Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
Cecil and Osuna are borderline elite, and Loup and Sanchez are pretty good too. There's nothing wrong with the pen.

 

Oh god, no. NOUU!! Please trade Sanchez instead of keeping him in the pen. Milk that "potential" for someone good from another team. Like Arizona for Anderson!!

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I think I could live with a pen of Osuna, Cecil, Loup, Sanchez and 3 of Schultz, Delabar, Girodo, Rowen. I think you throw a minor league deal at Axford or Feliz. Hopefully get someone like Cahill or Alvarez for rotation/pen depth.

 

I also think Dragmire is a bull pen dark horse candidate.

 

I think the money you want to spend on Sipp is better spent on Henderson Alvarez or even a Mat Latos/Trevor Cahill reclamation project.

Posted
I would, in fact, be surprised if this happened. Quite surprised.

 

Very surprised. I can't see Shapiro/Atkins being comfortable with the package it would cost for Fernandez. It would probably be something like Osuna, Pompey, Travis, and Pillar.

Posted
Very surprised. I can't see Shapiro/Atkins being comfortable with the package it would cost for Fernandez. It would probably be something like Osuna, Pompey, Travis, and Pillar.

 

Probably starts with Stroman.

Posted
Zips hates the Jays SP even more. Though Stroman apparently is really low because of the projected playing time. Funny that Donaldson almost projects to have as much WAR as the entire rotation.

 

 

Greeaatt..... We'll see if our "more than adequate" SP holds up through the season.

Posted
Greeaatt..... We'll see if our "more than adequate" SP holds up through the season.

 

All those rotation WAR totals will be beaten, I'd wager.

Community Moderator
Posted

Ugh, missing on Bud Norris for $2.5 and Cahill for $4.25 is extremely annoying.

 

Both in the same realm of talent as Chavez. Cost less in terms of $. Cost nothing in terms of Hendrickses.

 

I mean in a nutshell I'd prefer Chavez over either of them. Would have been nice to add Cahill as the #7 though.

Posted
Cahill is going to be a starter for them, no? I don't think he'd have a shot here as a starter

 

"ESPN Chicago’s Jesse Rogers adds that while Cahill is definitely in the bullpen for now"

Community Moderator
Posted
Cahill is going to be a starter for them, no? I don't think he'd have a shot here as a starter

 

He arguably has less of a shot there. #6 on their depth chart but the top 5 are all really strong.

Posted
Sipp for 3/15 would be nice

 

Yeh I agree. Pen needs another top line LHP. If Loup doesn't get his sh-t together he will find himself on another team.

Cecil cant pitch every game as the lone reliable lefty out of the pen.

Posted
Ugh, missing on Bud Norris for $2.5 and Cahill for $4.25 is extremely annoying.

 

Both in the same realm of talent as Chavez. Cost less in terms of $. Cost nothing in terms of Hendrickses.

 

I mean in a nutshell I'd prefer Chavez over either of them. Would have been nice to add Cahill as the #7 though.

 

Agree. That was my biggest issue with the trade. Rather just overpay one of those other arms to be fit the same role.

Posted

Ken Rosenthal ‏@Ken_Rosenthal 3m3 minutes ago

Source: #Mariners making progress on trade for #RedSox’s Miley.

66 retweets 22 likes

Reply Retweet 66

Like 22

More

Posted
Agree. That was my biggest issue with the trade. Rather just overpay one of those other arms to be fit the same role.

 

There's that and the fact that good relievers are signing for huge amounts. Hendriks could have been a steal on his contract. All he needed was some trust from the manager.

Community Moderator
Posted
There's that and the fact that good relievers are signing for huge amounts. Hendriks could have been a steal on his contract. All he needed was some trust from the manager.

 

Toronto looks to have taken a very passive, low-key approach to the SP market, but that's not really the case.

 

They obviously took an educated guess at what the market would be, saw a boom coming, and decided to act swiftly at the start of free agency. So it was an aggressive approach - they acted fast and locked up Estrada, traded for Chavez and inked Happ all before the market was even set.

 

In being aggressive in this sense they accepted some risks. One risk was they they were overestimating how much it would take financially to sign one of the "swing-man" free agents like Norris or Cahill.

 

It seems like this might have happened... but the net benefit of the entire approach, if Happ and Estrada are sub-market deals, could still be there.

 

I think it's always important to look at the big picture because transactions never happen in a nutshell.

Posted
Toronto looks to have taken a very passive, low-key approach to the SP market, but that's not really the case.

 

They obviously took an educated guess at what the market would be, saw a boom coming, and decided to act swiftly at the start of free agency. So it was an aggressive approach - they acted fast and locked up Estrada, traded for Chavez and inked Happ all before the market was even set.

 

In being aggressive in this sense they accepted some risks. One risk was they they were overestimating how much it would take financially to sign one of the "swing-man" free agents like Norris or Cahill.

 

It seems like this might have happened... but the net benefit of the entire approach, if Happ and Estrada are sub-market deals, could still be there.

 

I think it's always important to look at the big picture because transactions never happen in a nutshell.

 

Yeah I agree with all this. I don't love the Chavez trade in isolation but there's still a chance that they can find a cheap replacement for Hendriks which would balance out the overpayment for Chavez. If they gambled that it would be easier to find a Hendriks replacement then a guy like Chavez, I can't really fault that logic.

Posted
Toronto looks to have taken a very passive, low-key approach to the SP market, but that's not really the case.

 

They obviously took an educated guess at what the market would be, saw a boom coming, and decided to act swiftly at the start of free agency. So it was an aggressive approach - they acted fast and locked up Estrada, traded for Chavez and inked Happ all before the market was even set.

 

In being aggressive in this sense they accepted some risks. One risk was they they were overestimating how much it would take financially to sign one of the "swing-man" free agents like Norris or Cahill.

 

It seems like this might have happened... but the net benefit of the entire approach, if Happ and Estrada are sub-market deals, could still be there.

 

I think it's always important to look at the big picture because transactions never happen in a nutshell.

 

Norris signed so cheaply because they gave him a rotation spot i believe. Cahill is ok but i'd rather have Chavez for 2 years. I doubt he takes the same money from the Jays.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...