Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

John_Havok

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    20,897
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    17

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by John_Havok

  1. Wasn't very subtle about hinting...he pretty much said it without directly saying it
  2. Yep. Cooke could be a guy that fills a need of swing and miss, Danner if he's healthy will certainly get another shot. Any of the LHRs in the upper minors could get a look. Troy Watson is a guy who could get there too. On the older side but he doesn't have to be 21 to be an effective reliever. Complete nothing burger from his draft all the way through 2021...k rate of like 4.5. then in 2022 obviously something was adjusted as his K rate spiked as high as 14.1
  3. I know thats pretty standard in a lot of forums but ... our comments are pretty well moderated for the most part. Casual bickering will always happen and can be cleaned up. It's really the spam threads that get tedious to deal with
  4. Would it be possible to moderate new accounts for putting up threads rather than posts? Like, a bot signs up to make a new thread, they have to be approve before a thread can be started, but if it's a new account signing up and it's just a comment... that's okay? Seems to me the vast majority of first posts are people and first threads are bots.
  5. There might be a universe out there that exists where he does, but I don't think it's this one. Early ST setback (not serious) plus a very obvious innings cap from last year to this one...it's doubtful. Unless the Jays want to specifically use him as a 3 inning opener rather than carry a true 5th starter. I'm guessing that's not what they are planning and they'd rather have tiedemann getting the bulk of his innings towards the end of the season if he's up with the club Injury caveats to other pitchers nothwithstanding of course
  6. Would cause far more problems than it would hope to solve
  7. That was already reduced a few years ago to maximum 5 times per season.
  8. Yes even more of a thing with an elite CF in place.
  9. I think it makes sense completely why you wouldn’t save as many runs or have as quite a high OAA in LF or Rf. The biggest factor would be that you’re deferring to the CF on balls hit where both of you might make the catch, most of the time. That could make a big difference over the course of a season.
  10. Will never get a cut back of roster players with a players union around. There also the issue that guys being optioned up and down is now capped at 5 times per year, so trimming the amount of pitchers on a roster would be greatly impacted by that cap
  11. Especially in a game where the wind is swirling in all kinds of crazy ways and the Rays 3b nearly muffed a simple pop up the inning before. In The RC he makes that play 99/100 without even needing to dive. It’s Florida in spring, the wind is nuttier than baseball players pics in the new pants.
  12. Pfft. Manfred is destroying baseball again! Scherzer has a completely weird take on it though…they aren’t “too scared to let pitchers fail” like they’re trying to protect the pitchers ego or something, they’re doing it because they don’t want to give up any more runs… which happens a lot more often the third time through the order for almost every pitcher in baseball except the very best. It’s always been that way. Now teams just realize it’s better to take a guy out sooner rather than later when it comes to winning games. The quote from Dave Roberts sums it up perfectly… “From a fan perspective, yeah, to see a guy in there to go seven, eight innings, I absolutely get it. Doesn’t necessarily help you win baseball games, and I’m in the business of winning games."
  13. mechanics are still very clearly out of whack. THe command was nowhere near this bad even in his "results beating peripherals" year 1st start of spring so not ready to throw out Baby Huey with the bathwater but... as a continuation of last season its certainly worrisome. I'm just surprised all the weight loss didn't instantly fix all of his problems.
  14. This might be the single greatest 1st post in board history.
  15. Wait until we get into how long a steak needs to be cooked to be edible.
  16. A physically underdeveloped high schooler... who is now 6'6" 216 at 20 years old. That's a timely growth spurt
  17. You don’t need to “learn” Celsius. It’s not you’re required to do calculations to figure out the temperature…. It’s no harder than changing your clock in the spring. You just change the numbers you look at and accept the new reality
  18. Yeah, I think he’s looking at the same framework as Bellinger got, just with lower AAV. Me and Spanky hashed that out either in this thread or a different one yesterday.
  19. And yes, I’m jealous because I’m not in Florida at ST and instead am sitting in a -25 freezing hellhole of Saskatchewan. Definitely a SS in his day…look at that form!
  20. What people infer from a statement is just that…an inference. I concede the possibility exists that Atkins had and continues to have no intention of bringing back Chapman, because I’m not in his head. But either way he can’t state he’s not interested in any specific player since it’s against the CBA to do so.
  21. Oh that one, yeah that was Oct 7th. He said initially “The bulk of our team [is] essentially returning,” Atkins said. “We’ll miss Matt Chapman and Brandon Belt and Kevin Kiermaier. We’ll see opportunities to work to fill those holes from within and externally. The bulk of our pitching returning, minus Hyun-Jin Ryu. Maybe a couple of others, Alek Manoah coming back into the fold, thought Hyun-Jin Ryu could also be an alternative for us.” Then he said a few minutes later he was open to bringing back all three guys, one of which happened. Then Nov 7th - Atkins says “absolutely remain interested” on a multi-year deal for Chapman. Atkins has had dialogue with both Chapman and his agent, Scott Boras, and said, “our engagement has been great.” For context, the Atkins quote was after they had extended the qualifying offer but before the deadline to accept or reflect so the rejection that was clearly a formality had not happened yet. Chapman hasn’t made any comments post season as you’d expect but before the end of the season, Chapman said he was “definitely open to coming back” and praised the organization for how they take care of players. “They really care about (the) players, and there’s nothing that they wouldn’t do for you. So I have a lot of respect for everybody in this organization,” Chapman said. That last bit was from a story in the Athletic on Nov 8th
  22. Nice! For a vid on a pasty bald white dude in a sleeveless shirt and fashionably questionable shorts catching a Westburg HR ball, click here! Please note the very excellent and fundamentally sound fielding position displayed at the 12 second mark of the video https://www.mlb.com/gameday/orioles-vs-braves/2024/02/26/748228/final/wrap
  23. Which comments are you referring to and from when?
  24. From recent stuff out there from a wide variety of sources, nobody can even confirm a team having even made offers on Chapman, Montgomery or Snell since the season ended. They called Boras, got the asking price, probably laughed, hung up and just never called back.
×
×
  • Create New...