The Cats Ass Old-Timey Member Posted January 12, 2014 Posted January 12, 2014 Urias is rated 89th after his first season by Mayo, I think he'll climb higher than Sanchez eventually, he'll be rated in all the Major Top 100 lists in February. Should be good
KingKat Old-Timey Member Posted January 12, 2014 Posted January 12, 2014 Good thing Sanchez isn't a lefty.
The Cats Ass Old-Timey Member Posted January 12, 2014 Posted January 12, 2014 Good thing Sanchez isn't a lefty. Being the best in a crappy group of things isn't always great. I'd actually go with Hultzen though.
The Cats Ass Old-Timey Member Posted January 12, 2014 Posted January 12, 2014 Is the number of NA spots open for vote this off season? We had 1 last year. I see the other dynasty league is going with 2.
z3r0s Old-Timey Member Posted January 12, 2014 Posted January 12, 2014 Being the best in a crappy group of things isn't always great. I'd actually go with Hultzen though. As Hultzen's owner I'd love to agree... the injury concerns are real tho and hurt any ranking of him.
Dr. Dinger Old-Timey Member Posted January 12, 2014 Posted January 12, 2014 As Hultzen's owner I'd love to agree... the injury concerns are real tho and hurt any ranking of him. If I had to bet, I'd say Hultzen's career is pretty much shot. There isn't much in the way of lefty prospects at the moment, I'd probably give the nod to Heaney.
z3r0s Old-Timey Member Posted January 12, 2014 Posted January 12, 2014 If I had to bet, I'd say Hultzen's career is pretty much shot. Why do you say hurtful things
Dr. Dinger Old-Timey Member Posted January 12, 2014 Posted January 12, 2014 Because shoulder injuries are just about the worst thing that can happen to a pitcher. As a former Tommy Hanson and Michael Pineda owner, I feel pretty qualified to speak on the matter. Also, I f***ed up my rotator cuff so I know how s***** it can be.
Dr. Dinger Old-Timey Member Posted January 12, 2014 Posted January 12, 2014 Guy spent three years in the wilderness with shoulder trouble (and 30 days w/ it this year, perhaps a concern). Perhaps not, considering what I gave up for him. For every Anibal, there are a dozen Dustin McGowans.
The Cats Ass Old-Timey Member Posted January 12, 2014 Posted January 12, 2014 So about this voting thing....
Dr. Dinger Old-Timey Member Posted January 12, 2014 Posted January 12, 2014 If you want to table this for voting, post a thread on the ProBoard. You might want to run in by the Darrells first in case they have any strong opinions on the matter.
The Cats Ass Old-Timey Member Posted January 12, 2014 Posted January 12, 2014 If you want to table this for voting, post a thread on the ProBoard. You might want to run in by the Darrells first in case they have any strong opinions on the matter. Aren't you one of the Darrell's?
Dr. Dinger Old-Timey Member Posted January 12, 2014 Posted January 12, 2014 Yeah but I don't speak for all of us.
The Cats Ass Old-Timey Member Posted January 12, 2014 Posted January 12, 2014 Yeah but I don't speak for all of us. I see. Wanna talk among your kind then and find out how they feel about it?
KingKat Old-Timey Member Posted January 12, 2014 Posted January 12, 2014 Agreed, who's KK? I think he was reffering to me.
havok24 Old-Timey Member Posted January 12, 2014 Posted January 12, 2014 I think he was reffering to me. Sent you a PM.
Laika Community Moderator Posted January 12, 2014 Author Posted January 12, 2014 I would probably vote in favor of a 2nd NA slot, but I don't really care. An extra NA slot only really helps teams stash players for a short period of time. You can stash a prospect there through the summer draft cut-down date, but as soon as February rolls around you need to trim your big league squad down to 20 anyway. As some of us have been finding out, oftentimes the prospects that you plop into an NA slot are hard to justify keeping in your final 20, at least if you have a decent organization. e.g., I just traded Jimmy Nelson for a peanut and I have Jackie Bradley Jr who is basically on the cusp of my top 20 right now. If you call up a prospect too early and he gets sent down for an extended period of time, you still suffer the consequences of the premature call-up when February rolls around. I think the impact of adding the second slot is miniscule, so the question really becomes, what's the point? Change for the sake of change? Does the added roster flexibility even matter?
