Chappy Community Moderator Posted May 10, 2013 Posted May 10, 2013 he gets paid 5M a year, go away troll Tommy Milone gets paid 495K Do you see the problem now? Check your inbox.
GeorgiaPeach Verified Member Posted May 10, 2013 Posted May 10, 2013 it wasnt a matter of rest or saving him for future games, it was about saving him for this game in case a save opportunity arose later. So we werent forced to use Lincoln as a closer Kinda like the game where the Jays were down by a run to the Yankees a few years ago and sent Johnny f***ing McDonald to the plate in the 9th with two outs, expecting some offensive contribution on a non-Fathers Day game and leaving Randy Ruiz on the bench. Why, because if the Jays had've tied the game and gone to extras they may have had a weird defensive alignment. OMG, we can't have that happen.
GeorgiaPeach Verified Member Posted May 10, 2013 Posted May 10, 2013 huhh? how do you get that? CJ has been the best and most consistent player on this team Then you use him. You don't wait for a f***ing save opportunity. Hypothetical situation. Say you have the consensus best closer in all of baseball and one year the team never/rarely has a save chance. Does that mean you rarely use the guy who's been identified as the closer? That's a dumb fans way of looking at the situation.
LGBJ29 Verified Member Posted May 10, 2013 Posted May 10, 2013 Kinda like the game where the Jays were down by a run to the Yankees a few years ago and sent Johnny f***ing McDonald to the plate in the 9th with two outs, expecting some offensive contribution on a non-Fathers Day game and leaving Randy Ruiz on the bench. Why, because if the Jays had've tied the game and gone to extras they may have had a weird defensive alignment. OMG, we can't have that happen. Yeah i understand your point, I was just saying Gibbons non-use of Janssen tonight had nothing to do with the red sox series
o2cui2i Community Moderator Posted May 10, 2013 Posted May 10, 2013 Then you use him. You don't wait for a f***ing save opportunity. Hypothetical situation. Say you have the consensus best closer in all of baseball and one year the team never/rarely has a save chance. Does that mean you rarely use the guy who's been identified as the closer? That's a dumb fans way of looking at the situation. you get him into as many leverage "game on the line situations" as you. who know, maybe that attitude gets you some more important saves later in the year???
GeorgiaPeach Verified Member Posted May 10, 2013 Posted May 10, 2013 What? So you prefer to use Lincoln with the game on the line and save our best reliever to start off a fresh inning with significantly less pressure? That is losing logic right there. It's idiot logic Vik.
Chappy Community Moderator Posted May 10, 2013 Posted May 10, 2013 Let's assume Jansen was brought in and he got out of the inning. Let's say we score a run and then Lincoln is ran out there for the save opportunity. Regardless of the outcome,most baseball people would be laughing at Gibby prior to the inning starting. Managers will not use their closers in a tie game on the road because of the fear of a blown save occurring from the non closer,especially the likes of Lincoln. Yes Cecil was also available. Mathematically over a larger sample size,you will lose more often when using your closer on the road in a tie game. So tell me this, does Janssen probably get us out of that inning and give us a chance to win? If the answer is yes then that call just blew us the game. If the answer is no, then Janssen isn't good enough to be the closer. As for mathematically, please provide a source proving such claims. I would like to know what the probability of Janssen saving that game was after Lincoln already blew it compared to Lincolns chances after Janssen probably gets us out of the inning.
Chappy Community Moderator Posted May 10, 2013 Posted May 10, 2013 It's idiot logic Vik. I am dumfounded right now. It's better to save Janssen for a save opp that never comes? Old school management just cost us this game old school style.
Arkadium Verified Member Posted May 10, 2013 Posted May 10, 2013 Jays 29th w/ RISP.... CHEERS! That's .204 AVG, only behind the Cubbies.
