Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Laika

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    38,314
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    85

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Laika

  1. I didn't want to make it seem absolute. Maybe my word choice wasn't great. BUT, on a balance of probabilities, I would be forced to say that he was probably safe and in fact he never lost contact with the bag.
  2. His foot doesn't slide back to the bag at all - it just slides along the far side of the bag. It's an illusion caused by the angle. This is obvious from 0:16-0:20 in your link. If his foot ever came off the bag and had to slide back to it, it would be obvious from that angle. The viewing angle at 0:16-0:20 is almost parallel to the edge of the bag that Odor supposedly lost contact with, but no gap is visible. It just seems like his foot slides along the edge. Both angles viewed in conjunction make it reasonably clear that he never lost contact.
  3. Yeah, that's the standard of proof for overturning a call. But even if the replay process had a lower standard of proof, I think you could still call him safe.
  4. Here is the video: http://m.mlb.com/video/topic/63817564/v520880083/textor-gm2-odor-slides-back-into-second-safely/?query=Odor Skip to 2:56 for the relevant angle. 2:58 is the image posted above where it looks like his foot is off. Play it from there, 2:58-3:02, and you will see his spike become disengaged from the edge of the bag, causing his foot to slide down. But his spike seems to just slide down the side of the bag without actually falling away from the base entirely, and the sole of his cleat then comes in contact with the base. At 2:58 his spike is the only part of his cleat touching the base, which explains the visual gap between hit show and the base, because the spike adds depth. But he's still in contact with it. The motion of his foot during this slow-motion replay makes it fairly clear that he never lost contact. The way his foot plops down after 2:58 makes it obvious at 2:58 that his spike is actually on the bag, propping up the foot. To say anything else is disingenuous. If a picture says 1000 words, then what's a video worth?
  5. On the video that this picture is taken from it looks like his spike never really left the bag, judging from how the foot moves. They only showed like 2 or 3 angles on the MLB Network broadcast. Had to be a lot more cameras. They didn't show anything from the OF looking in... On another note, Hendriks is arguably the Jays' best reliever and it's pretty crazy and stupid that he was like the 6th RP out of the pen in a game that long. Edwin missing that HR by about 5 feet was gut wrenching. At least the Blue Jays match up very well against Perez and Holland. Holland has a 5.30 FIP this year and he's a lefty. But in the past he was a very good, well above average SP. Perez, left handed as well, is kind of the opposite - he's looked like garbage at certain points in his professional career despite a high prospect pedigree, but this year he's been decent (3.40 FIP). Them being left handed is the key. If you think Toronto has a 65% chance of winning games 3 and 4, respectively, then they have a 42.25% chance of forcing game 5. If you think their chance to win is 60% in each game, then it's 36% for a game 5. I think those percentages to win are reasonable and I think that % chance range of forcing game 5 has to be a bit comforting to some people. Still a real chance!
  6. Not realizing that Hendriks is arguably your team's best RP is kind of egregious. I don't understand why Hawkins was out of the pen before him.
  7. To be fair, the readership of that community post helped increase Carruthers' brand to the point that he got a job in baseball. So it can sort of be a two-way street.
  8. 1B - Belt 2B - Cano 3B - Wright 2B/OF - Zobrist SS - nobody / replacement level player CF - Ellsbury CF - Span (Add, I think) CF - Revere (Add) OF - Ethier OF - Pompey (minors) C - Carlos Ruiz? SP - Arrieta (FA) SP - Stroman (prospect draft) SP - Iglesias (FA) SP - Hammel SP - Bauer SP - Niese SP - Gallardo SP - Peralta RP - Papelbon RP - Cishek RP - O'Day RP - KRod Unlike you guys, my team would be much worse without trading. Trades brought me Votto, Walker, Davis, Dickerson, Santana, Gordon, Fowler, Iwakuma, Salazar, Hendricks, Jimenez, Rondon, and Anderson.
  9. Why did they remove Bautista?
  10. You should have made trades until 2015, but then stopped. I think.
  11. Seems a lot better than your current team
  12. If you list for $99 on stubhub they'll sell in a snap. That's what I'd do.
  13. Those 100 level sections way out in the corners are pretty bad though. Arguably worse viewing than certain spots in the 500 level.
  14. Just saw tickets for $35 USD on stubhub. Decent ones too - row 6 and not way out in the OF 500. Didn't get them in time though. I've seen others pop up and move that were a bit more but still pretty good deals.
  15. I'll give you a package of chicken hot dogs
  16. Updating my tradeblock. Now looking to add Colby Rasmus
  17. Just for everyone's information, "goaltending" means Mike Condon and only Mike Condon. Whoever that is.
  18. Yeah he's ear candy
  19. Nice job reinforcing the patriarchy, you chauvinist pig!
  20. Garbage since he came back + Chris Young destroys lefties. Had to do it.
  21. Colby so #wet he needs a new jersey
  22. yesssss Colby Rasmus yes
×
×
  • Create New...