Laika Community Moderator Posted January 13, 2014 Author Posted January 13, 2014 I can only keep three of these pitchers, and I know at least the top ~5 or so would be definite roster upgrades to a few teams out there. Grant Balfour Matt Harrison Eric Stults Zach McAllister Bud Norris Jesse Crain Joel Peralta Neal Cotts Felipe Paulino Jason Hammel Ordered by approximate cost. Nobody is overly expensive (e.g., a late 3rd rounder would probably be enough for Bud Norris). The bottom five names would be close to free. Help me trim the fat.
TheHurl Site Manager Posted January 13, 2014 Posted January 13, 2014 I would probably vote no on a second NA spot.
z3r0s Old-Timey Member Posted January 13, 2014 Posted January 13, 2014 I would probably vote no for what its worth.
Laika Community Moderator Posted January 13, 2014 Author Posted January 13, 2014 Wait, didn't we already vote on this? IIRC in the summer we had a vote about whether or not to implement an NA slot, and then after that vote passed, we had a vote about whether to implement 1 or 2 slots. If I'm remembering correctly, then this issue can't even be tabled at this point in time.
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted January 13, 2014 Posted January 13, 2014 I believe you're correct. D'oh........ If I remember correctly, we decided on just one. For the best, the NA slot is good for utility especially if you are early promoting a prospect so it gives you a little bit of room for error but 2 is overkill IMO.
NorthOf49 Old-Timey Member Posted January 13, 2014 Posted January 13, 2014 Trade updates..... To: z3r0s Ryan Raburn MiLB pick 55 To: Northof49 MiLB pick 47 Thanks. Also: NJH gets MiLB pick #45 Torontofan gets Kaleb Cowart and Dorssys Paulino Boxy gets Jimmy Nelson and MiLB #18 NJH gets MiLB #16 All three of these trades are wins for both teams. Pure roster maneuvering.
Dr. Dinger Old-Timey Member Posted January 13, 2014 Posted January 13, 2014 NJH gets MiLB pick #45 Torontofan gets Kaleb Cowart and Dorssys Paulino Some guys NJH could have drafted instead of Kaleb Cowart: Yasiel Puig Noah Syndergaard Jedd Gyorko Jon Singleton Oswaldo Arcia George Springer Albert Almora Gregory Polanco Nick Franklin Nolan Arenado Kolten Wong Lucas Giolito Robert Stephenson Michael Wacha Yordano Ventura Swing and a miss!
Nox Verified Member Posted January 13, 2014 Posted January 13, 2014 Some guys NJH could have drafted instead of Kaleb Cowart: Yasiel Puig Noah Syndergaard Jedd Gyorko Jon Singleton Oswaldo Arcia George Springer Albert Almora Gregory Polanco Nick Franklin Nolan Arenado Kolten Wong Lucas Giolito Robert Stephenson Michael Wacha Yordano Ventura Swing and a miss! Another move like that and his Darrell membership is going to subject to review.
Laika Community Moderator Posted January 13, 2014 Author Posted January 13, 2014 Apparently I'm not a very good BR scout. Definitely whiffed on 4 of my 6 initial MiLB draft picks. At least Stroman in the last round kind of made up for some of the failure, and I think my farm is probably middle of the pack at least after our second draft.
Abomination Old-Timey Member Posted January 13, 2014 Posted January 13, 2014 3-way Cat's Ass receives: Cliff Lee King Kat receives: Julio Urias and MiLB pick #4 Spanky receives: Aaron Sanchez I see a joke forming involving a pair of pussies and a Dirty (filthy stuff) Sanchez... Interesting trade though
Dr. Dinger Old-Timey Member Posted January 13, 2014 Posted January 13, 2014 http://cdn.baseballamerica.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/julio-urias-2013-mug-bm.jpg Apparently you only need one good eye to pitch like a boss.
Dr. Dinger Old-Timey Member Posted January 14, 2014 Posted January 14, 2014 I think he checked in here about a week ago.
JoJo Parker Dunedin Blue Jays - A SS On Tuesday, Parker was just 1-for-5, but the one hit was his first professional home run. Explore JoJo Parker News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now