Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 6.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Verified Member
Posted

Biggio is looking really good.

 

Statcast numbers:

 

15.4% Barrel%. It's about the same as Brandon Lowe's.

 

.369 xWOBA / .453 xWOBACON

 

92.5 mph avg EV (Ranked 16th in MLB min 30 batted ball events)

 

66th percentile sprint speed

 

48.7% Hard Hit rate (Ranked 33rd min 30 batted ball events)

Verified Member
Posted
Kyle Tucker alone would be so overly sufficient that Houston would probably stop returning Toronto's phone calls.

 

Derek Fisher is a toolsy player who they would definitely let go because of his demonstrated bust potential. Imagine if Billy McKinney had a black guy's name and some black guy tools but was actually still white and maybe not any better. They have at least a dozen intriguing pitching prospects to deal. I think several other teams would go harder for Stroman though (Houston's pitching depth is not bad and Stroman is not the Ace injection that a team like Houston will really be looking for).

 

Derek Fisher + another good piece might be fair in a vacuum, but I would be left disappointed regardless if that's who we end up netting for Stroman.

Community Moderator
Posted
Derek Fisher + another good piece might be fair in a vacuum, but I would be left disappointed regardless if that's who we end up netting for Stroman.

 

Honestly depends on the second piece. Houston has some solid dudes on the farm.

Posted
Derek Fisher + another good piece might be fair in a vacuum, but I would be left disappointed regardless if that's who we end up netting for Stroman.

 

Plate discipline is also phenomenal. I am guessing he is up there in out of zone swing rate.

Posted
Atkins is on the hot seat and needs guys that can contribute soon so my guess is he rolls the dice on more post-hype sleepers who are "big league ready." Derek Fisher seems like a strong possibility but he screams Drury or McKinney to me.
Old-Timey Member
Posted
If Derek Fisher is the headliner of a Marcus Stroman trade this team will never sniff the playoffs under this management. Gross
Community Moderator
Posted
Atkins is on the hot seat and needs guys that can contribute soon so my guess is he rolls the dice on more post-hype sleepers who are "big league ready." Derek Fisher seems like a strong possibility but he screams Drury or McKinney to me.

 

He might suck but he's more like Jake Marisnick (maybe without CF instincts) than Drury or McKinney. I've seen 60 and 70 scouting grades on the power and speed. Even if the swing and miss prevents him from being a starter there are bench skills there, unlike Drury and McKinney where the peripheral skills don't really exist so if they aren't hitting they aren't big leaguers.

 

He would have to be the third piece or secondary piece in a Stroman deal an all likelihood.

Old-Timey Member
Posted

Fisher would be a huge letdown but unfortunately I could see that. My guess is Atkins will try to get as much pitching as possible, so if we are talking Astros then probably Bukauskas/Abreu types.

 

Actually, I don't think Atkins has made a bad deal with the Astros (Liriano/Hernandez, Osuna/Giles-Paulino-Perez, and Diaz/Thornton), so dealing with the Astros doesn't scare me as much as if he were talking to Brian Cashman again.

Verified Member
Posted

I could see Corbin Martin, Derek Fisher + another pieces for Stroman.

 

Fisher actually has better minor league numbers than I thought. Career .858 OPS in the minors. He can take his walks and has good power.

Posted
I would accept Graterol + Balazovic/Duran

 

Would you do Brusdar Graterol + Trevor Larnach + Jhoan Duran + Jordan Balazovic

 

for Giles + Stroman?

Old-Timey Member
Posted

Atkins the kind of guy to trade for Brent Rooker, Stephen Gonsalves and Lamonte Wade then say he's really happy with the near ready talent they got. I kind of lost a lot of faith in them for evaluating major league talent, which is strange cause the strength of the new regime seems to be drafting.

 

 

If you trade Stroman and you don't get one of Kirilloff or Lewis it's a bad trade IMO, they have other good prospects but Stroman is good enough to get that kind of return.

