Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 8.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Yeah, I would like an upgrade on the SP, but I'm not worried about the depth. We're fine. Sign Conforto.

 

Conforto seems like much better value than the old washed up guys being proposed. That or we pony up more and get Eovaldi.

Community Moderator
Posted
Conforto seems like much better value than the old washed up guys being proposed. That or we pony up more and get Eovaldi.

 

Yeah Eovaldi would be a clear upgrade.

Possibly big enough that you could even consider Berrios the #5...

 

If Toronto is going to just forget about being under the luxury tax then he would be great

 

I also wonder if he might want an opt out after 1 season. So it might not be a long term commitment. I dunno.

Posted
Conforto seems like much better value than the old washed up guys being proposed. That or we pony up more and get Eovaldi.

 

Or both, as Laika just said. :)

 

I don't believe they are very worried about the CBT.

Posted
Yeah Eovaldi would be a clear upgrade.

Possibly big enough that you could even consider Berrios the #5...

 

If Toronto is going to just forget about being under the luxury tax then he would be great

 

I also wonder if he might want an opt out after 1 season. So it might not be a long term commitment. I dunno.

 

I'd sign Eovaldi if he'd take a 1 year deal. That would leave the next group of 6-8 guys as depth. It's nice to have a plan in place incase one of our top 4 miss some time.

Posted
Yeah Eovaldi would be a clear upgrade.

Possibly big enough that you could even consider Berrios the #5...

 

If Toronto is going to just forget about being under the luxury tax then he would be great

 

I also wonder if he might want an opt out after 1 season. So it might not be a long term commitment. I dunno.

 

Eovaldi would definitely be a clear upgrade and as Jonn mentioned in the Postseason he has experience as a dominant multi-inning reliever which is intriguing. Whereas Cueto or Kluber really would have no use on the Postseason roster unless there is an injury or two to one of the guys ahead of him.

 

You can never have enough pitching, though if Eovaldi is going to cost just a couple million more than Kluber/Cueto, better just to spend the extra money on getting him.

Posted
Laika- I think the best thing for SP depth in 2023 would be another nearly MLB ready SP prospect. Like one of those Arizona arms as part of a catcher trade, to slide in along Tiedemann as an upside play.

 

Yes, so much from AZ that would give me a boner.

 

Regardless, where from, we need more depth for the rotation.

Posted
Yes, so much from AZ that would give me a boner.

 

Regardless, where from, we need more depth for the rotation.

 

The reality is that Arizona is a team on the upswing who could be good soon - and for a long time.

Posted
Yeah, the point is not that the team does not need an upgrade on SP5. Everybody would love a clear upgrade on SP5.

 

The point is that most of the names people want to bring in are not even projected upgrades.

 

If you look at ZiPS:

 

Kikuchi, 110.3 IP, 4.49 ERA, 1.0 WAR

White, 96.3 IP, 4.48 ERA, 1.0 WAR

Pearson 65.3 IP, 4.41 ERA, 0.7 WAR

Ryu, 3.93 ERA

Tiedemann, 4.12 ERA

Juenger, 4.25 ERA

Zulueta, 5.05 ERA

 

This is not like 2022 where the team went into the year with a big injury risk in the middle of the rotation (Ryu) and a big injury risk in the SP7 slot (Pearson) a performance risk in the SP5 slot (Kikuchi) and big performance risk in the SP6 slot (Stripling).

 

This year you would not characterize anybody in the SP1-SP4 slots as performance or injury risks (you assume negative regression from Manoah and some positive from Berrios but mostly just accept that Berrios is an SP4 now). The ostensible durability of the top 4 makes it a bit easier to be comfortable with everyone else filling in that final slot.

 

The depth chart + projections seem to say that Kikuchi and White should be "fine" and there is plenty of upside on the way in the second half with Ryu, Tiedemann, and Zulu. Also wild cards in Pearson and Juenger. White and Kikuchi also have some upside on their own.

