Laika Community Moderator Posted December 30, 2018 Posted December 30, 2018 This is such a disgusting and boring but no-brainer / good-on-paper trade, lmao. The ultimate Atkins 2019 move. Makes all the sense in the world and pisses off the masses.
glory Old-Timey Member Posted December 30, 2018 Posted December 30, 2018 Now let's trade Stroman to them for Baez and Allen. I'd be fine with that type of deal, but holy s*** this team is going to suck even more than everyone expects them to if they trade Stroman and replace him with Richard. Richard was about a 0.5 WAR reliever per season in 2015-16. I think using him out of the pen and hoping for a good half season might net more in a mid season trade than anything he could do as a starter. If anything, starting him might destroy his value, especially in this division.
King Old-Timey Member Posted December 30, 2018 Posted December 30, 2018 Atkins not protecting Romano then trading away Panas? Confirmed racist against canadians
jays4life19 Old-Timey Member Posted December 30, 2018 Author Posted December 30, 2018 4:54pm: Toronto will pay half of Richard’s $3MM salary, AJ Cassavell of MLB.com suggests.
King Old-Timey Member Posted December 30, 2018 Posted December 30, 2018 I'd be fine with that type of deal, but holy s*** this team is going to suck even more than everyone expects them to if they trade Stroman and replace him with Richard. Richard was about a 0.5 WAR reliever per season in 2015-16. I think using him out of the pen and hoping for a good half season might net more in a mid season trade than anything he could do as a starter. If anything, starting him might destroy his value, especially in this division. Might be an effective LOOGY. Has good numbers vs LHB
Orgfiller Old-Timey Member Posted December 30, 2018 Posted December 30, 2018 I'd be fine with that type of deal, but holy s*** this team is going to suck even more than everyone expects them to if they trade Stroman and replace him with Richard. Richard was about a 0.5 WAR reliever per season in 2015-16. I think using him out of the pen and hoping for a good half season might net more in a mid season trade than anything he could do as a starter. If anything, starting him might destroy his value, especially in this division. You mention the 0.5 reliever seasons in 15-16 but not the 2.4 WAR year he had immediately after as a starter? Richard is anything but sexy but he's pitching depth, of the slightly below average to average variety.
Captain Adama Old-Timey Member Posted December 30, 2018 Posted December 30, 2018 You mention the 0.5 reliever seasons in 15-16 but not the 2.4 WAR year he had immediately after as a starter? Richard is anything but sexy but he's pitching depth, of the slightly below average to average variety. I might hate watching Richard pitch more than I did with R.A. Dickey.
Daniel Labude Jays Centre Contributor Posted December 30, 2018 Posted December 30, 2018 I might hate watching Richard pitch more than I did with R.A. Dickey. This isn't possible lmao With Dickey you were reminded each pitch that Syndergaard was given up for the pile of garbage
BTS Community Moderator Posted December 30, 2018 Posted December 30, 2018 I might hate watching Richard pitch more than I did with R.A. Dickey. I actually quite enjoying watching him when he's on.
Abomination Old-Timey Member Posted December 30, 2018 Posted December 30, 2018 I love watching knuckleball pitchers. I don't always love watching it after contact is made though.
Orgfiller Old-Timey Member Posted December 31, 2018 Posted December 31, 2018 I might hate watching Richard pitch more than I did with R.A. Dickey. He has such a funky delivery that I can kind of get this even when he's doing well.
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted December 31, 2018 Posted December 31, 2018 So what's the starting rotation if this is it for acquisitions?
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted December 31, 2018 Posted December 31, 2018 Edwin Jackson next, please Jays getting Jackson has seemed likely for about 8 years now
Laika Community Moderator Posted December 31, 2018 Posted December 31, 2018 Rolled my thoughts on Shoemaker and Richard into one blog, share it with your mom --> https://www.radioscouts.com/blog/blue-jays-add-underrated-pitching-depth-in-shoemaker-richard
Dr. Dinger Old-Timey Member Posted December 31, 2018 Posted December 31, 2018 Fantastic little pick-up to torch some innings and aid the hard tank next season.
DaKiNdLa Verified Member Posted December 31, 2018 Posted December 31, 2018 Jays getting Jackson has seemed likely for about 8 years now Didn't we technically have Jackson like 8 years ago? Thought he was a pretty decent starter then, remember questioning the quick flip at the time
TheHurl Site Manager Posted December 31, 2018 Posted December 31, 2018 I like Connor, good kid. For a College senior, who never played in winter, and has no real tools he did well.
glory Old-Timey Member Posted December 31, 2018 Posted December 31, 2018 You mention the 0.5 reliever seasons in 15-16 but not the 2.4 WAR year he had immediately after as a starter? Richard is anything but sexy but he's pitching depth, of the slightly below average to average variety. I didn’t mention it because I don’t think there’s any chance in hell he will come close to that again, especially in the AL East. He seems like someone who will get torched in this division. As a reliever I think he might be more valuable but the Jays might be more worried about the innings than the value/role. For $1.5m and a nothing prospect, it’s not a bad deal.
