Yes. Because roden would also make 800k and is projected to be a just above 2 WAR player. That's worth about 140m over his control.
We COULD just get a rental reliever that is at least 90% of varland and do that repeatedly every offseason and every deadline and never get close to 140m over 7 years. That's not counting rojas.
Deadline prices for relievers are high (for their war output) because its SO important when you are good. But its not important to lock that down years in advance because firstly they are variable by nature and secondly you don't want to pay deadline prices pro rated over 5 years of control for a reliever.
its a bad deal in the way starters and position players generally aren't.
IF they have a plan to move him back to start next year, i like this.
Its great to have control of position players and starting pitchers.
Relievers are so enigmatic, that control of anyone who isn't elite is not worth much.
The only way this works is if he goes back to starting.
This fetish about reliever control... why would i give a f***?
they are cheap every single year, year after year after year at the deadline. Just sitting there to be gotten for nothing prospects.
But no, we got 5 years of control! Awesome.
Why would i care about 5.5 years of control of a reliever? its so dumb.
This year is our shot and we prioritized 5 years of control of a god damn reliever.
the yankees made trades to win the division THIS year. Our front office is fine but it is easily the worst in this division .
You aren't supposed to win deadline deals. If you do something is wrong honestly. You are generally trading years of control for rentals.
He finds good players with future value and then trades them and then repeats over and over again.
Us flipping austin martin is fine, but i'd prefer if we just didn't miss on the pick instead.
I love Preller. I'm convinced that he is just uber confident that he can replenish, And he has been mostly right.
He's so off the ghoul like behavior of most of the league that i love it.