Posted
Would you do Brusdar Graterol + Trevor Larnach + Jhoan Duran + Jordan Balazovic

 

for Giles + Stroman?

 

It's a great haul. I'm all for trying to pry Kirilloff or another top hitting prospect from elsewhere, but if teams balk at giving up the elite young bats, we at least need to raid the f*** out of a high end pitching cupboard.

Posted
He might suck but he's more like Jake Marisnick (maybe without CF instincts) than Drury or McKinney. I've seen 60 and 70 scouting grades on the power and speed. Even if the swing and miss prevents him from being a starter there are bench skills there, unlike Drury and McKinney where the peripheral skills don't really exist so if they aren't hitting they aren't big leaguers.

 

He would have to be the third piece or secondary piece in a Stroman deal an all likelihood.

 

Fair points but it doesn't seem like he gets very high grades on his defense despite having good speed. He's almost 26 and his bat looks like s***. We got Teoscar (who at the time was more interesting IMO) for an old Liriano. Fisher seems like the type of guy that can be had for an ok reliever. He has very very little value IMO.

Posted
Fair points but it doesn't seem like he gets very high grades on his defense despite having good speed. He's almost 26 and his bat looks like s***. We got Teoscar (who at the time was more interesting IMO) for an old Liriano. Fisher seems like the type of guy that can be had for an ok reliever. He has very very little value IMO.

 

+1

 

Get guys with upside, not mediocre borderline replacement players

Verified Member
Posted

The Sonny Gray trade from the A's to the Yankees might be a good comp for Stroman.

 

The A's got James Kaprielian (#87 prospect), Jorge Mateo (#85 prospect), and Dustin Fowler (unraked)

Old-Timey Member
Posted (edited)
Atkins the kind of guy to trade for Brent Rooker, Stephen Gonsalves and Lamonte Wade then say he's really happy with the near ready talent they got. I kind of lost a lot of faith in them for evaluating major league talent, which is strange cause the strength of the new regime seems to be drafting.

 

 

If you trade Stroman and you don't get one of Kirilloff or Lewis it's a bad trade IMO, they have other good prospects but Stroman is good enough to get that kind of return.

 

One thing with Atkins is he goes after players who other teams don't want to protect on their 40 man roster. Just last trade deadline we saw Paulino, Perez, Wall, Waguespack, Merryweather, McKinney, etc, who other teams gave up either to take off the existing 40 man or to not have to make a decision on that winter. Then this winter we saw it with Thornton who the Astros had to protect prior to the rule 5 or risk losing him.

 

Unfortunately that may be where we have to start as we try to guess the returns on certain players. One would hope that Stro and Giles would be able to net real prospects regardless of 40 man roster implications, but we have to set ourselves up for reality.

Edited by glory
Community Moderator
Posted
Fair points but it doesn't seem like he gets very high grades on his defense despite having good speed. He's almost 26 and his bat looks like s***. We got Teoscar (who at the time was more interesting IMO) for an old Liriano. Fisher seems like the type of guy that can be had for an ok reliever. He has very very little value IMO.

 

+1

 

Get guys with upside, not mediocre borderline replacement players

 

It's difficult to think of realistic trade scenarios. You have to really bend over backwards to consider things from the other team's perspective.

 

Derek Fisher was a top 100 prospect a couple of seasons ago for Houston, and an easy/consensus top 10 prospect for them for a couple of years. He hasn't really had that much playing time to fail in the majors because they are so deep. His value is objectively down but I doubt Houston thinks he has negligible value and I doubt they would internally characterize him as a replacement level player. He does not project to be replacement level, for one thing.

 

Fisher objectively does have upside.

 

When Houston acquired Liriano there is a chance their analytics department thought he would be a legitimate weapon out of the pen on their playoff run.

