Cyborg Verified Member Posted January 2, 2016 Posted January 2, 2016 Interesting that Donaldson had the 7th highest Babip in the last 10 years He didn't. You have to re-sort.
Spanky99 Old-Timey Member Posted January 2, 2016 Posted January 2, 2016 Interesting that Donaldson had the 7th highest Babip in the last 10 years 329th.
Jimcanuck Old-Timey Member Posted January 2, 2016 Posted January 2, 2016 Yes. Very excited to have Smoak's .699 career OPS coming out of the 1B/DH spot. Hommmerunnnzzzz is good. not ideal, but he is better than Cola taking into account D and luck
Grant77 Old-Timey Member Posted January 2, 2016 Posted January 2, 2016 not ideal, but he is better than Cola taking into account D and luck Not necessarily. We don't know what a normal BABIP is for Colabello and his D could be above average.
TBJ12 Verified Member Posted January 2, 2016 Posted January 2, 2016 not ideal, but he is better than Cola taking into account D and luck Steamer doesn't agree, they have Colabello at 0.7 WAR and Smoak at 0.4.
Orgfiller Old-Timey Member Posted January 2, 2016 Posted January 2, 2016 Interesting that Donaldson had the 7th highest Babip in the last 10 years You forgot to re-sort the list. Donaldson's .314 BABIP is perfectly normal and not even the highest mark he's ever posted.
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted January 2, 2016 Posted January 2, 2016 You forgot to re-sort the list. Donaldson's .314 BABIP is perfectly normal and not even the highest mark he's ever posted. I'm actually suprused it wasn't higher seeing how hard he hits the MF ball all the time.
THANOS Old-Timey Member Posted January 2, 2016 Posted January 2, 2016 I'm actually suprused it wasn't higher seeing how hard he hits the MF ball all the time. His career mark of .303 is only .011 points less playing 1/2 his games in a pitcher's park, so a similar BABIP next year should be very predictable without too much risk, all other things equal, as opposed to Mushroom's crazy rate. Here's an interesting question, how much do you think Mushroom's future projections would change if he manages to repeat another .400 BABIP season in 2016?
GD Old-Timey Member Posted January 2, 2016 Posted January 2, 2016 His career mark of .303 is only .011 points less playing 1/2 his games in a pitcher's park, so a similar BABIP next year should be very predictable without too much risk, all other things equal, as opposed to Mushroom's crazy rate. Here's an interesting question, how much do you think Mushroom's future projections would change if he manages to repeat another .400 BABIP season in 2016? Not much. No projection system would ever treat .400 as true talent BABIP. They'd bump up a little. But they can't predict an outlier like that.
Dick_Pole Old-Timey Member Posted January 2, 2016 Posted January 2, 2016 Out of the 18,716 player seasons with at least 350 PA, Collabello had the 7th highest BABIP. http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=bat&lg=all&qual=350&type=8&season=2015&month=0&season1=1901&ind=1&team=0&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=0&sort=13,d So...what...you're saying is...the Jays have the next Ty Cobb? Sweet! List of players who have had at least one .410 or better BABIP season: Babe Ruth George Sisler Rogers Hornsby Ty Cobb Harry Heilmann Chris Colabello I like where this is headed. Extra props to Cola for being the first player to do it in 90 years. Last time it happened was back when baseball gloves were made of corn stalks and duct tape.
RealAccountant Old-Timey Member Posted January 2, 2016 Posted January 2, 2016 Josh Donaldson hits the ball crazy hard. His Babip is less than .320. He hits the ball harder than Colabello. Let's face the fact. Cola's luck will drop to normal next year at which point he will be a below average or at best average hitter Smoak on the other hand might still have another turn in his evolution as an hitter. His power numbers were fantastic. Long term neither is an option. Short term Smoak should be at first and Colabello should be traded for any asset
500LevelSTH Verified Member Posted January 2, 2016 Posted January 2, 2016 I think the argument is already no base on the amount of money Smoak got after a season he appeared to lose his role to Colabello. Smoak has more upside with defence and switch hitting power. personally I Bello more and think his defence is not much of a liability.
glory Old-Timey Member Posted January 2, 2016 Posted January 2, 2016 Smoak had a .243 ISO last season. The power potential is there. Combine that with a 9-10% BB%, and he still has enough potential that I'd be willing to give him a real shot, especially in the 2016 lineup where he won't have to carry a huge responsibility on offense. The issue is if he is playing 2-3 days a week like last year, it will be hard to get any sort of consistency going. They either need to tell Gibbons to do a strict platoon, or trade/demote Colabello, because having a $4m back-up 1B that can't play anywhere else is a pretty bad use of resources. Either give him a real shot, or don't and use that money for another need (probably too late for that now).
gbill2004 Verified Member Posted January 2, 2016 Posted January 2, 2016 Funny, I got banned for a week for suggesting this earlier. Mods on this forum have gone loco.
GD Old-Timey Member Posted January 2, 2016 Posted January 2, 2016 Funny, I got banned for a week for suggesting this earlier. Mods on this forum have gone loco. yeah, that's why you got banned
gbill2004 Verified Member Posted January 2, 2016 Posted January 2, 2016 yeah, that's why you got banned It is. That's what the mod said.
