Regression to the mean thread

[G-Snarls]

Also, 6 months of Stroman instead of 1 month of Stroman

[G-Snarls]

[Olerud363]

Also, 6 months of Stroman instead of 1 month of Stroman

 

Stroman regresses to 4 months

Hutchison regresses to 12-10 4.12

 

you just go back to where you came from...

if you have 2 girlfriends a month and one month you get 10 you regress to 3..

 

cuz you go back to average, but you 10 indicates you might of learned a bit more how to pick up girls, so you go back to average + a little bit

 

if you have 10 girlfriends a month and one month you get 2 you regress to 8

 

cuz you go back to average, but the 2 indicates something might of changed, like you got uglier, or older, or married.

[Olerud363]

you go s*** 1 time a day on average, but one day go 10, you regress to 1.2... cuz you go back to average, with a little bit extra cuz maybe a infection subtly changes your microbiome

 

you go s*** 10 times a day on average, but one day go 1, you regress to 2... cuz probably you figure out something, like you have celiac disease, and you solved problem

 

sometimes it's not symetrical... if good reason for outlier, you don't regress very far back.

[Governator]

Stroman regresses to 4 months

Hutchison regresses to 12-10 4.12

 

you just go back to where you came from...

if you have 2 girlfriends a month and one month you get 10 you regress to 3..

 

cuz you go back to average, but you 10 indicates you might of learned a bit more how to pick up girls, so you go back to average + a little bit

 

if you have 10 girlfriends a month and one month you get 2 you regress to 8

 

cuz you go back to average, but the 2 indicates something might of changed, like you got uglier, or older, or married.

 

 

The problem with your projection is that sometimes you have friends with benefits who don't classify as girlfriends, therefore you beat your FAP I mean FIP season after season making your calculations irrelevant by today's advanced statistics.

[Angrioter]

C'mon bro, we've been through this before. Projections are not always accurate.

 

I know buddy, he could be worse than that -31 wRC+

[Angrioter]

The problem with your projection is that sometimes you have friends with benefits who don't classify as girlfriends, therefore you beat your FAP I mean FIP season after season making your calculations irrelevant by today's advanced statistics.

 

http://i.imgur.com/VlDMn.gif

[Olerud363]

The problem with your projection is that sometimes you have friends with benefits who don't classify as girlfriends, therefore you beat your FAP I mean FIP season after season making your calculations irrelevant by today's advanced statistics.

 

I agree with your assessment... I was just trying to be family friendly... given that there is a number of minors on the site, and also maybe a few who are older but saving them selves for marriage... so these people might just go on dates with girlfriends to movies and starbucks and not go any further.

[Cyborg]

I know buddy, he could be worse than that -31 wRC+

You should probably stop using your + and - wRC+ numbers. They are extremely confusing. I literally thought you meant -31 wRC+ the first time.

[Angrioter]

You should probably stop using your + and - wRC+ numbers. They are extremely confusing. I literally thought you meant -31 wRC+ the first time.

 

Below and under 100, then.

[Cyborg]

Below and under 100, then.

Just use the actual number.

[TheHurl]

anyone remember when this board had insightful conversation and anger. I miss that.

[BTS]

anyone remember when this board had insightful conversation and anger. I miss that.

 

Anger yes. Insightful conversation? Maybe in the league threads.

[Laika]

I think I might regress to the mean this season.

 

I'll start off by saying - f*** you all, every one of you. I hate this entire community.

[Cyborg]

I think I might regress to the mean this season.

 

I'll start off by saying - f*** you all, every one of you. I hate this entire community.

Aggression to the mean.

[crazy47larry]

ang starts a thread.

the thread turns to s***.

regression to the mean.

[Angrioter]

ang starts a thread.

the thread turns to s***.

regression to the mean.

The entire board will regress to the mean when the season start, and Sanchez throws 6 scoreless innings in his first outing........... 5 walks, 3 K's

[Maahfaace]

The entire board will regress to the mean when the season start, and Sanchez throws 6 scoreless innings in his first outing........... 5 walks, 3 K's

 

Be honest Ang, you made this thread to s*** on Sanchez some more. You should turn that hatred on to your goat instead.

[Angrioter]

Be honest Ang, you made this thread to s*** on Sanchez some more. You should turn that hatred on to your goat instead.

 

I traded for him BBDL. I like him

[G-Snarls]

Be honest Ang, you made this thread to s*** on Sanchez some more. You should turn that hatred on to your goat instead.

 

Or his 3rd ranking side bitch

[Jimcanuck]

I traded for him BBDL. I like him

 

Welcome to the bandwagon

 

Former haters are welcome

[Angrioter]

Welcome to the bandwagon

 

Former haters are welcome

 

I traded for him because I think he's going to be a great bullpen arm.

[Boxcar]

I think I might regress to the mean this season.

 

I'll start off by saying - f*** you all, every one of you. I hate this entire community.

 

eat dicks

[Lil Looper]

I expect estrada to pitch at a #5 level

EE and Jose wont break an 900OPS

Colabello easily is in triple a by july, i just dont see it

[Orgfiller]

EE's season last year was very similar to his previous 3 seasons. The only reason to expect regression would be due to his age

That would be more of a decline than a regression anyways.

[Stangstag]

I expect estrada to pitch at a #5 level

EE and Jose wont break an 900OPS

Colabello easily is in triple a by july, i just dont see it

 

High85?

[labadee]

Gavin Floyd would be my pick

[500LevelSTH]

No Jay will hit 40 or more HR, unless they do

[jaysblue1]

with boston much improved this season it's going to be a struggle for the jays this year. I think third place is realistic though.

[Praxis]

ang starts a thread.

the thread turns to s***.

regression to the mean.

 

It's more like this:

 

Thread starts on interesting premise

Everyone agrees on something usually unrelated

Someone disagrees and the swarm jumps all over them

Mods are called for

Thread degenerates into rating female sportscasters TNA

Spanky makes a laconic comment that adds nothing

Thread is locked or forgotten

 

Rinse and repeat...