 

The hypothetical negotiation is something like - "we'll agree to Fisher as an adequate secondary piece if you give us our guy as the centrepiece"

 

TL;DR if Houston is in the trade market they are hoping to extract value from Derek Fisher so he is worth examining

 

FWIW Fisher has played at a 20/20 pace during his s***** MLB sample size and has been a positive baserunner and +10 defender. There is legit breakout potential with him.

Posted
It's difficult to think of realistic trade scenarios. You have to really bend over backwards to consider things from the other team's perspective.

 

Derek Fisher was a top 100 prospect a couple of seasons ago for Houston, and an easy/consensus top 10 prospect for them for a couple of years. He hasn't really had that much playing time to fail in the majors because they are so deep. His value is objectively down but I doubt Houston thinks he has negligible value and I doubt they would internally characterize him as a replacement level player. He does not project to be replacement level, for one thing.

 

Fisher objectively does have upside.

 

When Houston acquired Liriano there is a chance their analytics department thought he would be a legitimate weapon out of the pen on their playoff run.

 

The hypothetical negotiation is something like - "we'll agree to Fisher as an adequate secondary piece if you give us our guy as the centrepiece"

 

TL;DR if Houston is in the trade market they are hoping to extract value from Derek Fisher so he is worth examining

 

FWIW Fisher has played at a 20/20 pace during his s***** MLB sample size and has been a positive baserunner and +10 defender. There is legit breakout potential with him.

 

He sucks!

Community Moderator
Posted
He sucks!

 

My fine friend as a complete and utter rebuttal let me copy and paste what I previously wrote into this website but fivefold

 

It's difficult to think of realistic trade scenarios. You have to really bend over backwards to consider things from the other team's perspective.

 

Derek Fisher was a top 100 prospect a couple of seasons ago for Houston, and an easy/consensus top 10 prospect for them for a couple of years. He hasn't really had that much playing time to fail in the majors because they are so deep. His value is objectively down but I doubt Houston thinks he has negligible value and I doubt they would internally characterize him as a replacement level player. He does not project to be replacement level, for one thing.

 

Fisher objectively does have upside.

 

When Houston acquired Liriano there is a chance their analytics department thought he would be a legitimate weapon out of the pen on their playoff run.

 

The hypothetical negotiation is something like - "we'll agree to Fisher as an adequate secondary piece if you give us our guy as the centrepiece"

 

TL;DR if Houston is in the trade market they are hoping to extract value from Derek Fisher so he is worth examining

 

FWIW Fisher has played at a 20/20 pace during his s***** MLB sample size and has been a positive baserunner and +10 defender. There is legit breakout potential with him.

 

It's difficult to think of realistic trade scenarios. You have to really bend over backwards to consider things from the other team's perspective.

 

Derek Fisher was a top 100 prospect a couple of seasons ago for Houston, and an easy/consensus top 10 prospect for them for a couple of years. He hasn't really had that much playing time to fail in the majors because they are so deep. His value is objectively down but I doubt Houston thinks he has negligible value and I doubt they would internally characterize him as a replacement level player. He does not project to be replacement level, for one thing.

 

Fisher objectively does have upside.

 

When Houston acquired Liriano there is a chance their analytics department thought he would be a legitimate weapon out of the pen on their playoff run.

 

The hypothetical negotiation is something like - "we'll agree to Fisher as an adequate secondary piece if you give us our guy as the centrepiece"

 

TL;DR if Houston is in the trade market they are hoping to extract value from Derek Fisher so he is worth examining

 

FWIW Fisher has played at a 20/20 pace during his s***** MLB sample size and has been a positive baserunner and +10 defender. There is legit breakout potential with him.

 

It's difficult to think of realistic trade scenarios. You have to really bend over backwards to consider things from the other team's perspective.

 

Derek Fisher was a top 100 prospect a couple of seasons ago for Houston, and an easy/consensus top 10 prospect for them for a couple of years. He hasn't really had that much playing time to fail in the majors because they are so deep. His value is objectively down but I doubt Houston thinks he has negligible value and I doubt they would internally characterize him as a replacement level player. He does not project to be replacement level, for one thing.

