What do you think you were "right" about? Simply that the FO would DFA Jimenez over optioning Lukes?
You want a gold star for guessing correctly on something with a 50/50 outcome?
If you're suggesting this was an obvious move and there's no way they'd consider optioning Lukes - I don't think this result confirms or denies that at all.
MI depth is a real thing - especially for a team that will be contending in a VERY difficult AL East. I fully expect the FO looked at this in depth before making any decision. How'd Leo look this spring, how'd Kasevich look, play and fit in - is he finally healthy? What other MI's might be on the waiver wire this year? How'd Schneider look defensively at 2nd?
This move comes with risk and god knows you'll be the first in line to sh*t on the FO if Gimenez breaks his leg and Kasevich's back becomes an issue again - or Schneider is back to hitting .192.
The margin for error this year is razer thin. We have OF depth at the ML level and the upper minors. As harsh as it is, nobody should give a f*ck about Lukes' feelings (and Ioved the Lukes story last year). He's a 31 year old journeyman who's had 500 effective PA's in his career and is more likely to turn back into a pumpkin this year than he is to contribute.
Nobody is "right" or "wrong" - it's just whether this decision comes back to bite us in the *ss or not.