Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
Don't worry, I reported it so that we can move closer to more inclusive and diverse language.

 

Yeah, it was hilarious. We all laughed at your funny joke.

  • Replies 998
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
I believe it would be proper to say “girls that happen to be particularly fond of band members”

 

I believe it's also considered incorrect to use the term "girls" in this context.

Posted
Its time to get this man back on the mound. And I’m not saying this just because hes on my fantasy team.
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

 

WTF is the holdup on this? This paid admin leave is ********. Either suspend him, or don't.

Posted
I’m not really surprised by this decision. Hopefully this situation will be sorted out in the off-season.
Posted
I’m not really surprised by this decision. Hopefully this situation will be sorted out in the off-season.

 

The players don’t want him back, he’s still getting paid… no reason to fight it really. He’s not going to want to sit all next season though, so something will give. Doubt LAD wants him back.

Posted
The players don’t want him back, he’s still getting paid… no reason to fight it really. He’s not going to want to sit all next season though, so something will give. Doubt LAD wants him back.

 

I will take him. I don’t kink shame like the Dodgers. Hopefully Shatkins doesn’t either.

Posted
I will take him. I don’t kink shame like the Dodgers. Hopefully Shatkins doesn’t either.

 

Jays don’t seem like the Dallas Cowboys kind of team

Posted
I doubt it because he's on paid leave.

 

Yeah you're probably right. So he gets to spend months on admin leave missing games, then might get suspended later for even more, where his salary still gets paid by Dodgers but rather than being paid to him, it goes to wherever suspended player's salary goes.

 

Just feels kinda weird to know that he could be suspended for "insert random #" of games to start next season, when he's already missed 62 so far, and will miss another 21 before the season is over.

Posted
Yeah you're probably right. So he gets to spend months on admin leave missing games, then might get suspended later for even more, where his salary still gets paid by Dodgers but rather than being paid to him, it goes to wherever suspended player's salary goes.

 

Just feels kinda weird to know that he could be suspended for "insert random #" of games to start next season, when he's already missed 62 so far, and will miss another 21 before the season is over.

 

Yeah. I agree it's not ideal, but at the same time he brought all of this on himself. I feel a little sorry for the Dodgers, but not him. MLB should probably withhold MOST of the salary during these investigations, then the rest can be released if appropriate after the investigation concludes.

Posted
Yeah. I agree it's not ideal, but at the same time he brought all of this on himself. I feel a little sorry for the Dodgers, but not him. MLB should probably withhold MOST of the salary during these investigations, then the rest can be released if appropriate after the investigation concludes.

 

Can they do that though? That's a sound suggestion by the way.

Posted
Can they do that though? That's a sound suggestion by the way.

 

They definitely can’t. And you can’t just not pay someone while you take whatever arbitrary time you want to “gather facts”. But I think he was more saying from a moral standpoint, rather than a legal one. Idk. That’s what I got

Posted
They definitely can’t. And you can’t just not pay someone while you take whatever arbitrary time you want to “gather facts”. But I think he was more saying from a moral standpoint, rather than a legal one. Idk. That’s what I got

 

Figured as much. Yeah, a common sense comment.

Posted
Can they do that though? That's a sound suggestion by the way.

 

I imagine they could if it was written into the CBA along with a sensible time limit. There's no way they could as things currently stand. Besides, it makes too much sense for it to ever happen.

Posted
No way in hell the Jays even consider Bauer at league minimum.

 

At league minimum, there are 29 teams that would trip over themselves to bring in Bauer. He only chokes in the bedroom, not on the mound.

Posted
At league minimum, there are 29 teams that would trip over themselves to bring in Bauer. He only chokes in the bedroom, not on the mound.

 

I actually don't think Rogers would allow it even at league min. The front office would be fools not to want it though.

Posted
I actually don't think Rogers would allow it even at league min. The front office would be fools not to want it though.

 

I thought Canadian companies were suppose to be progressive? Kink shaming is not very progressive to me. The consent was there. But when she said skull f*** me. She didn’t mean litterally. We can all learn something from this actually.

 

EDIT: I think all we need would be Canadian sex workers to create a fuss and we would be fine to sign Bauer.

Posted
I thought Canadian companies were suppose to be progressive? Kink shaming is not very progressive to me. The consent was there. But when she said skull f*** me. She didn’t mean litterally. We can all learn something from this actually.

 

EDIT: I think all we need would be Canadian sex workers to create a fuss and we would be fine to sign Bauer.

 

Insert obligatory "your mom" joke here.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...