saskjayfan Old-Timey Member Posted March 7, 2020 Posted March 7, 2020 i hope we get a look at butterbean today.
Deadpool Old-Timey Member Posted March 7, 2020 Posted March 7, 2020 Good job by Thorton to recover after the error and the umpire interference.
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted March 7, 2020 Posted March 7, 2020 i hope we get a look at butterbean today.
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted March 7, 2020 Posted March 7, 2020 That wind is killing these guys in the field.
Deadpool Old-Timey Member Posted March 7, 2020 Posted March 7, 2020 Good thing they've got a s*****, craptacular stadium for spring training as well as the MLB.
Deadpool Old-Timey Member Posted March 7, 2020 Posted March 7, 2020 Let's go ahead and call that back to back homers, 'cause y'know, f*** Red Sox stadiums.
Pinkfloid Verified Member Posted March 7, 2020 Posted March 7, 2020 Hope Vladdy didn't pull a Judge right there and break a rib
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted March 7, 2020 Posted March 7, 2020 lol @ Vladdy... Shaw barreled that ball... Wow!
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted March 7, 2020 Posted March 7, 2020 Let's go ahead and call that back to back homers, 'cause y'know, f*** Red Sox stadiums. lol... yeah, Vlad unloaded a missile.
Deadpool Old-Timey Member Posted March 7, 2020 Posted March 7, 2020 lol... yeah, Vlad unloaded a missile. That was easy 400' if the garbage wall didn't get in the way.
Jimcanuck Old-Timey Member Posted March 7, 2020 Posted March 7, 2020 No point in keeping Moran around any longer.
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted March 7, 2020 Posted March 7, 2020 Noice to get some Pearson today.
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted March 7, 2020 Posted March 7, 2020 Nate *10 STRAIGHT BALLS* Pearson!
Jimcanuck Old-Timey Member Posted March 7, 2020 Posted March 7, 2020 Nate *10 STRAIGHT BALLS* Pearson! Was that Tercet or Gruber?
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted March 7, 2020 Posted March 7, 2020 Was that Tercet or Gruber? tercet... you're up in BORED Jimbo.
Jimcanuck Old-Timey Member Posted March 7, 2020 Posted March 7, 2020 Pearson has a nice clean delivery, reminds me of Halladay
bones10 Old-Timey Member Posted March 7, 2020 Posted March 7, 2020 You guys think tercet still lurks ?
Carlos Danger Old-Timey Member Posted March 7, 2020 Posted March 7, 2020 Merryweather matching Pearson
DigitalRock Old-Timey Member Posted March 7, 2020 Posted March 7, 2020 You guys think tercet still lurks ? I'm pretty sure he is always lurking ...into Women's windows trying to get a peek at what he has been missing all his life.
max silver Old-Timey Member Posted March 7, 2020 Posted March 7, 2020 Oh it's a developmental year. No point in trying to win, then. Puig is almost a 2 win upgrade on Hernandez lol, not sure how that's marginal. There's a lot wrong in here but I think that will suffice. I guess I just don't agree with the projections for Teoscar vs. Puig. Initially I missed the fact that the fangraphs depth chart projections for Puig were only for 86 games vs 125 for Teoscar, my bad there. To my eye Teoscar showed real improvements both in the field and with the bat last year, and I just don't see why he should project so low for 2020. I guess the projection systems don't think his improvements were sustainable. I saw a player in 2019 that was getting better, I just don't see why he projects to get worse going forward. When I look at Puig's numbers I see a lot of red flags that suggest he's going backwards in a lot of key categories, his plate discipline numbers are declining, and his walk and k-rates are also getting worse over time, not just a one year dip but something that's been happening over several seasons. His BABIP wasn't overly low, and WOBA and xWOBA are within a few points of each other, so to my (admittedly untrained) eye this suggest that his bat going forward very well could be only league average. Maybe he outperforms his 1.2 WAR in 2019, but I wouldn't be willing to bet money on that. With the off the field and on the field issues that have plagued Puig I guess I just don't think the upside outweighs the drawbacks. This seems to be an unpopular opinion but it just looks like to me that Teoscar and Puig are very likely to put up similar value on the field. But one guy hasn't even hit arbitration yet and gets paid peanuts, and the other guy is a free agent that will get paid real dollars. One guy seems to be liked by his teammates (although the sunflower seed thing would be annoying as f***) and hasn't caused any issues that we know of, and the other guy wore out his welcome with the Dodgers.
