G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted June 3, 2016 Posted June 3, 2016 Thoughts? Which team and why? All teams were supposedly built to win and have come up short
RealAccountant Old-Timey Member Posted June 3, 2016 Posted June 3, 2016 Last 3 years meaning 2013 - 2015 or 2014 - 2016
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted June 3, 2016 Author Posted June 3, 2016 Last 3 years meaning 2013 - 2015 or 2014 - 2016 Not this season, so 2013-2015
glory Old-Timey Member Posted June 3, 2016 Posted June 3, 2016 Considering the amount of prospects traded, I'd say the Jays. You can't trade that many prospects in 3 years and have one playoff appearance for it. At least the other teams just overpaid free agents for the most part.
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted June 3, 2016 Author Posted June 3, 2016 I say Nationals. Picked almost every year to make the WS and have done s*** all. Have the best player in baseball and a very good starting rotation on paper but can't seem to win anything. Disaster all around. Dodgers at least usually make the playoffs, though with that payroll and Kershaw.... they should probably have more to show for it.
baseballsss Verified Member Posted June 3, 2016 Posted June 3, 2016 I say Nationals. Picked almost every year to make the WS and have done s*** all. Have the best player in baseball and a very good starting rotation on paper but can't seem to win anything. Disaster all around. Dodgers at least usually make the playoffs, though with that payroll and Kershaw.... they should probably have more to show for it. Not sure how anyone can not say the Nationals..
Sammy225 Old-Timey Member Posted June 3, 2016 Posted June 3, 2016 Not sure how anyone can not say the Nationals.. This and also The amount of money spent by the dodgers is atrocious so you would hope to see them in the NLCS at least.... But i would say the Nats.
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted June 3, 2016 Author Posted June 3, 2016 Angels I don't think many had great expectations for them though
Dick_Pole Old-Timey Member Posted June 3, 2016 Posted June 3, 2016 Nationals for sure. The Pittsburgh Penguins of the MLB without the World Series appearances. Was a miserable team for years to pick up the #1 picks and have gotten how much value out of Harper and Strasburg?
Maahfaace Verified Member Posted June 3, 2016 Posted June 3, 2016 Yanks and Sox might not have had realistic chances at competing for a championship because of bone head signings, but those bloated payrolls gotta at least get em on the vote list.
Dick_Pole Old-Timey Member Posted June 3, 2016 Posted June 3, 2016 Yanks and Sox might not have had realistic chances at competing for a championship because of bone head signings, but those bloated payrolls gotta at least get em on the vote list. ??? Red Sox won in 2013. Winning a World Series in one of the three years automatically disqualifies your team for being considered as disappointing. I disagree with the Yankees as well. Their team was built to win in 2009 and they did do that. The bloated payroll you see now was a result of the attempt to win back then.
Governator Community Moderator Posted June 3, 2016 Posted June 3, 2016 Dodgers. Like really we complain? Their payroll is DOUBLE ours and they have Clayton Kershaw with no ring to show for it. That's going all in and failing.
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted June 3, 2016 Posted June 3, 2016 Not sure how anyone can not say the Nationals.. Easy, they just click the button next to a different team. I said Dodgers because Mike Rizzo is an idiot. I don't expect much from the Nats and there's a lot of fluff between Harper, Strasburg and Scherzer.
baseballsss Verified Member Posted June 3, 2016 Posted June 3, 2016 Easy, they just click the button next to a different team. I said Dodgers because Mike Rizzo is an idiot. I don't expect much from the Nats and there's a lot of fluff between Harper, Strasburg and Scherzer. I knew someone was going to be a smartass. On paper the Nationals were the most complete team. 1-5 were solid with 2 aces. Around the diamond they barely had a hole. The Dodgers were just really stupid with their money. ie. taking all the Red Sox contracts and giving Kemp the money he got. They are getting better now I wouldn't say they were expected to win it all over the Nationals the past 3 years. Just cause a team has a high payroll it doesn't mean the team underperformed. I could put together a team with the highest contracts in the MLB and I doubt they would do that great.
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted June 3, 2016 Author Posted June 3, 2016 ??? Red Sox won in 2013. Winning a World Series in one of the three years automatically disqualifies your team for being considered as disappointing. I disagree with the Yankees as well. Their team was built to win in 2009 and they did do that. The bloated payroll you see now was a result of the attempt to win back then. No one has really expected the Yankees to be great the last 3 years either.
Krylian Old-Timey Member Posted June 3, 2016 Posted June 3, 2016 I go with Dodgers, but just barely over the Nationals.
RealAccountant Old-Timey Member Posted June 3, 2016 Posted June 3, 2016 Jays considering we were twice odds in favorites to win the World Series according to Vegas
baseballsss Verified Member Posted June 3, 2016 Posted June 3, 2016 Jays considering we were twice odds in favorites to win the World Series according to Vegas That's actually a valid point
JoJo Parker Dunedin Blue Jays - A SS On Tuesday, Parker was just 1-for-5, but the one hit was his first professional home run. Explore JoJo Parker News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now