CrackerJack Verified Member Posted April 2, 2016 Posted April 2, 2016 if the Jays win the World Series this year, can Alex be named Executive of the Year again?
Smokey Verified Member Posted April 3, 2016 Posted April 3, 2016 86 I wouldn't be shocked to see them win 90+ games but realistically, it shouldn't be expected. I think many forget that they were 50-50 after 100 games last year and it took a lot of stars to line-up for them to win 93. Let's also not forget that the momentum gained during the last two months was largely fuelled by some ballsy moves that most likely doesn't get made without a desperate GM in charge.
KinofChaos Verified Member Posted April 3, 2016 Posted April 3, 2016 86 I wouldn't be shocked to see them win 90+ games but realistically, it shouldn't be expected. I think many forget that they were 50-50 after 100 games last year and it took a lot of stars to line-up for them to win 93. Let's also not forget that the momentum gained during the last two months was largely fuelled by some ballsy moves that most likely doesn't get made without a desperate GM in charge. It took a lot of stars lining up for the team to be 50-50 and a great run differential....lots of bad luck, it works both ways.
Smokey Verified Member Posted April 3, 2016 Posted April 3, 2016 It took a lot of stars lining up for the team to be 50-50 and a great run differential....lots of bad luck, it works both ways. Run differential wasn't as much of a factor as some make it out to be. Maybe they should have been a couple of games better than .500 but ultimately they were able to go on a run and win the close games they were losing earlier once they finally addressed the atrocious defense at SS and LF and acquired a frontline starter they desperately needed. This year's opening day roster obviously looks better on paper but they still need a lot of things to go their way in order to win 90+ games. A significant injury to either Stroman (who's never pitched more than 130 innings as a pro), Martin, Tulo, Donaldson or even Pillar would undoubtedly reduce their chances and I don't see this FO having much flexibility in terms of resources to be able to find an adequate replacement for any of those players.
KinofChaos Verified Member Posted April 3, 2016 Posted April 3, 2016 Run differential wasn't as much of a factor as some make it out to be. Maybe they should have been a couple of games better than .500 but ultimately they were able to go on a run and win the close games they were losing earlier once they finally addressed the atrocious defense at SS and LF and acquired a frontline starter they desperately needed. This year's opening day roster obviously looks better on paper but they still need a lot of things to go their way in order to win 90+ games. A significant injury to either Stroman (who's never pitched more than 130 innings as a pro), Martin, Tulo, Donaldson or even Pillar would undoubtedly reduce their chances and I don't see this FO having much flexibility in terms of resources to be able to find adequate replacements for those players. The Jays win/lose record in close games in the first half was mainly luck, and you said it yourself, this roster is way better then the one that started last season, defense alone will make a big difference.The rest of what you said can apply to any team in the majors. No they don't need a lot f things to go right to win 90, if most of this roster performs as they have historically and to their talent this is a 90+ win team. Obviously injuries and other factors can happen it's why they play the games.
KingKat Old-Timey Member Posted April 3, 2016 Posted April 3, 2016 Run differential wasn't as much of a factor as some make it out to be. Maybe they should have been a couple of games better than .500 but ultimately they were able to go on a run and win the close games they were losing earlier once they finally addressed the atrocious defense at SS and LF and acquired a frontline starter they desperately needed. This year's opening day roster obviously looks better on paper but they still need a lot of things to go their way in order to win 90+ games. A significant injury to either Stroman (who's never pitched more than 130 innings as a pro), Martin, Tulo, Donaldson or even Pillar would undoubtedly reduce their chances and I don't see this FO having much flexibility in terms of resources to be able to find an adequate replacement for any of those players. Stroman and Donaldson would be the worst of those. Too bad Danny V. was deemed a jerk or something because he would be a huge 3B depth upgrade. Martin would also be pretty bad since Tony Sanchez might very well be terrible. A Tulo injury seems inevitable. Hopefully, it comes after Travis returns. Pompey would probably make the Pillar injury the most navigable of those you mentioned. The first three would be pretty catastrophic.
TheHurl Site Manager Posted April 3, 2016 Posted April 3, 2016 Run differential wasn't as much of a factor as some make it out to be. Maybe they should have been a couple of games better than .500 but ultimately they were able to go on a run and win the close games they were losing earlier once they finally addressed the atrocious defense at SS and LF and acquired a frontline starter they desperately needed. This year's opening day roster obviously looks better on paper but they still need a lot of things to go their way in order to win 90+ games. A significant injury to either Stroman (who's never pitched more than 130 innings as a pro), Martin, Tulo, Donaldson or even Pillar would undoubtedly reduce their chances and I don't see this FO having much flexibility in terms of resources to be able to find an adequate replacement for any of those players. My ranking of devastatingness (real word in my world) of injuries for the Jays. 1. Donaldson (all back ups are replacement level) 2. Martin (not ready to see what Jimenez has) 3. Bautista (moves Saunders to RF, Pompey up?) 4. Tulo (more so before Travis' return but still a bad one) 5. Edwin (short term injuries, not really concerned...long term I don't want to see both Smokabello every day) 6. Stroman (I just really like him being there, but it's not a season ender for him to go down) 7. Dickey (his innings will likely be needed) 8. Cecil (don't want anyone else in high leverage late situations against lefties) 9. Sanchez (I can't take another year where we did a small sample size from him. Lets find out what he has and end the debate)
Spanky99 Old-Timey Member Posted October 2, 2016 Posted October 2, 2016 89 wins Put me down for 89 89 It is an underestimation so that I can be happy when im wrong... assuming they dont stink for some reason Bump Wieners!
Jonn Old-Timey Member Posted October 2, 2016 Posted October 2, 2016 94 wins I was predicting Cleveland's win total.
bones10 Old-Timey Member Posted October 2, 2016 Posted October 2, 2016 92 Wins for the 2016 Blue Jays! I was close.
bones10 Old-Timey Member Posted October 2, 2016 Posted October 2, 2016 feels like yesterday this thread started lol.
fatcowxlive Old-Timey Member Posted October 3, 2016 Posted October 3, 2016 89 wins Hey ang can you help me pick my lottery numbers? Thanks!
Dick_Pole Old-Timey Member Posted October 3, 2016 Posted October 3, 2016 feels like yesterday this thread started lol. Funny, because it feels like I've aged a year since Ubaldo took apart the hitters a few days ago.
JoJo Parker Dunedin Blue Jays - A SS On Tuesday, Parker was just 1-for-5, but the one hit was his first professional home run. Explore JoJo Parker News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now