 

And look at the projected performances of the possible free agents:

 

Kluber, 1.7 WAR, 4.45 ERA in 156 innings

Wacha, 1.5 WAR, 4.43 ERA in 153 innings

Miley, 1.1 WAR, 4.38 ERA

Greinke, 1.0 WAR, 4.55 ERA

Cueto, 0.8 WAR, 4.68 ERA

these are not park adjusted ERAs for Rogers Centre

 

Is it really worth $11M or so to bring in Kluber? For a minimal projected upgrade? I would take him of course, but it seems inefficient. And guys like Greinke and Cueto just seem like lateral moves with zero upside at all.

 

I think the best thing for SP depth in 2023 would be another nearly MLB ready SP prospect. Like one of those Arizona arms as part of a catcher trade, to slide in along Tiedemann as an upside play.

 

I just don't see the point in some boring old SP5 for this rotation. And I'm sure the Blue Jays FO looks at a lot of those potential additions and thinks something similar - "but this guy isn't even a projected upgrade on Kikuchi or White..."

 

Sure, but all those who think projections are useless basically take the default position of " player X (in this case Kikuchi) sucked last year so he will surely suck this year, and player Y(say Miley) who was better than player X last year, must therefore also be better than player X this year"

Community Moderator
Posted
Sure, but all those who think projections are useless basically take the default position of " player X (in this case Kikuchi) sucked last year so he will surely suck this year, and player Y(say Miley) who was better than player X last year, must therefore also be better than player X this year"

 

I know. It's annoying.

 

But we must continue to fight the good fight.

Posted
Another option where we wouldn't need to worry about over paying FA is trade for Lopez from the Marlins. We would def be in the running for top rotation in baseball.

 

Need a bat first.

Posted
Sure, but all those who think projections are useless basically take the default position of " player X (in this case Kikuchi) sucked last year so he will surely suck this year, and player Y(say Miley) who was better than player X last year, must therefore also be better than player X this year"

 

In the case of Kickuchi. Please explain it to me like I am a 7 year old. I am being serious.

 

What metrics are the projections using to say a pitcher who has declined for the past season and a half is going to improve the following season. I don't see that he was a victim of BAPIP etc, or some other outlier that it is probable would change this year? I mean, he might be friggin Cy Young this year, but how are the projections getting to that conclusion if you consider his actual results the past 1.5 seasons?

Community Moderator
Posted
In the case of Kickuchi. Please explain it to me like I am a 7 year old. I am being serious.

 

What metrics are the projections using to say a pitcher who has declined for the past season and a half is going to improve the following season. I don't see that he was a victim of BAPIP etc, or some other outlier that it is probable would change this year? I mean, he might be friggin Cy Young this year, but how are the projections getting to that conclusion if you consider his actual results the past 1.5 seasons?

 

The projections care more about his more granular statistics. His strikeouts and walks, whiff rates, etc.

 

And the projections are probably still not quite ready to think that his HR rate is not unlucky at all.

 

Here are all the 2022 SP who pitched at least 90 innings and had a K% of 25% or more:

 

Strider, Rodon, Ohtani, Javier, Cole, Snell, Greene, Woodruff, Scherzer, Burnes, Cease, McClanahan, Luzardo, Lodolo, Nola, Gausman, Morton, Kershaw, Verlander, Peterson, Severino, Ray, Kikuchi, Castillo, Gallen, Wheeler, Ashby, Cortes, Springs, Gray, McKenzie, Darvish, Giolito, Mahle, Bieber.

 

If Kikuchi is, truly, a pitcher who can consistently strikeout 25% of batters but give up 2 HR per 9 innings pitched... then he's a statistical unicorn. He's the weirdest pitcher ever. He's unlikely to be the weirdest pitcher ever. Something has to give.

 

Here are the pitchers since 2000 who have done that in a sample of 100 IP or more (25%+ K% and 2 HR/9 or more)

 

2021 Tarik Skubal

2021 Andrew Heaney

 

Skubal was fantastic in 2022 before getting hurt.

Heaney was fantastic in 2022.

 

Not saying Kikuchi will be great or anything but it's pretty easy to see why the projection systems think he is better than his 2022.

Community Moderator
Posted

Kikuchi still only has 466 big league innings. Not a huge sample. And his seasons have been divergent.

