That's not particularly argumentative. There's obviously a lot of noise in individual WAR but the fact that it largely seem to average out and correspond to actual wins is a good sign. Means that for the most part it's going in the right direction even if it's always going to be a work in progress. I think most people who use WAR understand its limitations. If you look at the MVP debate this year, I haven't seen too many people argue tooth and nail that it should be Trout over Donaldson because of WAR. It seems like most people agree that the difference between the two could easily be attributed to noise and shouldn't be considered significant.