Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Maybe we shouldn't have drafted a pitcher with a screw in his elbow. This blows.

 

Non of his injuries are even related to his elbow??

Posted

I say we just forget that Pearson exists.

 

If/When he's ever ready...I mean really ready, call him back up. But I'm not going to get too excited or expect much of anything anymore. If it happens... Awesome.

Old-Timey Member
Posted

Lazaro Estrada, RHP, Toronto Blue Jays

Level & Affiliate: Low-A Dunedin Age: 22 Org Rank: NR FV: 35 Line: 2.2 IP (relief), 3 H, 0 R, 3 BB, 4 K

 

 

Notes

I don’t know anything about Estrada except what I was able to glean from Wednesday’s data output. Estrada’s curveball averaged just shy of 3,400 rpm. If that’s what he’s capable of doing consistently, he’d be comfortably atop the major league average curveball spin rate leaderboard. I’ve never had this kind of immediate access to data before, so I’m not sure how spontaneously aggressive to be with putting someone like Estrada on a prospect list after just looking at pitch data without ever having laid eyes on him. But even though he hasn’t performed at an elite level, he’s someone who needs to be monitored because of his talent for spin.

Verified Member
Posted
Solid outing by Adam Kloffenstein today. 6 IP, 2H, 1ER, 2BB, 4K. 0.79 ERA through 3 starts now.
Posted

Posted
I see Curtis Taylor got promoted to AAA and pitched for the Bisons last night, striking out 5 batters in 2 innings pitched.

 

What kind of velocity does he bring with the FB?

 

Taylor’s stretch with Toronto in the Fall was the first time the org’s dev group had really gotten to see him throw in person, as he was hurt when they acquired him from Tampa Bay for Eric Sogard. It was the second time Taylor was dealt; the first was when the Rays acquired him from Arizona for Brad Boxberger. Taylor was shut down and given a PRP injection to remedy a UCL strain without surgery and didn’t pitch the second half of 2019. Before he was shelved and traded, he was typically throwing 35 to 50 pitches once every three to five days, seemingly in preparation for some kind of multi-inning role, and that seems to be what he’ll be doing for Toronto. At full speed he works in the mid-90s, generates huge extension, and bends in some above-average sliders. He was more 91-93 at instructs. (Fall Instructional League)

Posted
I say we just forget that Pearson exists.

 

If/When he's ever ready...I mean really ready, call him back up. But I'm not going to get too excited or expect much of anything anymore. If it happens... Awesome.

 

Yeah, that's kind of where I am, too. Whatever. I am more excited about Manoah and SWR.

Posted
If Pearson wasn't currently injured, I suspect most would vote for Pearson. Keep in mind, in baseball injuries can strike anyone at anytime. This is a poll in a snapshot of time.
Posted
If Pearson wasn't currently injured, I suspect most would vote for Pearson. Keep in mind, in baseball injuries can strike anyone at anytime. This is a poll in a snapshot of time.

 

Easy Jim, we understand. It's obvious, no???

 

Wrong thread, no???

Posted
If Pearson wasn't currently injured, I suspect most would vote for Pearson. Keep in mind, in baseball injuries can strike anyone at anytime. This is a poll in a snapshot of time.

 

This poll also forces you to reconcile your own thoughts on Pearson's injury pattern. Are they all just flukes...or is there more to it than that.

Posted
This poll also forces you to reconcile your own thoughts on Pearson's injury pattern. Are they all just flukes...or is there more to it than that.

 

Yeah, it's a good poll question. I stayed with Big Nate, their a 1a 1b scenario, SWR will be a 1c soon, good problem to have.

 

ETA: This is in the wrong thread, it's all JimmyC's fault.

Posted
If Pearson wasn't currently injured, I suspect most would vote for Pearson. Keep in mind, in baseball injuries can strike anyone at anytime. This is a poll in a snapshot of time.

 

Has anybody tried making another team an offer for a big star?

 

Like if we want Kris Bryant would the cubs fans want Pearson or Manoah as part of the package? (not trying to debate whether we should trade for Bryant, just curious which prospect other fans would want, that would be a good tell)

Posted
Has anybody tried making another team an offer for a big star?

 

Like if we want Kris Bryant would the cubs fans want Pearson or Manoah as part of the package? (not trying to debate whether we should trade for Bryant, just curious which prospect other fans would want, that would be a good tell)

 

They would probably take either. And would get neither. Wonder what Bryant would cost though? He'd look some nice over there at 3B.

Posted
They would probably take either. And would get neither. Wonder what Bryant would cost though? He'd look some nice over there at 3B.

 

We could probably get Anthony Rendon for free.

Posted

 

Gabriel Moreno has been exceptional, would be really surprised if he doesn’t make the midseason top 100.

 

100

Gabriel Moreno

Blue Jays

C

Notes:

Tools: Hit: 55 | Power: 45 | Run: 30 | Fielding: 50 | Arm: 55

Skinny: On a team littered with Top 100 prospects, Moreno’s start to the season has been loud. As of May 16, Moreno, who entered the year as the third-youngest player in the Double-A Northeast League boasted a circuit-best .444 average and placed third with a .524 on-base percentage. He’d also thrown out 40% of runners trying to steal.

 

That didn’t take long.

 

The tools are a bit off in my opinion. They’re a bit conservative on new prospects that enter the rankings. Should be closer to:

Hit: 60 | Power: 50 | Run: 45 | Fielding: 50 | Arm: 55

Verified Member
Posted

8 top 100 prospects is nuts for a team that has graduated as many prospects as we have the last couple years.

 

Gotta be the #2 or #3 farm system I would think.

Posted
We could probably get Anthony Rendon for free.

 

Bryant should also be cheapish. And we wouldn't have to commit money past this year.

Posted
Bryant should also be cheapish. And we wouldn't have to commit money past this year.

 

Yes, I just wanted to point out the Halos likely have another albatross contract. $35M a year to 2027......

Community Moderator
Posted
8 top 100 prospects is nuts for a team that has graduated as many prospects as we have the last couple years.

 

Gotta be the #2 or #3 farm system I would think.

 

Bottom 5 per Fangraphs guy LMFAO

Posted
8 top 100 prospects is nuts for a team that has graduated as many prospects as we have the last couple years.

 

Gotta be the #2 or #3 farm system I would think.

 

AND the Jays have a LOT of young. low minors, talent. I love what Shapiro and company has done. And we are starting to see the rewards of the process...we should have a young competitive team indefinitely.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...