Brownie19 Old-Timey Member Posted March 8, 2020 Posted March 8, 2020 I guess I just don't agree with the projections for Teoscar vs. Puig. Initially I missed the fact that the fangraphs depth chart projections for Puig were only for 86 games vs 125 for Teoscar, my bad there. To my eye Teoscar showed real improvements both in the field and with the bat last year, and I just don't see why he should project so low for 2020. I guess the projection systems don't think his improvements were sustainable. I saw a player in 2019 that was getting better, I just don't see why he projects to get worse going forward. When I look at Puig's numbers I see a lot of red flags that suggest he's going backwards in a lot of key categories, his plate discipline numbers are declining, and his walk and k-rates are also getting worse over time, not just a one year dip but something that's been happening over several seasons. His BABIP wasn't overly low, and WOBA and xWOBA are within a few points of each other, so to my (admittedly untrained) eye this suggest that his bat going forward very well could be only league average. Maybe he outperforms his 1.2 WAR in 2019, but I wouldn't be willing to bet money on that. With the off the field and on the field issues that have plagued Puig I guess I just don't think the upside outweighs the drawbacks. This seems to be an unpopular opinion but it just looks like to me that Teoscar and Puig are very likely to put up similar value on the field. But one guy hasn't even hit arbitration yet and gets paid peanuts, and the other guy is a free agent that will get paid real dollars. One guy seems to be liked by his teammates (although the sunflower seed thing would be annoying as f***) and hasn't caused any issues that we know of, and the other guy wore out his welcome with the Dodgers. This argument is moot because we can accommodate both Puig and Teo in the lineup. Puig in RF, Teo at DH (primarily). Signing Puig boots Alford and/or Tellez off the team.
FrozenRopes Verified Member Posted March 8, 2020 Posted March 8, 2020 This argument is moot because we can accommodate both Puig and Teo in the lineup. Puig in RF, Teo at DH (primarily). Signing Puig boots Alford and/or Tellez off the team. Alford is not a big league ball player (regardless of his athleticism). Puig and Tellez are a toss up as far as who brings what to your team. If Puig is a bad clubhouse influence why would you want him around young, impressionable players. Better off bringing in guys like Panik.
Brownie19 Old-Timey Member Posted March 8, 2020 Posted March 8, 2020 Alford is not a big league ball player (regardless of his athleticism). Puig and Tellez are a toss up as far as who brings what to your team. If Puig is a bad clubhouse influence why would you want him around young, impressionable players. Better off bringing in guys like Panik. What does Tellez bring that Puig doesn't? Tellez can't run or play defense and projects (somehow) as a league average hitter. There's certainly a chance he blossoms and deserves the at bats, but there's a much strong possibility that Puig is far superior. Plus - it just lets us stash Tellez in AAA....he can force his way onto our roster in a number of ways if he breaks out (takes over at DH from Teo, Shaw doesn't rebound, injuries, etc.). And why are we better off bringing in another version of Goins exactly?
max silver Old-Timey Member Posted March 8, 2020 Posted March 8, 2020 (edited) This argument is moot because we can accommodate both Puig and Teo in the lineup. Puig in RF, Teo at DH (primarily). Signing Puig boots Alford and/or Tellez off the team. I just don't think the Jays are interested in lower end outfield upgrades this off-season. They've already passed on inexpensive guys like Pillar and Calhoun who would have upgraded the overall roster, but without the baggage that Puig brings. Rightly or wrongly they look committed to figuring out which guys in their glut of AAA and AAAA outfielders has a chance to turn into something. Could certainly be that none of Alford/Fisher/McKinney/Davis ever amount to even 4th outfielders though. Edited March 8, 2020 by max silver typo
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted March 8, 2020 Posted March 8, 2020 I just don't think the Jays are interested in lower end outfield upgrades this off-season. They've already passed on inexpensive guys like Pillar and Calhoun who would have upgraded the overall roster, but without the baggage that Puig brings. Rightly or wrongly they look committed to figuring out which guys in their glut of AAA and AAAA outfielders has a chance to turn into something. Could certainly be that none of Alford/Fisher/McKinney/Davis ever amount to even 4th outfielders though. Ah, the problem here seems to be that you believe Puig is much worse than he actually is.
Johnny King Vancouver Canadians - A+ LHP He took the Loss, but the 19-year-old southpaw gave up one run on five hits and a walk in five innings on Wednesday night. Explore Johnny King News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now