Grant77 Old-Timey Member Posted January 2, 2016 Posted January 2, 2016 (edited) Josh Donaldson hits the ball crazy hard. His Babip is less than .320. He hits the ball harder than Colabello. Let's face the fact. Cola's luck will drop to normal next year at which point he will be a below average or at best average hitter Smoak on the other hand might still have another turn in his evolution as an hitter. His power numbers were fantastic. Long term neither is an option. Short term Smoak should be at first and Colabello should be traded for any asset Batted ball data tells us that this isn't exactly true. Colabello hits a lot more line drives and goes opposite field more often, which should help his BABIP. Only 13 qualified hitters had a LD% of 25 or higher and a lot of the other guys were BABIP monsters as well (Kipnis, Miggy, Votto). Another .400+ BABIP is out of the question, but Chris Johnson has a career .357 mark with the same batted ball profile, so there are exceptions. I wouldn't be that surprised if he put up a high mark in the .330 to .340 range in 2016. Edited January 2, 2016 by Grant77
Cyborg Verified Member Posted January 2, 2016 Posted January 2, 2016 Batted ball data tells us that this isn't exactly true. Colabello hits a lot more line drives and goes opposite field more often, which should help his BABIP. Only 13 qualified hitters had a LD% of 25 or higher and a lot of the other guys were BABIP monsters as well (Kipnis, Miggy, Votto). Another .400+ BABIP is out of the question, but Chris Johnson has a career .357 mark with the same batted ball profile, so there are exceptions. I wouldn't be that surprised if he put up a high mark in the .330 to .340 range in 2016. Chris Johnson is a good comp. He's also awful at major league baseball.
Grant77 Old-Timey Member Posted January 2, 2016 Posted January 2, 2016 Chris Johnson is a good comp. He's also awful at major league baseball. Chris Johnson had real value in his prime, especially in a platoon role. Colabello has much more power, walks more, and doesn't have a platoon split, so I don't think it's a very good comp in that respect.
Orgfiller Old-Timey Member Posted January 3, 2016 Posted January 3, 2016 Chris Johnson had real value in his prime, especially in a platoon role. Colabello has much more power, walks more, and doesn't have a platoon split, so I don't think it's a very good comp in that respect. We don't have enough information about Colabello to know if he has a platoon split or not. Also, Chris Johnson in his prime = one completely BABIP fueled 2.5 WAR season and a whole lot of mediocrity.
Grant77 Old-Timey Member Posted January 3, 2016 Posted January 3, 2016 We don't have enough information about Colabello to know if he has a platoon split or not. Also, Chris Johnson in his prime = one completely BABIP fueled 2.5 WAR season and a whole lot of mediocrity. Anyone with a career .314/.350/.436 line against lefties has some real value on the right team. I'm not overstating his value, you're just being obtuse about it. As for Colabello, a reverse split in 700 at-bats lends itself to a strong possibility that he's not simply a lefty masher. I'd be surprised if you could locate more than 1 or 2 examples of a true lefty masher with a stretch like that. You don't need definitive data to make educated conclusions.
Spanky99 Old-Timey Member Posted January 3, 2016 Posted January 3, 2016 Anyone with a career .314/.350/.436 line against lefties has some real value on the right team. I'm not overstating his value, you're just being obtuse about it. As for Colabello, a reverse split in 700 at-bats lends itself to a strong possibility that he's not simply a lefty masher. I'd be surprised if you could locate more than 1 or 2 examples of a true lefty masher with a stretch like that. You don't need definitive data to make educated conclusions. I was under the assumption it's 2000 AB's.
Grant77 Old-Timey Member Posted January 3, 2016 Posted January 3, 2016 I was under the assumption it's 2000 AB's. Educated guesses can be made with any size sample, the accuracy is just lower. As I said, it's unlikely that a true talent lefty masher would put up a reverse split in 700 at-bats. Not impossible, but no MLB team would see him as that type of player.
Governator Community Moderator Posted January 3, 2016 Posted January 3, 2016 I hope Loup rubs Colabello's head this Spring.
Spanky99 Old-Timey Member Posted January 3, 2016 Posted January 3, 2016 Educated guesses can be made with any size sample, the accuracy is just lower. As I said, it's unlikely that a true talent lefty masher would put up a reverse split in 700 at-bats. Not impossible, but no MLB team would see him as that type of player. We'll see...
FrozenRopes Verified Member Posted January 3, 2016 Posted January 3, 2016 Out of the 18,716 player seasons with at least 350 PA, Collabello had the 7th highest BABIP. http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=bat&lg=all&qual=350&type=8&season=2015&month=0&season1=1901&ind=1&team=0&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=0&sort=13,d This is where stats are meaningless. In the top 15 are Danny Santana, Drew Stubbs and Jose Hernandez. Irrelevant stay by irrelevant players. Cola had a decent year. The guy is 32. He is replaceable in a heart beat.
GD Old-Timey Member Posted January 3, 2016 Posted January 3, 2016 This is where stats are meaningless. In the top 15 are Danny Santana, Drew Stubbs and Jose Hernandez. Irrelevant stay by irrelevant players. Cola had a decent year. The guy is 32. He is replaceable in a heart beat. I don't think you really understand what this discussion is about
dineke Old-Timey Member Posted January 3, 2016 Posted January 3, 2016 Bello better than Rogers Hornsby WOW #stud
Spanky99 Old-Timey Member Posted January 3, 2016 Posted January 3, 2016 I don't think you really understand what this discussion is about Not at all. Actually, there's quite a few missing the point.
JoJo Parker Dunedin Blue Jays - A SS On Tuesday, Parker was just 1-for-5, but the one hit was his first professional home run. Explore JoJo Parker News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now