Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

glory

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    14,711

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by glory

  1. glory
    Agreed. MLB made like $11b last season. A system like the NBA where there is an even revenue split and a salary floor/cap would actually help the vast majority of players in MLB and only hurt the top 1%. Not sure why that’s such a non starter for the MLBPA. A free market is great for the elite but hurts practically everyone else depending on how owners are feeling in a particular off season. I get they want the Ohtani’s of the world to maximize their value without restrictions but owners are using the current CBT as a cap anyway so it’s not helping the majority of the players they represent.
  2. glory
    Schneider had 8 bad games after hitting like Barry Bonds for 1.5 months, and the Jays couldn't wait to bench him for Biggio. I wouldn't be too confident that DS will start everyday at 2B. It's possible, and he should given the projections, but I'm going to wait and see what they do. No scenario would really surprise me.
  3. glory
    I’m not a huge fan of Horowitz but I think him making the team in that “start against righties a couple days a week + pinch hit for IKF” role would be better received. The only way this winter makes any sense is if the Jays plan to use their young players in critical spots. If it’s just going to be a revolving door of 0-1 WAR vetrins hoping one of them sticks, then it’s not going to be a fun experience. I don’t think anyone is knocking signing vets to minor league deals. It’s the fact that the Jays are likely going to use those vets at some point that is the aggravating part (see Panik). Yes, Vogelbach does hit well against RHP but he’s also a DH who makes the fatties already on the roster look like they have eight packs by comparison. There is very little upside or versatility there.
  4. glory
    Vogelbach and Escobar probably have a far better chance of making this roster than Dexter Fowler did. Joe Panik was also a harmless minor league signing in 2021, except when he made the team and suddenly it wasn’t so good anymore. I don’t mind vetrin minor league signings. Every team does it, but the fear of one or both of Vogelbach/Escobar making it is real. I hope I’m wrong and both are discarded prior to opening day but assuming these are signings to just fill Buffalo’s roster is probably going to lead to disappointment.
  5. glory
    If all our fatties suddenly come to camp in shape, then that’s certainly a good start.
  6. glory
    That’s why I said as long as he’s in the org. I hope he opts out.
  7. glory
    You know damn well the Jays are going to use Escobar at some point as long as hes in the org so I’m actually rooting for a full season of IKF at 3B at this point (if they can’t bring Chapman back on a pillow contract).
  8. glory
    I would think the QO would make Chapman on a pillow contract unattractive to everyone other than the Jays but it depends on the team in question. The Jays were a CBT team last season so their penalties for signing a qualified FA are higher than a non-tax team (which I'm guessing the Cubs and Giants were last year though I haven't looked it up). My guess is if he signs elsewhere it will be a long(er) term deal. If he's looking for a 1 year deal (with a player option for 2025) to enter the market again next season without the QO, then the Jays are probably the most likely to take him up on that.
  9. glory
    Either sign Chapman to a 1+1 deal (that’s the type of pillow contracts Boras likes) or just sign some lefty mashing 4th OF like Grossman and take your chances with what you have. Bellinger, unless he’s also taking a pillow contract (doubtful) is just too risky.
  10. glory
    Probably prior to the 2007 season given the timeline. I vaguely remember a Wells/Kemp rumor but not sure if it was before or after Wells signed the extension. If I recall it was Paul Godfrey who wanted Wells extended, as it was before Beeston came back into the fold.
  11. glory
    Lopez had a 65 wRC+ in AAA (346 PA) last season and is out of options. I mean, being more valuable than IKF isn't a high bar, so I guess it's possible if he figures something out, but I don't think it would have been wise for the Jays to bank on that in 2024. The Jays should have stuck with their internal options over signing IKF, though. That I would agree with. Biggio, Espinal, and Clement on the big league side, and then a bunch of prospect depth in the minors. Oh well, just have to hope he has a couple of good seasons in him. Atkins has had a pretty good run with FA signings over the past few years (Ray, Springer, Semien, Phelps, Garcia, Gausman, Kikuchi, KK, Bassitt, Belt, Green). IKF does feel a lot closer to Roark/Morales than those ones, though.
  12. glory
    $7.5m AAV and two guaranteed years for IKF is gross, and even more in hindsight knowing that the price for Chapman might drop. This might end up being a Morales/Encarnacion redux where Atkins quickly signed a replacement only to see the departing FA sign for a lot less than anticipated. Either way, I don't think Atkins wants a deal that surpasses two years (otherwise I suspect Soler would have been signed), so unless Chapman is willing to sign a 1+1 deal, I don't think Atkins will be that interested. I actually think preserving 2024-25 financial flexibility is the smart move. It won't help 2024, but if you're going to spend, then spend on impact talent, not the best of a mediocre FA class. Go after Soto (unlikely) or Bregman (more likely) next season, or Tucker the year after, plus whatever SP they can sign.