BigBounceyBlueBalls Old-Timey Member Posted December 31, 2018 Posted December 31, 2018 Nope Fake News !!! Nothing to see Here ! Sometimes Bad is Bad !!! And this is Both !!!
DigitalRock Old-Timey Member Posted December 31, 2018 Posted December 31, 2018 Looking forward to the facebook comments.
P2F Old-Timey Member Posted December 31, 2018 Posted December 31, 2018 Nope Fake News !!! Nothing to see Here ! Sometimes Bad is Bad !!! And this is Both !!! https://www.radioscouts.com/blog/blue-jays-add-underrated-pitching-depth-in-shoemaker-richard
saskjayfan Old-Timey Member Posted December 31, 2018 Posted December 31, 2018 This is a zero upside, zero downside move. The Jays could have signed Lynn for 3 for 30, but that came with both upside and downside risk. Instead we got a guy who won't help in the future, but he won't hurt the future either. I just don't see how the Jays are going to compete in 2 or 3 years unless they take a few chances. Maybe next year we will see some them gamble a bit more.
John_Havok Old-Timey Member Posted December 31, 2018 Posted December 31, 2018 0 downside....basically 0 cost.... doesn't really move the needle....casual fans with no brains losing their s***.... Yup, checks all the expected boxes for 2019. Makes it a winner in my books.
Abomination Old-Timey Member Posted December 31, 2018 Posted December 31, 2018 This is a zero upside, zero downside move. The Jays could have signed Lynn for 3 for 30, but that came with both upside and downside risk. Instead we got a guy who won't help in the future, but he won't hurt the future either. I just don't see how the Jays are going to compete in 2 or 3 years unless they take a few chances. Maybe next year we will see some them gamble a bit more. I wouldn't say zero upside. He's a cheap vet who could very plausibly post an ERA slightly under 4 with some good babip luck. That could return a McKinney or Teoscar type player at the deadline imo.
saskjayfan Old-Timey Member Posted December 31, 2018 Posted December 31, 2018 I wouldn't say zero upside. He's a cheap vet who could very plausibly post an ERA slightly under 4 with some good babip luck. That could return a McKinney or Teoscar type player at the deadline imo. That is a very optimistic outlook. I would be shocked if he posts an ERA under 4 in the AL East and get player anywhere close to McKinney or Teoscar. I don't see how Richard would fit on a team in a playoff race. Who's going to trade for him. I could see shoemaker bringing a return, but not Richard.
Abomination Old-Timey Member Posted December 31, 2018 Posted December 31, 2018 That is a very optimistic outlook. I would be shocked if he posts an ERA under 4 in the AL East and get player anywhere close to McKinney or Teoscar. I don't see how Richard would fit on a team in a playoff race. Who's going to trade for him. I could see shoemaker bringing a return, but not Richard. He'd be more for the stretch drive, and could probably fill a slot in the pen beyond that if necessary. His ground ball ability would be the attraction, especially in a band box. He's projected at a 4.14 xFIP, and had 3.76 in 2017. It's not hard to imagine that a little babip luck would produce something like that.
saskjayfan Old-Timey Member Posted December 31, 2018 Posted December 31, 2018 He'd be more for the stretch drive, and could probably fill a slot in the pen beyond that if necessary. His ground ball ability would be the attraction, especially in a band box. He's projected at a 4.14 xFIP, and had 3.76 in 2017. It's not hard to imagine that a little babip luck would produce something like that. He's a more than a year older than Tulo. He's moving from San Diego to Rogers Centre. He's going to lead the league in homers given up if he pitches more than 180 innings.
Orgfiller Old-Timey Member Posted December 31, 2018 Posted December 31, 2018 He's a more than a year older than Tulo. He's moving from San Diego to Rogers Centre. He's going to lead the league in homers given up if he pitches more than 180 innings. He's an extreme groundball pitcher lol, he could have a 20% HR/FB ratio and he still wouldn't be close to being among the league worst.
JoJo Parker Dunedin Blue Jays - A SS On Tuesday, Parker was just 1-for-5, but the one hit was his first professional home run. Explore JoJo Parker News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now