Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Community Moderator
Posted
Arizona couldn't put on their big boy pants and just keep their franchise player? He'll be 32 in his first FA year. A contract shouldn't have been prohibitively expensive.
Posted
Arizona couldn't put on their big boy pants and just keep their franchise player? He'll be 32 in his first FA year. A contract shouldn't have been prohibitively expensive.

 

Assuming he has another Goldy type year, what would you expect his next deal to look like?

Community Moderator
Posted
Assuming he has another Goldy type year, what would you expect his next deal to look like?

 

Something like Altuve's 5/150 deal? Maybe 6 years instead of 5?

Posted
I have a lot of trouble believing in Luke Weaver as a legit starter...so yes s*** return. With that said Carson Kelly is a starting catcher right now with an upside bat. Give it 5 years and he's the best catcher in the history of the franchise.
Posted

Goldschmidt splits vs. NL Central:

 

vs. Cubs: .353/.471/.699

vs. Brewers: .366/.478/.652

vs. Pirates: .270/.387/.479

vs. Reds: .272/.355/.519

Posted
Arizona couldn't put on their big boy pants and just keep their franchise player? He'll be 32 in his first FA year. A contract shouldn't have been prohibitively expensive.

 

Isn't this just a matter of them rebuilding and need to add assets? Maximize the return for Goldy as there's no point keeping him through a rebuild and/or risking injury or him signing elsewhere?

 

I kinda think this is the market for good players without much control. Teams aren't giving up prospects anymore.

Posted
Arizona couldn't put on their big boy pants and just keep their franchise player? He'll be 32 in his first FA year. A contract shouldn't have been prohibitively expensive.

 

I think if they they were serious about keeping Goldy around and/or if Goldy wanted to stay, he would have been signed to an extension already. Considering it's only 1 year for Goldy, I don't think they did that bad. They got some controllable and cheap assets that are ready to contribute at the MLB level. Look at the JD situation this past season. Blue Jays pretty much got nothing for him after holding onto him for most of the 2018 season. I think we're seeing that players with only one year of control left aren't going to get the type of elite talent via trade.

Posted
I've quickly come around to like this return. All MLB ready pieces. With one having top ten in their position upside.

 

I remembered you being the biggest fan of the Cole return last off season so I was expecting you to like this for some of those same reasons.

Posted
I must be one of the only ones here to like this deal for Arizona. The market for 1B is garbage, none of the top tier teams needed one, and they're getting two MLB ready pieces with decent upside plus some other minor assets. I'm probably the high man on Weaver but for one year of Goldy I think this is a perfectly fine return.
Community Moderator
Posted
I think if they they were serious about keeping Goldy around and/or if Goldy wanted to stay, he would have been signed to an extension already. Considering it's only 1 year for Goldy, I don't think they did that bad. They got some controllable and cheap assets that are ready to contribute at the MLB level. Look at the JD situation this past season. Blue Jays pretty much got nothing for him after holding onto him for most of the 2018 season. I think we're seeing that players with only one year of control left aren't going to get the type of elite talent via trade.

 

I don’t even dislike the return. I’d just be pissed if I were a D’Backs fan that my team couldn’t figure out a way to keep him around.

Posted
I've quickly come around to like this return. All MLB ready pieces. With one having top ten in their position upside.

 

Combined WAR between Carson Kelly and Luke Weaver could possibly could match Goldy (if we have Goldy at around 5 WAR next season). I don't think Goldy is a 6-7+ WAR player anymore. Alongside, Kelly and Weaver are under club control and are at a cheap price for the next several years, whereas the D'Backs likely weren't going to re-sign Goldy to begin with. I like the deal for both sides to be honest. The Cards are in a position to win now, and still have a solid farm system even after this trade. They could afford trading those pieces for one year of Goldy. For Arizona, they get two young MLB ready pieces under club control and at a cheap price. Both aren't anything special (Weaver more of a mid-rotation type starter at best; Kelly has upside to be a Top-10 catcher in baseball). Arizona probably could also sign a cheap 1B this offseason or trade for one (e.g. Justin Smoak) and still be somewhat decent.