 

Fisher objectively does have upside.

 

When Houston acquired Liriano there is a chance their analytics department thought he would be a legitimate weapon out of the pen on their playoff run.

 

The hypothetical negotiation is something like - "we'll agree to Fisher as an adequate secondary piece if you give us our guy as the centrepiece"

 

TL;DR if Houston is in the trade market they are hoping to extract value from Derek Fisher so he is worth examining

 

FWIW Fisher has played at a 20/20 pace during his s***** MLB sample size and has been a positive baserunner and +10 defender. There is legit breakout potential with him.

It's difficult to think of realistic trade scenarios. You have to really bend over backwards to consider things from the other team's perspective.

 

Derek Fisher was a top 100 prospect a couple of seasons ago for Houston, and an easy/consensus top 10 prospect for them for a couple of years. He hasn't really had that much playing time to fail in the majors because they are so deep. His value is objectively down but I doubt Houston thinks he has negligible value and I doubt they would internally characterize him as a replacement level player. He does not project to be replacement level, for one thing.

 

Fisher objectively does have upside.

 

When Houston acquired Liriano there is a chance their analytics department thought he would be a legitimate weapon out of the pen on their playoff run.

 

The hypothetical negotiation is something like - "we'll agree to Fisher as an adequate secondary piece if you give us our guy as the centrepiece"

 

TL;DR if Houston is in the trade market they are hoping to extract value from Derek Fisher so he is worth examining

 

FWIW Fisher has played at a 20/20 pace during his s***** MLB sample size and has been a positive baserunner and +10 defender. There is legit breakout potential with him.

It's difficult to think of realistic trade scenarios. You have to really bend over backwards to consider things from the other team's perspective.

 

Derek Fisher was a top 100 prospect a couple of seasons ago for Houston, and an easy/consensus top 10 prospect for them for a couple of years. He hasn't really had that much playing time to fail in the majors because they are so deep. His value is objectively down but I doubt Houston thinks he has negligible value and I doubt they would internally characterize him as a replacement level player. He does not project to be replacement level, for one thing.

 

Fisher objectively does have upside.

 

When Houston acquired Liriano there is a chance their analytics department thought he would be a legitimate weapon out of the pen on their playoff run.

 

The hypothetical negotiation is something like - "we'll agree to Fisher as an adequate secondary piece if you give us our guy as the centrepiece"

 

TL;DR if Houston is in the trade market they are hoping to extract value from Derek Fisher so he is worth examining

 

FWIW Fisher has played at a 20/20 pace during his s***** MLB sample size and has been a positive baserunner and +10 defender. There is legit breakout potential with him.

Posted

 

oh..

 

If true, that's a disservice to the org. *smh* Either that or his ask is astronomical.

Old-Timey Member
Posted

The sad thing is, overpaying Stroman on a 5 year deal is probably more reasonable than giving Grichuk 5/53.

 

Stro is going to be close to a 4 win player this season, and he's routinely above a 3 WAR any time he's been healthy. Why in the world they prioritized Grichuk at a non bargain price and not players like Stro and Giles is baffling to me.

 

They better be able to develop SPs like Cleveland did/does, otherwise this is just going to get a lot uglier before it gets better.

Posted
The sad thing is, overpaying Stroman on a 5 year deal is probably more reasonable than giving Grichuk 5/53.

 

Stro is going to be close to a 4 win player this season, and he's routinely above a 3 WAR any time he's been healthy. Why in the world they prioritized Grichuk at a non bargain price and not players like Stro and Giles is baffling to me.

 

They better be able to develop SPs like Cleveland did/does, otherwise this is just going to get a lot uglier before it gets better.

 

Can you message me when you have a new point or opinion to make? Thanks.

Posted
Can you message me when you have a new point or opinion to make? Thanks.

 

lol... it's true, the regurgitation has caught fire Gibby levels.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...