KingKat Old-Timey Member Posted January 7, 2016 Posted January 7, 2016 Griffey really gets viewed through rose coloured lenses. There's an assumption that he must have been clean because he wore a backwards baseball cap and smiled and whatever but any other player who put up similar power numbers is assumed to have cheated. I obviously don't know more than anyone else does but making assumptions that any player was clean from that era seems incredibly naive. The same shadow hangs over everyone which kind of sucks if there actually were any clean players but that's just the reality of that era.
closetjaysfan Verified Member Posted January 7, 2016 Posted January 7, 2016 Griffey really gets viewed through rose coloured lenses. There's an assumption that he must have been clean because he wore a backwards baseball cap and smiled and whatever but any other player who put up similar power numbers is assumed to have cheated. I obviously don't know more than anyone else does but making assumptions that any player was clean from that era seems incredibly naive. The same shadow hangs over everyone which kind of sucks if there actually were any clean players but that's just the reality of that era. For me, what makes Griffey stand out when compared to the likes of Bonds, McGuire, Pettite, Clemmens and so on is the way that his skills naturally eroded over time. Whereas Bonds for example has his best seasons from age 37-41. What is common between Griffey and Bonds is that they were both natural Bo Jackson type athletes (good at everything), the difference is that Bonds wasnt satisfied with that.
KingKat Old-Timey Member Posted January 7, 2016 Posted January 7, 2016 For me, what makes Griffey stand out when compared to the likes of Bonds, McGuire, Pettite, Clemmens and so on is the way that his skills naturally eroded over time. Whereas Bonds for example has his best seasons from age 37-41. What is common between Griffey and Bonds is that they were both natural Bo Jackson type athletes (good at everything), the difference is that Bonds wasnt satisfied with that. Well Bonds, if accounts are to be believed, got jealous of the players who were putting up big home run totals, people like McGwire, Sosa and Griffey. People forget that Griffey had his own Marris chase but it was washed away by the 1994 strike. Like I said, I have no idea if Griffey used or not but I don't have any particular reason to feel he was clean. His decline doesn't really sway me one way or the other.
burlingtonbandit Old-Timey Member Posted January 7, 2016 Posted January 7, 2016 Griffey gets the most votes of alltime - Bagwell had more WAR....I never would have guessed that... Griffey had 74 WAR in his first 12 seasons at the age of 31. HOF just isn't about career WAR. Larry Walker has more career WAR than Tim Raines yet he hardly got any votes this year.
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted January 7, 2016 Posted January 7, 2016 Well Bonds, if accounts are to be believed, got jealous of the players who were putting up big home run totals, people like McGwire, Sosa and Griffey. People forget that Griffey had his own Marris chase but it was washed away by the 1994 strike. Like I said, I have no idea if Griffey used or not but I don't have any particular reason to feel he was clean. His decline doesn't really sway me one way or the other. He didn't decine by age either...he had injuries.
intentional wok Old-Timey Member Posted January 7, 2016 Posted January 7, 2016 Even if you're self righteous about PED use about Bonds and co. there's no defensible reason to not vote Griffey. An omission like that deserves every form of ridicule. As far as I'm concerned if you want to be a chud about Bonds, etc., at least that's a reason. Why no Griffey, though? Speak up, boy.
burlingtonbandit Old-Timey Member Posted January 7, 2016 Posted January 7, 2016 Has anyone here actually been to Cooperstown? I've never been yet only live a few hours away. Definitely want to go when Doc gets inducted.
Cyborg Verified Member Posted January 7, 2016 Posted January 7, 2016 It's perfectly reasonable to not vote for Griffey. You know he will be elected, so no need to vote for him and you can give a vote to someone else deserving.
RealAccountant Old-Timey Member Posted January 7, 2016 Posted January 7, 2016 There is more to hall of fame then just numbers. Griffey was the face of baseball. He had huge power numbers before PEDs
Jimcanuck Old-Timey Member Posted January 7, 2016 Posted January 7, 2016 Yeah I'm not sure why so many people are outraged that three people didn't vote for Griffey. Should be more outrage over the hundred who won't vote for Bonds due to self righteous dumbf***ery. Following a normal aging curve Bonds is borderline
intentional wok Old-Timey Member Posted January 7, 2016 Posted January 7, 2016 It's perfectly reasonable to not vote for Griffey. You know he will be elected, so no need to vote for him and you can give a vote to someone else deserving. I kind of undermined my own point earlier in the thread with my badly written last post, but what I meant to say was that there should be no defensible reason to not vote Griffey. The HOF system sucks and should never incentivize not voting for a first-balloter. As it is, the system does, but I think the non-votes should make a statement. I'd like to think it was a strategic reasons but you can never rule out stubbornness/statement votes. There is more to hall of fame then just numbers. Griffey was the face of baseball. Eric Sogard - second-ballot HOFer.