Nox Verified Member Posted May 10, 2013 Posted May 10, 2013 Let's assume Jansen was brought in and he got out of the inning. Let's say we score a run and then Lincoln is ran out there for the save opportunity. Regardless of the outcome,most baseball people would be laughing at Gibby prior to the inning starting. Managers will not use their closers in a tie game on the road because of the fear of a blown save occurring from the non closer,especially the likes of Lincoln. Yes Cecil was also available. Mathematically over a larger sample size,you will lose more often when using your closer on the road in a tie game. This is literally all wrong. You use your best pitchers in the highest leverage situations you can. Bases loaded in the bottom of the 9th in a tie game is much higher leverage than your average save opp in extra innings. Don't go quoting "Math" when you clearly haven't done it or read any research on the matter.
crrr Verified Member Posted May 10, 2013 Posted May 10, 2013 Let's assume Jansen was brought in and he got out of the inning. Let's say we score a run and then Lincoln is ran out there for the save opportunity. Regardless of the outcome,most baseball people would be laughing at Gibby prior to the inning starting. Managers will not use their closers in a tie game on the road because of the fear of a blown save occurring from the non closer,especially the likes of Lincoln. Yes Cecil was also available. Mathematically over a larger sample size,you will lose more often when using your closer on the road in a tie game. You're putting way too much into Lincoln being blown up the next inning, chances are they would use somebody else. In a bases loaded scenario you really want to start looking at who is likely to be hit. You do raise the possibility that putting in new pitchers to bases loaded rarely works out, in that situation it may be true that its best to go with Lincoln. However, the Jays have a few relievers capable of having clean innings at all points in the game, and so if Janssen, who is a much superior reliever is comfortable in that situation to perform to his abilities (especially better than Lincoln, who obviously was not fit to handle it). They would also have the possibility of a second inning of Janssen, if they do score a run.
GD Old-Timey Member Posted May 10, 2013 Posted May 10, 2013 Hey! You're missing someone.... Joonel f***ing sucks, sorry bro
Metallijay Verified Member Posted May 10, 2013 Posted May 10, 2013 rasmus 3 more k's, cannot hot a low breaking ball to save his lfie, everytime pitches throw him the same pitch he never adjusts.
GeorgiaPeach Verified Member Posted May 10, 2013 Posted May 10, 2013 Jays 29th w/ RISP.... CHEERS! That's .204 AVG, only behind the Cubbies. That's what happens when you get a jack happy lineup. They don't care about base hits or moving runners. Its all about how can I be a hero.
fatcowxlive Old-Timey Member Posted May 10, 2013 Author Posted May 10, 2013 hit off a pitcher who never should have been in the game. how about we talk about him not making a single play right to let the jays come back from a 7-0 deficit? Escobar single handily ( no pun intended) gave the jays that win. with escobar you can get good, bad or really Fing ugly. His hand wasn't going to be 100% until Wednesday as reported by the rays, his glove hand. That's why he couldn't squeeze the glove on Monday
Arkadium Verified Member Posted May 10, 2013 Posted May 10, 2013 That's what happens when you get a jack happy lineup. They don't care about base hits or moving runners. Its all about how can I be a hero. It has looked this way, everyone wants to be a hero... especially guys like Lawrie, Rasmus, Boni, Rajai...
dineke Old-Timey Member Posted May 10, 2013 Posted May 10, 2013 Paul Beeston on Fan590 saying that they'll continue to push forward and not move back. Probably means that they'll sell the rest of the farm at the deadline. lawls
Angrioter Old-Timey Member Posted May 10, 2013 Posted May 10, 2013 Paul Beeston on Fan590 saying that they'll continue to push forward and not move back. Probably means that they'll sell the rest of the farm at the deadline. lawls Sean Nolin + Christina Lopes for Kevin "CY" Slowey Aaron Sanchez + Anthony Gose for Utley
Metallijay Verified Member Posted May 10, 2013 Posted May 10, 2013 Jays 29th w/ RISP.... CHEERS! That's .204 AVG, only behind the Cubbies. THIS, so much this is the single most frustrating aspect of this team, you cannot win if you keep failing to bring runners on base home, it's been a major issue and frustrating to watch other teams be way better at it by simply being smart and changing this approach based on situation.
