Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Old-Timey Member
Posted
You specifically said end point was arbitrary, and you were wrong. I could easily go back and pick June 1 as the starting point and the conclusion would be the same... they are all sucking. But this way had more value in showing WHEN they started sucking.

 

I'm not even going to argue what I said with you cause you're just trying to distract from the point that you're just deliberately misusing stats to fit your agenda. Just the worst kind of thing. They aren't sucking, they're sucking since the point that you specifically chose. Overall, they are useful contributors, I don't give a f*** what your agenda is. Use the entire sample available.

  • Replies 305
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Melky Cabrera since May 13: .241 .293 .668.......... SUCK

 

Brett Lawrie since May 16: .231 .278 .645....... SUCK

 

Steve Tolleson since May 27: .167 .231 .397...... SUCK

 

Adam Lind since June 3: .263 .349 .691....... SUCK

 

Jaun Francisco since May 21: .161 .217 .627........ SUCK

 

Josh Thole since May 1: .189 .318 .534...... SUCK

 

 

Only Reyes, Bautista, Navarro and Kratz have been consistent / not bad.

 

Not only did you use molecular and arbitrary sample sizes, you used a different sample for every player? http://i.imgur.com/py2PxcN.gif

 

How much time did that rubbish take you?

Posted
Not only did you use molecular sample sizes, you used a different sample for every player? http://i.imgur.com/py2PxcN.gif

 

How much time did that rubbish take you?

 

3 minutes?

 

And I pulled up the rage thread for a reason.

Posted
I'm not even going to argue what I said with you cause you're just trying to distract from the point that you're just deliberately misusing stats to fit your agenda. Just the worst kind of thing. They aren't sucking, they're sucking since the point that you specifically chose. Overall, they are useful contributors, I don't give a f*** what your agenda is. Use the entire sample available.

 

You're clearly a square / tight ass - making this kind of stink in the rage/vent thread.

Posted
June Swoon

 

f*** this team, bunch of f***ers

 

Decide to s*** the bed in Yankees stadium and can't hit off a f***ing no name pitcher.

 

Typical ********, Rogers=Satan.

 

Regression to the mean, more like regression to s***.

 

Didn't this guy already receive a warning today?

Old-Timey Member
Posted
.691 is his OPS dummy

 

Then what f***ing numbers did you post at least put a header

 

You're clearly a square / tight ass - making this kind of stink in the rage/vent thread.

 

It's a venting thread, I'm venting about your lack of understanding about sample size

Posted
June Swoon

 

f*** this team, bunch of f***ers

 

Decide to s*** the bed in Yankees stadium and can't hit off a f***ing no name pitcher.

 

Typical ********, Rogers=Satan.

 

Regression to the mean, more like regression to s***.

 

No offense to Santan please.

Posted
Then what f***ing numbers did you post at least put a header

 

Last time I checked AVG / OBP / OPS are pretty standard slash line.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Last time I checked AVG / OBP / OPS are pretty standard slash line.

 

Lol wtf? Last I checked it was AVG/OBP/SLG. Not that I use those, but who the f*** uses AVG/OBP/OPS? I can calculate OPS just fine, I'm dumn but I can add, why not just put slugging like, I dunno, everyone, ever?

 

Doesn't even matter, still doesn't help that your samples are painful and hurt my soul.

Posted
You don't seem to get it/compute?

 

And you don't get that they've all been sucking for at least several weeks.

Posted
Lol wtf? Last I checked it was AVG/OBP/SLG. Not that I use those, but who the f*** uses AVG/OBP/OPS? I can calculate OPS just fine, I'm dumn but I can add, why not just put slugging like, I dunno, everyone, ever?

 

Doesn't even matter, still doesn't help that your samples are painful and hurt my soul.

 

Media posts these types of sample sizes all the time. I'm not judging their talent. I'm saying they are ALL sucking from X period until now... why does that hurt you? Seems pretty valid to show who is slumping when the team has been struggling.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
And you don't get that they've all been sucking for at least several weeks.