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted January 7, 2016 Posted January 7, 2016 Following a normal aging curve Bonds is borderline I don't think you know what borderline means, but OK. There goes crazy Jim again.
GD Old-Timey Member Posted January 7, 2016 Posted January 7, 2016 Has anyone here actually been to Cooperstown? I've never been yet only live a few hours away. Definitely want to go when Doc gets inducted. It's really really wonderful. Quaint little town. Got to play at Doubleday too. Great experience.
TRM Verified Member Posted January 7, 2016 Posted January 7, 2016 Following a normal aging curve Bonds is borderline wat
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted January 7, 2016 Posted January 7, 2016 wat You don't want to see how far the rabbit hole goes.
Olerud363 Old-Timey Member Posted January 7, 2016 Posted January 7, 2016 Following a normal aging curve Bonds is borderline 500+ homers... 3 MVPs... 500 sb 8 gold gloves... = border line?? And to make it fair no one else would be on anything... so the 500+ homers would really mean something.
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted January 7, 2016 Posted January 7, 2016 Always love watching it, but now it's so apropos Griffey Jr. Goodbye Baseball, Hello Cooperstown
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted January 7, 2016 Posted January 7, 2016 500+ homers... 3 MVPs... 500 sb 8 gold gloves... = border line?? And to make it fair no one else would be on anything... so the 500+ homers would really mean something. Exactly MgGuire and Sosa natural talent <<< Bonds
Brownie19 Old-Timey Member Posted January 7, 2016 Posted January 7, 2016 It's really really wonderful. Quaint little town. Got to play at Doubleday too. Great experience. It's a beautiful place...perfect really. GD - very jealous you got to play at Doubleday. Our team talked about it for years, but decided it was going to be too difficult to organize.
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted January 7, 2016 Posted January 7, 2016 Seriously though, how has there never been a unanimous Hall Of Fame inductee??? Even recently... Who are the 3 or 4 people who DIDN'T vote for Griffey Jr, Ripken Jr, Nolan Ryan, George Brett, etc. and why?!?!
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted January 7, 2016 Posted January 7, 2016 Seriously though, how has there never been a unanimous Hall Of Fame inductee??? Even recently... Who are the 3 or 4 people who DIDN'T vote for Griffey Jr, Ripken Jr, Nolan Ryan, George Brett, etc. and why?!?! Some guys have a legitimate rule that no player ever gets in on the first ballot I wish I was making that up
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted January 7, 2016 Posted January 7, 2016 Some guys have a legitimate rule that no player ever gets in on the first ballot I wish I was making that up http://www.reactiongifs.us/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/shaking_head_breaking_bad.gif
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted January 7, 2016 Posted January 7, 2016 Oh, and those people should lose their voting rights
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted January 7, 2016 Posted January 7, 2016 Oh, and those people should lose their voting rights A lot of people should lose their voting rights but never do. As far as I'm concerned, anyone who hasn't used all ten spots the past few years should lose their vote but that's well over half of the entire pool.
z3r0s Old-Timey Member Posted January 7, 2016 Posted January 7, 2016 A lot of people should lose their voting rights but never do. As far as I'm concerned, anyone who hasn't used all ten spots the past few years should lose their vote but that's well over half of the entire pool. Surely you don't want to rob Jeff Blair of his vote!!!!!
thatoneguy Old-Timey Member Posted January 7, 2016 Posted January 7, 2016 Some guys have a legitimate rule that no player ever gets in on the first ballot I wish I was making that up Wasn't there a couple who never voted for pitchers or something like that as well?
Captain Adama Old-Timey Member Posted January 7, 2016 Posted January 7, 2016 Griffey had 74 WAR in his first 12 seasons at the age of 31. HOF just isn't about career WAR. Larry Walker has more career WAR than Tim Raines yet he hardly got any votes this year. All you're doing is pointing out how stupid the voting process for the HOF is. Walker deserves to be in the hall.
Terminator Old-Timey Member Posted January 7, 2016 Author Posted January 7, 2016 Seems like a yearly ritual for me where every single year Mike Mussina isn't voted in I go to his fangraphs page and check out his numbers and am wowed and amazed like it's the first time I've seen his numbers. What a career.
43211234 Verified Member Posted January 7, 2016 Posted January 7, 2016 I thought Jim Edmonds would get more votes. A victim of the ten player limit I guess.
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted January 7, 2016 Posted January 7, 2016 I thought Jim Edmonds would get more votes. A victim of the ten player limit I guess. Dunno how you can say that when most of the voters don't use all of them.
Arjun Nimmala New Hampshire Fisher Cats - AA SS The Jays have promoted the 20-year-old shortstop to Double-A New Hampshire! He hit .241/.362/.483 (.845) in his 23-game return to Vancouver. Explore Arjun Nimmala News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now