Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
Cole should be getting the 8th inning too unless we score. He needs the innings too.

 

If I was Montoyo, I’d put Waguespack back out there since he’s absolutely eligible to enter the game

  • Replies 287
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Old-Timey Member
Posted
It tips over to Montoyo looking dumber because he barely pushed back, if at all

 

Gibby would have been all over that s***. God I miss that man.

Posted

Question about the new rules.

 

If a pitcher comes in, faces 1 batter and gets the 3rd out of the 7th inning....and then comes out to face the first batter the 8th inning - can he be taken out after facing the first batter of the 8th inning (because he technically finished an inning) - or must he face at least 2 batters in the 8th inning (3 total)?

 

Thanks in advance.

Posted
I assume nobody on the field knows the exact rule but that's how most umpires would handle the situation. Still seem inexcusable to me to make that pitching change and not see that he's not on your own lineup card in your hand and pinned in your dugout.

 

The only thing a manager is required to give the umpire is the starting lineup and batting order. No potential substitutes need to be listed.

 

I get that just because the majority of us don’t know the rules, that we would decide something based on feelings, but that’s not how sports are played. It’s in the rule book that Waguespack is eligible to enter the game, the ump got it wrong. End of story

 

That doesn’t excuse the lack of attention to detail on Montoyos part as I’m sure these guys truly believe that potential subs should be given, but the fact remains they are not. The second fact that the ump doesn’t know this rule is even more inexcusable than Montoyos oversight

Posted
Question about the new rules.

 

If a pitcher comes in, faces 1 batter and gets the 3rd out of the 7th inning....and then comes out to face the first batter the 8th inning - can he be taken out after facing the first batter of the 8th inning (because he technically finished an inning) - or must he face at least 2 batters in the 8th inning (3 total)?

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Must face 3 batters before getting taken out as far as I know....but I’ll take another look

Posted
The only thing a manager is required to give the umpire is the starting lineup and batting order. No potential substitutes need to be listed.

 

I get that just because the majority of us don’t know the rules, that we would decide something based on feelings, but that’s not how sports are played. It’s in the rule book that Waguespack is eligible to enter the game, the ump got it wrong. End of story

 

That doesn’t excuse the lack of attention to detail on Montoyos part as I’m sure these guys truly believe that potential subs should be given, but the fact remains they are not. The second fact that the ump doesn’t know this rule is even more inexcusable than Montoyos oversight

 

Do we know for certain that the Jays didn't mess up when recalling him? The recall transaction isn't listed anywhere.

Posted
The only thing a manager is required to give the umpire is the starting lineup and batting order. No potential substitutes need to be listed.

 

I get that just because the majority of us don’t know the rules, that we would decide something based on feelings, but that’s not how sports are played. It’s in the rule book that Waguespack is eligible to enter the game, the ump got it wrong. End of story

 

That doesn’t excuse the lack of attention to detail on Montoyos part as I’m sure these guys truly believe that potential subs should be given, but the fact remains they are not. The second fact that the ump doesn’t know this rule is even more inexcusable than Montoyos oversight

 

All Montoyo has to do is appeal the decision to the higher ups but it's obvious he's too much of a weak moron

Posted
Do we know for certain that the Jays didn't mess up when recalling him? The recall transaction isn't listed anywhere.

 

If his recall wasn’t reported to MLB he wouldn’t be allowed to dress for the game.

 

But even if that were the case, there’s no way the ump or opposing manager would know about a transaction not being reported.

Posted
Must face 3 batters before getting taken out as far as I know....but I’ll take another look

 

I think since he finished an inning, he could be taken out afterwards at any time.

Posted

Three-batter minimum

Official rule: The starting or any relief pitcher is required to pitch to a minimum of three batters, including the batter then at bat (or any substitute batter), until such batters are put out or reach base, or until the offensive team is put out, unless the substitute pitcher sustains injury or illness which, in the umpire crew chief’s judgment, incapacitates him from further play as a pitcher.

 

To me, that says a pitcher must face either 3 hitters, or remain in the game at least until the end of the inning.

Posted
If his recall wasn’t reported to MLB he wouldn’t be allowed to dress for the game

 

I can see that mistake being made and no one noticing. It would also be very easy for the person who said it was a lineup card mistake to have gotten it slightly wrong (ie, he wasn't on the card because he wasn't eligible to be dressed).

Posted
I think since he finished an inning, he could be taken out afterwards at any time.

 

Yeah my understanding of the rule is that after the inning ends, that pitcher can be switched regardless of how many batters they face/faced/will face next inning.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
This rigid use of the bullpen is going to drive me insane. Romano should not pitch unless they score.

 

I’m fine with Romano here. Tie game in the 8th and its top of the order. We need wins.

Posted
I’m fine with Romano here. Tie game in the 8th and its top of the order. We need wins.

 

same, you cant guarantee we need him tomorrow.

Posted
All Montoyo has to do is appeal the decision to the higher ups but it's obvious he's too much of a weak moron

 

I don’t think he can appeal that after the game is over unless he has actually indicated he is playing under protest

Posted
same, you cant guarantee we need him tomorrow.

 

most are fine with Romano, but if this goes to extras and Shun pitches, I'm going to lose my s***!

Posted
That Romano slider is nasty

 

We have Romano for the next 6 years. The next 3 years at league min. That's really a mouth watering thought. This kid is a lights out high leverage reliever.

Posted
This offense has been extremely humdrum. They made Toussaint look like a young Pedro Martinez

 

He was dealing though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...