Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

GDT(3/3): Baltimore Orilols @ Your Toronto Blue Jays - Tillman vs Hutchison - 7:07 PM

fatcowxlive

By fatcowxlive
in Toronto Blue Jays Talk

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 758
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Statman FCL Blue Jays

Statman

Verified Member
Posted
Posted
Did anyone look at Zauns suit and think that pocket square looked like he stuffed a dead Oriole in there? Goddammit I love it!
GNick49 Prep Ball

GNick49

Verified Member
Posted
Posted
Hendriks today:

81.00 ERA

-2.93 FIP

-2.93 xFIP

They need to get him out of there. He opened the door for the Orioles to get back in.

Statman FCL Blue Jays

Statman

Verified Member
Posted
Posted
I really think evaluating a pitcher based on xFIP in 0.1 IP is completely pointless. Just my opinion.

 

Yes, in that context you are correct.

reedjohnsonfan Dunedin Blue Jays

reedjohnsonfan

Verified Member
Posted
Posted
But still more useful than ERA in 0.1 IP!

 

Both are irrelevant. IMO the only way to evaluate a pitcher in a small sample, is by watching closely. I had someone claim that Eovaldi was pitching "ok" through 4 innings a couple of weeks back because of his xFIP when it was clear he was pitching well at the time.

Captain Adama FCL Blue Jays

Captain Adama

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted
You guys are joking right? Week oppo grounder, another grounder, a soft line drive and a nice K.

 

This is coming from the same people who thought Sanchez's start was decent last night....

reedjohnsonfan Dunedin Blue Jays

reedjohnsonfan

Verified Member
Posted
Posted
Watching tells you nothing as well.

I wasn't evaluating anything, was just showing how huge the gap in a small sample can be. Maybe I should have said that.

 

Ok, agree to disagree then. If some posters think xFIP is the only way to evaluate a pitcher's start then so be it, but I think that is wrong. Let's agree to disagree.

Captain Adama FCL Blue Jays

Captain Adama

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted
Watching tells you nothing as well.

I wasn't evaluating anything, was just showing how huge the gap in a small sample can be. Maybe I should have said that.

 

Give reedjohnsonfan some credit, Hendriks looked pretty good to me, it's not like the balls that were hit off him were hard....

reedjohnsonfan Dunedin Blue Jays

reedjohnsonfan

Verified Member
Posted
Posted
Well xFIP is actually vey flawed, but trying to make sense of things by watching is just back-pedalling.

 

I don't think so. It's important to use stats and watch IMO, but if you don't think so, that's fine.

reedjohnsonfan Dunedin Blue Jays

reedjohnsonfan

Verified Member
Posted
Posted
Give reedjohnsonfan some credit, Hendriks looked pretty good to me, it's not like the balls that were hit off him were hard....

 

I'm not talking about Hendriks, he looked fine. I just thought it was weird when someone posted Eovaldi was looking just "ok" a couple weeks back because of his xFIP...

gruber92 Buffalo Bisons

gruber92

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted
Well xFIP is actually vey flawed, but trying to make sense of things by watching is just back-pedalling. It just creates bias.

 

It all depends on who is doing the evaluating.

gruber92 Buffalo Bisons

gruber92

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted
Professional scouts will never beat reliable metrics.

 

Meh.. Makes things robotic and boring. So basically the games don't even have to be watched to get a proper evaluation?

 

Call me old school, but i just think there is more to evaluating a player than plain simple metrics.

saskjayfan Dunedin Blue Jays

saskjayfan

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted
Professional scouts will never beat reliable metrics.

 

reliable metrics will never beat the organization that uses both reliable metrics and above average scouting.

L54 Vancouver Canadians

L54

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted
reliable metrics will never beat the organization that uses both reliable metrics and above average scouting.

 

No s***.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

Become a Caretaker

  • Member Statistics

    20,997
    Total Members
    48,845
    Most Online
    Sarahh
    Newest Member
    Sarahh
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...