 

And you don't get that several weeks < the entire season in terms of importance.

 

Media posts these types of sample sizes all the time. I'm not judging their talent. I'm saying they are ALL sucking from X period... why does that hurt you?

 

I'm sorry but I would hope that you'd hold yourself to a higher standard than the likes of Barry god damn Davis. I know you're saying they're all sucking from X period. I'm saying that you're not looking at the right sample.

Posted

Jose Bautista, April 12 - May 6: | 325 - 467 - 578 - 1045 | RUTHIAN

 

Melky Cabrera, May 20 - May 22: | 462 - 533 - 1.077 - 1.610 | BONDSIAN

 

Edwin Encarnacion, April 25 - June 3: | 297 - 386 - 775 - 1161 | ENCARNACIAN

 

Adam Lind, April 1 - June 3: | 341 - 419 - 573 - 992 | PLATOONISH MUSALIAN

 

Jose Reyes on April 4, 2010 in New York Mets High-A Affiliate | 000 - 000 - 000 - 000 | ARENCIBIAN

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Jose Reyes on April 4, 2010 in New York Mets High-A Affiliate | 000 - 000 - 000 - 000 | ARENCIBIAN

 

Lmao that's f***ing great

 

Also, THAT'S how to format a slash line

Posted
Dogg, zee and whoever the f*** else. Give up, Spanky will find your ass, he clearly doesn't give a f*** whether he gets banned in the process too
Posted
And you don't get that several weeks < the entire season in terms of importance.

 

 

 

I'm sorry but I would hope that you'd hold yourself to a higher standard than the likes of Barry god damn Davis. I know you're saying they're all sucking from X period. I'm saying that you're not looking at the right sample.

 

I'm not evaluating the players. This is not Fangraphs 101. Why do you take it so personally? I'm just showing who's struggling and when it started (and vent/raging at the same time).

Posted
I'm not evaluating the players. This is not Fangraphs 101. Why do you take it so personally? I'm just showing who's struggling and when it started (and vent/raging at the same time).

 

This is such blatant backtracking. You didn't "show who's struggling" you wrote "SUCK" in all caps next to every player's name. Learn to put things into context.

Posted
http://i.imgur.com/DZa2uBY.png

 

That K/BB ratio...

 

http://fc03.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2013/230/1/5/the_best_tom_hanks_face_ever_by_unknownspartantommy-d6ipp22.jpg

Posted
This is such blatant backtracking. You didn't "show who's struggling" you wrote "SUCK" in all caps next to every player's name. Learn to put things into context.

 

Learn what a rage/vent thread is. Report back when you figure it out.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Learn what a rage/vent thread is. Report back when you figure it out.

 

We're raging/venting about your posts. :)

Posted
I'm not evaluating the players. This is not Fangraphs 101. Why do you take it so personally? I'm just showing who's struggling and when it started (and vent/raging at the same time).

What do you mean by 'struggling' though? It's not like the players you mentioned have experienced a change in talent level. They can be expected to perform as well tomorrow as at any other point in this season. Nothing that's happened in the arbitrary (and small) samples you've provided means anything. Players are who they are.

 

Once you realize this and stop getting hyped up over the stats the media feeds you, it makes the game a lot more enjoyable.

Posted
Learn what a rage/vent thread is. Report back when you figure it out.

 

The fact that you keep defending your idiocy is only going to fuel them, give up while you're really far behind.

Posted
The fact that you keep defending your idiocy is only going to fuel them, give up while you're really far behind.

 

No, no, he's right. And on that note...

 

936183_332933463502617_65400449_n.png

Old-Timey Member
Posted
No, no, he's right. And on that note...

 

936183_332933463502617_65400449_n.png

 

Strongly doubt we even got RISP 24 times against the Rays prior to this year

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...