 Posted January 16, 2024 https://blogs.fangraphs.com/2024-zips-projections-colorado-rockies/ The Rockies projections are hilarious. Toronto isn't even a super-team, and how many players on Colorado would make the 26-man here? Jones, Tovar, and McMahon offensively and maybe just Justin Lawrence in middle relief for pitchers?
John_Havok Old-Timey Member Posted January 16, 2024 Author Posted January 16, 2024 Mets sign Dominican outfielder Vladi Miguel Guerrero Another Vlad Sr. offspring Dude has 8 or 9 kids …5 different mothers. Vlad the Impaler indeed.
Stangstag Old-Timey Member Posted January 16, 2024 Posted January 16, 2024 Dude has 8 or 9 kids …5 different mothers. Vlad the Impaler indeed. Im pretty sure he’s in the double digits for children at this point
wilko Old-Timey Member Posted January 16, 2024 Posted January 16, 2024 Im pretty sure he’s in the double digits for children at this point He's creating generational wealth!
max silver Old-Timey Member Posted January 16, 2024 Posted January 16, 2024 He's creating generational wealth! Yeah this could be the ultimate baseball dynasty family of all time with how many of his progeny are signing with major league clubs. Although up to this point he's probably been creating generational child support payments.
L54 Old-Timey Member Posted January 16, 2024 Posted January 16, 2024 I wonder if these kids have relationships with each other? Or if they just know that they all exist
Johnny King Vancouver Canadians - A+ LHP The 19-year-old top prospect has made 16 High-A starts. He is 3-2 with a 2.92 ERA. In 61 2/3 innings, he's walked 35, but he's struck out 83 batters. Explore Johnny King News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now