Angrioter Old-Timey Member Posted May 10, 2013 Posted May 10, 2013 Stroman + Smoral for Bud Norris + Marwin Gonzalez Stroman + Smoral was drafted last june, they can't be traded until after june 2013 Lawrie + McGuire for Bud Norris + Marwin Gonzalez DeRosa every day 3B
Angrioter Old-Timey Member Posted May 10, 2013 Posted May 10, 2013 Right, they'll be traded at the deadline. Don't forget we'd also need to get WBC hero Pete Orr in any deal with the Phillies. Slowey is my man Aaron Sanchez for Slowey is a great deal
Angrioter Old-Timey Member Posted May 10, 2013 Posted May 10, 2013 What hard-throwing righty reliever with no control do you think AA will trade for? My money's on Rhiner Cruz. +1 Rhiner Cruz three-digit fastball and nothing more..He fits in the AA model.
Angrioter Old-Timey Member Posted May 10, 2013 Posted May 10, 2013 What hard-throwing righty reliever with no control do you think AA will trade for? My money's on Rhiner Cruz. what about hard-throwing RP + Canadian? Aumont + Utley for Sanchez, Nolin, Stroman, Gose and Aj Jimenez
Angrioter Old-Timey Member Posted May 10, 2013 Posted May 10, 2013 Throw Pete Orr and Tyson Gillies in there too and give the Phillies Bonifacio. Aumont, Orr, Lawrie, Gillies would probably be the largest collection of Canadians ever assembled, the marketing department (which runs the team) would have a field day. So many dominicans in the same team, Jays need more Canadians. Morneau + Doumit for EE + Boni
Stangstag Old-Timey Member Posted May 10, 2013 Posted May 10, 2013 Throw Pete Orr and Tyson Gillies in there too and give the Phillies Bonifacio. Aumont, Orr, Lawrie, Gillies would probably be the largest collection of Canadians ever assembled, the marketing department (which runs the team) would have a field day. I know that you guys are just joking around, but a trade like this probably has a good chance of actually happening. It is actually sad how far AA has fallen.
JohnnyLonghorn Verified Member Posted May 10, 2013 Posted May 10, 2013 With the Rays only needing a single hit to win the game, I bring in the best option I have period. You play to win games not for meaningless stats. I agree 100%
GD Old-Timey Member Posted May 10, 2013 Posted May 10, 2013 Stroman + Smoral was drafted last june, they can't be traded until after june 2013 Lawrie + McGuire for Bud Norris + Marwin Gonzalez DeRosa every day 3B Just to be a nitpicking ass, they can be named as PTBNL.
eastcoastjaysfan Old-Timey Member Posted May 10, 2013 Posted May 10, 2013 Kinda like the game where the Jays were down by a run to the Yankees a few years ago and sent Johnny f***ing McDonald to the plate in the 9th with two outs, expecting some offensive contribution on a non-Fathers Day game and leaving Randy Ruiz on the bench. Why, because if the Jays had've tied the game and gone to extras they may have had a weird defensive alignment. OMG, we can't have that happen. I remember that game VIVIDLY and I was SO ANGRY when Mac wasn't pinch hit for. I remember most of the board actually being ok with the non-PH there though.
Arkadium Verified Member Posted May 10, 2013 Posted May 10, 2013 Why is Rajai Davis in that list? Because Rajai is not a team player, he just goes up their hacking... and swinging for the fences when his job is to get the f*** OB.
Arkadium Verified Member Posted May 10, 2013 Posted May 10, 2013 Rajai picked up two hits yesterday and manufactured a run all by himself. He's one of the most useful bench players in baseball. I love him, he's great at what he does. That's nice, I hate him. For every 1 great thing he does, he does 9 things to f*** you.
JoJo Parker Dunedin Blue Jays - A SS On Tuesday, Parker was just 1-for-5, but the one hit was his first professional home run. Explore JoJo Parker News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now