 

2019 he had low K rate, but gave up dongs

2020 he did not give up lots of homers and improved the K rate

2021 he had good K rate, okay walk rate, but gave up homers

2022 he had elite K rate, horrible walk rate, and gave up homers

 

All over the place season to season. His FIPs by year are 5.71, 3.30, 4.61, and 5.62 again all over the place.

 

He has not been "consistently" poo he has been bad in two years (2019 and 2022) but palatable in two others, arguably.

Posted
Kikuchi still only has 466 big league innings. Not a huge sample. And his seasons have been divergent.

 

2019 he had low K rate, but gave up dongs

2020 he did not give up lots of homers and improved the K rate

2021 he had good K rate, okay walk rate, but gave up homers

2022 he had elite K rate, horrible walk rate, and gave up homers

 

All over the place season to season. His FIPs by year are 5.71, 3.30, 4.61, and 5.62 again all over the place.

 

He has not been "consistently" poo he has been arguably bad in two years (2019 and 2022) but palatable in two others.

 

Well if he's that inconsistent, all the more reason to add SP depth.

Posted
The projections care more about his more granular statistics. His strikeouts and walks, whiff rates, etc.

 

And the projections are probably still not quite ready to think that his HR rate is not unlucky at all.

 

Here are all the 2022 SP who pitched at least 90 innings and had a K% of 25% or more:

 

Strider, Rodon, Ohtani, Javier, Cole, Snell, Greene, Woodruff, Scherzer, Burnes, Cease, McClanahan, Luzardo, Lodolo, Nola, Gausman, Morton, Kershaw, Verlander, Peterson, Severino, Ray, Kikuchi, Castillo, Gallen, Wheeler, Ashby, Cortes, Springs, Gray, McKenzie, Darvish, Giolito, Mahle, Bieber.

 

If Kikuchi is, truly, a pitcher who can consistently strikeout 25% of batters but give up 2 HR per 9 innings pitched... then he's a statistical unicorn. He's the weirdest pitcher ever. He's unlikely to be the weirdest pitcher ever. Something has to give.

 

Here are the pitchers since 2000 who have done that in a sample of 100 IP or more (25%+ K% and 2 HR/9 or more)

 

2021 Tarik Skubal

2021 Andrew Heaney

 

Skubal was fantastic in 2022 before getting hurt.

Heaney was fantastic in 2022.

 

Not saying Kikuchi will be great or anything but it's pretty easy to see why the projection systems think he is better than his 2022.

 

Thank you for this, I appreciate you taking the time to try and explain it.

 

Ok, so you were focusing on K% which is projected as great in 2023 down to 24.4% from 27% in 2022.

 

If we are using projections, what about BB/9- His 2023 BB/9 is projected at 3.53 by Steamer..

 

Rating BB/9 BB%

Excellent 1.5 4.5%

Great 1.9 5.5%

Above Average 2.5 6.5%

Average 2.9 7.7%

Below Average 3.2 8.0%

Poor 3.5 8.5%

Awful 4.0 9.0%

 

Poor is the second to worst possible BB/9 projection you can get..

 

Guys like Rodon, Above average, Mahle, average etc, so I don't think using just Kikuchi's K% is an apples and apples comp for projecting future success.. I don't know... I have only see regression from him since the All -Star appearance.

 

Thanks again.

Community Moderator
Posted
Thank you for this, I appreciate you taking the time to try and explain it.

 

Ok, so you were focusing on K% which is projected as great in 2023 down to 24.4% from 27% in 2022.

 

If we are using projections, what about BB/9- His 2023 BB/9 is projected at 3.53 by Steamer..

 

Rating BB/9 BB%

Excellent 1.5 4.5%

Great 1.9 5.5%

Above Average 2.5 6.5%

Average 2.9 7.7%

Below Average 3.2 8.0%

Poor 3.5 8.5%

Awful 4.0 9.0%

 

Poor is the second to worst possible BB/9 projection you can get..

