100%. And unlike posters on a message board the FO and ownership invest millions in that analysis. They hand pick the people who gather than information to make recommendations. They make decisions based on this vis a vis investments. Just like any business would. The reality is not every leader would make the same investment based on the analysis and who did the analysis. They are paid to make these bets and they live or die by them.
At the end of the day the FO is responsible for the results of the business. Is it always fair? No. Ross fired Charlie? Was that totally fair? Probably not.
I agree playoff performance is not the best or only metric for evaluating the FO and their performance. But it is one metric of value and that success does tend to have a disproportionate positive impact on the business performance, for obvious reasons (unless you are the Rays fanbase).
I don't buy the young team or bad luck rationale for convenient "everything is awesome" analysis of this FO performance. OTOH I'm not in the hang 'em high camp for Atkins either. 2023 is a big year. I think other teams like HOU and ATL are doing a much better job of building a sustainable winner than Ross is at this point. He has traded a lot of our top prospects (at the time) and he has spent a boat load of signing money on deals for Kooch, Roark, Grichuk, Aging brittle Springer, Ryu who knows, Berrios ??. Some have worked out better than others. I think thats normal, but it its a informing metric for judging his performance. Vlad was gifted from AA and Gausman and Manoah have been gems so far for this FO. Lets seen what happens.