  13. glory
    Yeah I think Espinal, Garcia, and Richards are all easily movable. Yimi is a good RP but there are optionable RPs already on the 40 man with upside (Pearson, Pop, Danner, etc). They should probably trade one of Richards or Garcia anyway, but if you have to trade both to add a 3 WAR 3B on a much shorter deal than expected, then you do it and hope the young pen arms can make up the difference.
  14. glory
    Yeah he wouldn’t cost the team any picks/international money, and fills a massive hole on the roster. Bellinger would cost two picks, $1m in international money, and probably a longer term for a more volatile player. I expect the Jays to end up neither one but if I had to guess, I think Chapman is more realistic. He’s not a former MVP coming off a bounce back season so Boras might be less delusional with his contract ask as well.
  15. glory
    If Jimenez is a legit above average defensive SS then I think he's a real prospect. He's already got good plate discipline at a young age and if you mix that with some power potential (combined with the defense) then you might have a decent player there. Whether he can hit enough to start on a good team is the question. With Bichette two years away from free agency, and Jimenez out of options in 2025, he's likely going to factor into their plans in one way or another (either as a big league piece or a trade piece).
  16. glory
  17. glory
    Wow I didn't realize Lopez was that bad in 2023. A 65 wRC+ in AAA where offense was up and no options in 2024. This was inevitable. Hopefully, Rodriguez pans out in whatever role he ends up in. That contract has a lot of surplus value potential if he becomes something.
  18. glory
    Yeah they were starting a broken Alek Manoah over Francis last season. Maybe there were reasons they didn’t want to stretch him out into a SP role in 2023 (injury?) but it was beyond logical to use him as Manoah’s replacement after Alek was demoted the first time. I think they view him as a bulk reliever. My guess is it’s the starting 5 followed by White (due to options he will be on the big league team unless he stinks), Rodriguez, Tiedemann, and Francis (1-2 times through the order) in that order. If Parsons is starting games in May then the entire rotation would have gotten hurt, and at that point it wouldn’t even matter. I think having an entire pen with no optionable relievers is tough. Would make sense to trade Garcia or Richards just to free up a spot for someone like Pearson, Danner, Pop, or whoever, especially if the team can actually get something useful in return.
  19. glory
    Not necessarily Soto, but impact free agents in general. Between KK, Turner, Jansen, Kikuchi, Garcia, and Richards, the Jays will have ~$47m coming off the books after this season, and then between guaranteed 2025 salaries and expected arbitration increases, probably around $100m coming off the books after 2025 between Vlad, Bo, IKF, Biggio, Bassitt, Romano, Green, Swanson, and Mayza. They can go after the Soto's, Tucker's, Burnes', etc, over the next two off seasons. Of course the only way for that plan to work effectively is to have some inexpensive 2-4 WAR players starting elsewhere, so prospect development over the next two seasons will be huge, especially this season.
  20. glory
    From an entertainment standpoint I thought 2022 was fine aside from the 3000 plate appearances that Raimel Tapia was given. Yes some pitchers struggled but that happens year to year. The 2023 team was torture to watch from beginning to end.
  21. glory
    Bauer made enemies in MLB (Manfred specifically) well before the scandal happened. I’m guessing that’s at least partly a factor here.
  22. glory
    The 2021 and 2022 teams were not "borderline WC teams". The 2021 team had a 99 win expected W/L and finished 4th in their own division with 91 wins. The 2022 team had the 3rd best record in the AL and were 2nd in the AL in runs (4th in MLB). The 2023 was the closest thing to a borderline WC team during this run, and they finished with 1 fewer win than the eventual World Series champions. Don't get me wrong, the 2023 team were a huge long shot to advance in the playoffs given how the offense looked, but the 2021-22 teams were legitimately good. Sometimes the playoffs are what they are.
  23. glory
    Yeah the plan made sense (go for elite talent and if that fails go for short term vets), but the execution was poor. KK is redundant with Varsho (and coming off a season he will likely not repeat), IKF's bat isn't good enough to be a starter, and Turner is 100 years old so a 'fall of a cliff' could happen at any moment. There had to be a better way to implement this strategy. The only real hope is for a prospect or two to come up mid season (or out of ST) and surprise. Not sure I'd want to bet on that, but that might be more reasonable than hoping for KK, IKF, and Turner to be difference makers.
  24. glory
    Only way this off season makes sense is if Atkins is planning to do what the Orioles did last season and just call up a bunch of prospects mid season once they start performing in AAA, and the vetrins brought in are just to maintain/raise the floor. Otherwise, yeah, this has been a very underwhelming winter.
  25. glory
    Sounds like the Jays will view Schneider in the same way they viewed Merrifield, as a 2B and defacto 4th OF. Which means against lefties we probably see the Murderers Row lineup of Schneider in LF, Espinal at 2B, and IKF at 3B. I really hope Turner can play some 3B, even if it's a modest amount.
×
×
  • Create New...