Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
He's a bandaid reliever whose time here is likely limited and who is unlikely to have any influence on the clubhouse. This is a none issue.

 

said the horse whisperer LOL

Posted

So in order to put him on the roster you have to make room on the 40 man and 26 man, losing a pitcher. Who is moved

 

Shatkins is bad with bullpen management

Posted
Surprised they would do this instead of just bringing up Eisert or Hernandez, or even Spraker has looked better lately.

 

I guess they want a veteran guy, and maybe they don't want to throw any of the rookies straight into the fire vs the AL east teams...

 

Yep. It honestly doesn't make sense. This move will most certainly cost a bunch of runs. It could make the difference in a few wins or losses.

Posted

Brace yourself for Tabby commentary. He is gonna bust a nut over this.

 

"Romo is a veteran. He is a guy who has done it...who has been there before...he has been a winner...and he knows how to pitch".

Posted
So in order to put him on the roster you have to make room on the 40 man and 26 man, losing a pitcher. Who is moved

 

Shatkins is bad with bullpen management

 

DFA Capra makes space on the 40 man. Gage, Thornton or Castillo goes down. Nothing to lose sleep over really.

Posted
DFA Capra makes space on the 40 man. Gage, Thornton or Castillo goes down. Nothing to lose sleep over really.

 

You just named 3 guys not scuffling.

Posted
If the Jays give him a short leash, no problem with this signing at all. He posted a 1.0 WAR in 2019.

 

He's been s*** since, lol. Maybe if he stops giving up bombs, he still has that frisbee slider though.

Old-Timey Member
Posted

I’ve always had faith in Atkins….until now:(

 

This has to be stop gap to get us through the next three weeks.

Posted
I think it says a lot about management when we're this worried about how a scrap heap acquisition will be used.
Posted
I think it says a lot about management when we're this worried about how a scrap heap acquisition will be used.

 

Lol yeah that’s a fair observation

Posted
You just named 3 guys not scuffling.

 

never said it was ideal, just that it's not really a huge puzzle to solve that will catastrophically alter the Jays season.

Posted
Brace yourself for Tabby commentary. He is gonna bust a nut over this.

 

"Romo is a veteran. He is a guy who has done it...who has been there before...he has been a winner...and he knows how to pitch".

 

Haha... nailed it.

Posted

It's just sad that the Jays have to sign a washed up s*** bag like this just to fill innings.

 

You'd think after 7 years there would be more in the tank when a few pitchers go down to injury.

Posted
It's just sad that the Jays have to sign a washed up s*** bag like this just to fill innings.

 

You'd think after 7 years there would be more in the tank when a few pitchers go down to injury.

 

There is though, you mentioned them earlier.

Posted
I really hate this move. It's like the front office looked at his 86mph fastball and upper 4's xFIP the last 4 years and said "Man, I gotta get me some of that!". At least sign someone who could be tweaked to find something.
Posted
I wonder if they have a very specific plan for Romo. Like very specific. Like use him exclusively as an opener against a righty dominated lineup only for Kikuchi starts.
Posted
I wonder if they have a very specific plan for Romo. Like very specific. Like use him exclusively as an opener against a righty dominated lineup only for Kikuchi starts.

 

Yeah then maybe they can give up 6 runs combined in the first inning instead of just 4

Posted
I don't think this is anything other than a guy that will come in when the game is lopsided in favour of either team, to eat some outs and save better arms for higher leverage.
Community Moderator
Posted
I don't think this is anything other than a guy that will come in when the game is lopsided in favour of either team, to eat some outs and save better arms for higher leverage.

 

Yeah but why even sign him for that?

 

There are minor leaguers on the 40 who could fill that role.

 

They must thing he could be a bit more than that...

Posted
I don't think this is anything other than a guy that will come in when the game is lopsided in favour of either team, to eat some outs and save better arms for higher leverage.

 

Our manager will have him in high leverage spots in no time

Posted
Yeah but why even sign him for that?

 

There are minor leaguers on the 40 who could fill that role.

 

They must thing he could be a bit more than that...

 

I agree 100% with this, Im not sure but as I mentioned in another thread I think Zulu could be lost in Rule 5 this year and if thats the case it makes this signing so much worse than it already is.

Posted
I agree 100% with this, Im not sure but as I mentioned in another thread I think Zulu could be lost in Rule 5 this year and if thats the case it makes this signing so much worse than it already is.

 

They'll just add him to the 40 later this season or after the WS to avoid the Rule 5, zero reason they won't.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...