Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

BTS

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    43,011
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    17

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by BTS

  1. Prime Derek Lowe induced about 2-2.5% more swinging strikes over 200+ inning seasons than Sanchez did as a reliever this year. Derek Lowe was a lot less hittable than Aaron Sanchez looks to be.
  2. Worst case is we end up with another Kyle Drabek. His floor isn't useful reliever.
  3. This front office has a long history of giving playing time to replacement-level talent. I do think he has a chance to be an effective reliever though. It's just really difficult to picture him contributing as a starter next year.
  4. 0 would be most likely
  5. Yeah I know. For some reason I was thinking he was like a 7/4 K/BB GB guy.
  6. This would be shocking.
  7. Nobody wants Clay Buckles or Tim Hudson?
  8. And now that I look at the numbers, Carlos Silva is not what I thought he was. Egregious comp, I'm dumn etc...
  9. He'll need command. Nobody wants to run Carlos Silva out there.
  10. Not nearly enough information.
  11. I had actually assumed like 11% because he sure looked dominant.
  12. Yeah, that's my take too. The comp pick will come very close to being as valuable as I expect Sanchez to be a year from now. Add in like $20-30 million in surplus value from Zobrist and it's a very light offer.
  13. Holy f***, Sanchez only had a swinging strike rate of 6.2% out of the pen this year.
  14. Sanchez for one year of Zobrist (+ comp pick) seems very light. Pretty sure it doesn't get a deal done.
  15. No, but I wouldn't be surprised if he was in the 1.5 range, which would make him a 5/1 K/B guy.
  16. xFIP is really just K, BB, and GB rate. His xFIP was lower because he stopped walking people.
  17. You could always put yourself on the DDL waiting list and hope one of us doesn't have children.
  18. I hope their young guys work out and their FO makes good enough decisions to support them with good vets. Their core could be a lot of fun to watch going forward.
  19. I like that the Twins stepped up to keep their guy here. They've been through a rough stretch, and just stumbled on a guy good enough to set the single-season K/BB record. Good for them for absorbing a palatable amount of risk to make sure their guy isn't being poached for at least five years. They're trying to build a quality product, and the optics of losing an ace (if indeed he is one) would be disastrous.
  20. But having him under contract for three reasonably priced years beats beats having him walk for a comp pick. I like the idea of extending a player 1-2 years before free agency if you can find terms that work, and I think these terms work. We live in a world where Feldmans and Guthries and Vargases land 20-30 M guarantees. I think a healthy Hughes is a very solid bet to be significantly better than that.
  21. I don't see this deal as particularly risky. 3 years @ 14 per is unlikely to carry significant negative value, and with a repeat of 2014 they were looking at something like 5/100 instead of 3/42.
  22. This is probably a good move. Having under contract for 5 years @ $58 M for his age-29-33 seasons is solid.
  23. Sent you a PM.
  24. You should get on with the rebuild. I could use Perry or Lucic.
×
×
  • Create New...