 

Guys like Rodon, Above average, Mahle, average etc, so I don't think using just Kikuchi's K% is an apples and apples comp for projecting future success.. I don't know... I have only see regression from him since the All -Star appearance.

 

Thanks again.

 

The K rate is why he projects to be a positive WAR pitcher

The walk rate and HR rates are why he projects to be a below average starting pitcher

 

If he projected to have above average K and BB rates we wouldn't even be having this conversation because he'd be a stud

Posted
Kikuchi still only has 466 big league innings. Not a huge sample. And his seasons have been divergent.

 

2019 he had low K rate, but gave up dongs

2020 he did not give up lots of homers and improved the K rate

2021 he had good K rate, okay walk rate, but gave up homers

2022 he had elite K rate, horrible walk rate, and gave up homers

 

All over the place season to season. His FIPs by year are 5.71, 3.30, 4.61, and 5.62 again all over the place.

 

He has not been "consistently" poo he has been bad in two years (2019 and 2022) but palatable in two others, arguably.

 

He had such a great first half of 2021 that it softened the overall numbers. His 2nd half was s***, which might have been from reduced velocity.., but it was not a good end to the season. So, 1.5 years consecutive of not being good.

Posted
Doesn’t his increased k rate after being moved to the pen artificially inflate his numbers in comparison to your list who at a quick glance were strictly starting pitchers?
Community Moderator
Posted
Doesn’t his increased k rate after being moved to the pen artificially inflate his numbers in comparison to your list who at a quick glance were strictly starting pitchers?

 

Of course, but his K rate at a SP was still 24.5% so it's the same company. There are a few others on the list who relieved a bit.

Community Moderator
Posted

If you want someone recent who might be similar to Kikuchi

 

Vince Velasquez might be the guy.

 

He has had a few seasons where he has been able to miss lots of bats but has gotten shelled (dingers).

 

Anyway, the Kikuchi signing was a nightmare. What an annoying player to have in the fold.

Posted
Of course, but his K rate at a SP was still 24.5% so it's the same company. There are a few others on the list who relieved a bit.

 

Thanks for clarifying

Posted
Kikuchi still only has 466 big league innings. Not a huge sample. And his seasons have been divergent.

 

2019 he had low K rate, but gave up dongs

2020 he did not give up lots of homers and improved the K rate

2021 he had good K rate, okay walk rate, but gave up homers

2022 he had elite K rate, horrible walk rate, and gave up homers

 

All over the place season to season. His FIPs by year are 5.71, 3.30, 4.61, and 5.62 again all over the place.

 

He has not been "consistently" poo he has been bad in two years (2019 and 2022) but palatable in two others, arguably.

 

What do you think of trying him out as a reliever? Seems like he could still thrive there despite a high walk rate. Not sure he has the mental fortitude for high pressure late inning work though.

Posted
What do you think of trying him out as a reliever? Seems like he could still thrive there despite a high walk rate. Not sure he has the mental fortitude for high pressure late inning work though.

 

It's a SSS but he had a 2.28 xFIP as a reliever with 16.2k/9 and a 4.4bb/9. 16IP with 33Ks 9BBs. Had a high .371 BABIP and 80% LOB.

 

I think he may have success as a reliever myself but his arm is so damn interesting you want him to make it as a starter. He had a lot of success in Japan but obviously hasn't found a measure of it in the MLB.

Community Moderator
Posted
What do you think of trying him out as a reliever? Seems like he could still thrive there despite a high walk rate. Not sure he has the mental fortitude for high pressure late inning work though.

 

It could really work.

 

He'd be a bit like Jose Alvarado where the variance would be huge.

 

But he's a mental midget so relief might be better... he has these starts where things just get away from him. In relief the manager could limit the damage better.

 

My plan would be one more chance to start in 2023 - legitimate shot, with 15+ starts. But I would be pulling the plug mid season if he looked as lost as last year and then he'd a be a reliever for the rest of the contract (unless forced back into the rotation).

Posted
So Kikuchi the #5 to start with White as the backup plan. And then by midseason hopefully Zulu and Tiedemann could contribute. Maybe Francis somewhere along the way and perhaps Ryu after the AS break.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...