Posted
I don’t even dislike the return. I’d just be pissed if I were a D’Backs fan that my team couldn’t figure out a way to keep him around.

 

As a D'Backs fan, I would be pissed as well. If Arizona were serious, they should have already re-signed him to a contract extension last year.

Posted
I think you have to get back at least one young player who is more of a sure thing (if a young player can even be a sure thing). But Weaver/Kelly both have too many question marks to really love this trade from ARZ's standpoint in my opinion. I mean, the Cards didn't even have much leverage here as both Weaver and Kelly had a seemingly limited future in the organization.

 

ARZ also has Miroglio and Varsho in the minors and both could be big league catchers.

 

If Goldy had 2+ years left, it's an awful return. With only 1 year left, his age and the chance of re-signing him very unlikely, I don't think Arizona did that bad. Not crazy about the return as well, but I think its decent. Likely don't get this type of deal at the July trade deadline.

Posted
I must be one of the only ones here to like this deal for Arizona. The market for 1B is garbage, none of the top tier teams needed one, and they're getting two MLB ready pieces with decent upside plus some other minor assets. I'm probably the high man on Weaver but for one year of Goldy I think this is a perfectly fine return.

 

I like Weaver as well. I think this is a very good return for one year of Goldy. Now from a fantasy perspective, Weaver going to ARI is not what I wanted to see.

Posted
I like Weaver as well. I think this is a very good return for one year of Goldy. Now from a fantasy perspective, Weaver going to ARI is not what I wanted to see.

 

Oh man, jays4life19 is gonna be all over you pointing out the humidor at Chase Field.

Community Moderator
Posted
Oh man, jays4life19 is gonna be all over you pointing out the humidor at Chase Field.

 

Lol, I was going to post this

Posted
Better to get something than nothing. Blue Jays could have got Jack Flaherty for Donaldson and ended up with Julian Merryweather. Take the best package you can and run imo.
Posted

I've come around on this deal for Arizona, I don't hate it for them anymore.

 

I do like it for St. Louis though. Adding Goldy to their lineup is f***ing hugee.

Posted
I think you have to get back at least one young player who is more of a sure thing (if a young player can even be a sure thing). But Weaver/Kelly both have too many question marks to really love this trade from ARZ's standpoint in my opinion. I mean, the Cards didn't even have much leverage here as both Weaver and Kelly had a seemingly limited future in the organization.

 

ARZ also has Miroglio and Varsho in the minors and both could be big league catchers.

 

Miroglio is less than a year younger than Kelly and has 2 year sample behind him. He's still a work in progress, even though his ability to call a game hasn't been questioned.

 

Varsho is all bat still. He can't throw and he still hasn't made it to AA ball. He's probably 3 away as a catcher at best and that's if the numbers aren't a factor of Recreation Park

Posted
Miroglio is less than a year younger than Kelly and has 2 year sample behind him. He's still a work in progress, even though his ability to call a game hasn't been questioned.

 

Varsho is all bat still. He can't throw and he still hasn't made it to AA ball. He's probably 3 away as a catcher at best and that's if the numbers aren't a factor of Recreation Park

 

Varsho is supposed to be easily athletic enough to move elsewhere if need be

Posted
Varsho is supposed to be easily athletic enough to move elsewhere if need be

 

and trading for Kelly likely allows for that. I think his athleticism and bat will be always be beyond his timelines of a catcher. Have you ever heard of a catcher who's legs are miles ahead of his arm.

Posted
and trading for Kelly likely allows for that. I think his athleticism and bat will be always be beyond his timelines of a catcher. Have you ever heard of a catcher who's legs are miles ahead of his arm.

 

His scouting report is definitely unique. I absolutely agree that it makes sense to add a young MLB catcher in Kelly and then move Varsho off the position to try and get his bat (and legs) in the lineup sooner.

Posted
Return is fine, more surprising is who he was traded to. Cards have some holes and Molina will be 37 come July. This is a very un-Cards like move.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...