baubau Verified Member Posted December 7, 2015 Posted December 7, 2015 Cecil and Osuna are borderline elite, and Loup and Sanchez are pretty good too. There's nothing wrong with the pen. Oh god, no. NOUU!! Please trade Sanchez instead of keeping him in the pen. Milk that "potential" for someone good from another team. Like Arizona for Anderson!!
Stangstag Old-Timey Member Posted December 7, 2015 Posted December 7, 2015 Sipp for 3/15 would be nice
HERPDERP Old-Timey Member Posted December 7, 2015 Posted December 7, 2015 Mariners-Red Sox talking starters - per kenny
Nafro Verified Member Posted December 7, 2015 Posted December 7, 2015 I think I could live with a pen of Osuna, Cecil, Loup, Sanchez and 3 of Schultz, Delabar, Girodo, Rowen. I think you throw a minor league deal at Axford or Feliz. Hopefully get someone like Cahill or Alvarez for rotation/pen depth. I also think Dragmire is a bull pen dark horse candidate. I think the money you want to spend on Sipp is better spent on Henderson Alvarez or even a Mat Latos/Trevor Cahill reclamation project.
THANOS Old-Timey Member Posted December 7, 2015 Posted December 7, 2015 I would, in fact, be surprised if this happened. Quite surprised. Very surprised. I can't see Shapiro/Atkins being comfortable with the package it would cost for Fernandez. It would probably be something like Osuna, Pompey, Travis, and Pillar.
baubau Verified Member Posted December 7, 2015 Posted December 7, 2015 Very surprised. I can't see Shapiro/Atkins being comfortable with the package it would cost for Fernandez. It would probably be something like Osuna, Pompey, Travis, and Pillar. Probably starts with Stroman.
Nafro Verified Member Posted December 7, 2015 Posted December 7, 2015 They asked Dodgers for Urias and Seager. It would have to start with Stroman.
BTS Community Moderator Posted December 7, 2015 Posted December 7, 2015 Cahill re-signs with the Cubs.
JaysRap Verified Member Posted December 7, 2015 Posted December 7, 2015 Zips hates the Jays SP even more. Though Stroman apparently is really low because of the projected playing time. Funny that Donaldson almost projects to have as much WAR as the entire rotation. Greeaatt..... We'll see if our "more than adequate" SP holds up through the season.
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted December 7, 2015 Posted December 7, 2015 Greeaatt..... We'll see if our "more than adequate" SP holds up through the season. All those rotation WAR totals will be beaten, I'd wager.
Cyborg Verified Member Posted December 7, 2015 Posted December 7, 2015 All those rotation WAR totals will be beaten, I'd wager. The IP are just all low.
burlingtonbandit Old-Timey Member Posted December 7, 2015 Posted December 7, 2015 Lowe got 6.5 Million a year from Tigers apparently.
burlingtonbandit Old-Timey Member Posted December 7, 2015 Posted December 7, 2015 Red Sox seem to really want to trade Miley or Bucholz. I'd love Miley in Toronto but it'd be tough making any trade with the Red Sox.
HERPDERP Old-Timey Member Posted December 7, 2015 Posted December 7, 2015 Computer thief was amazing last year! what is he thinking.
Grant77 Old-Timey Member Posted December 7, 2015 Posted December 7, 2015 Cahill re-signs with the Cubs. I would have paid Cahill that amount.
Grant77 Old-Timey Member Posted December 7, 2015 Posted December 7, 2015 All those rotation WAR totals will be beaten, I'd wager. I'll take that bet.
Laika Community Moderator Posted December 7, 2015 Posted December 7, 2015 Ugh, missing on Bud Norris for $2.5 and Cahill for $4.25 is extremely annoying. Both in the same realm of talent as Chavez. Cost less in terms of $. Cost nothing in terms of Hendrickses. I mean in a nutshell I'd prefer Chavez over either of them. Would have been nice to add Cahill as the #7 though.
HERPDERP Old-Timey Member Posted December 7, 2015 Posted December 7, 2015 Cahill is going to be a starter for them, no? I don't think he'd have a shot here as a starter
reedjohnsonfan Verified Member Posted December 7, 2015 Posted December 7, 2015 Cahill is going to be a starter for them, no? I don't think he'd have a shot here as a starter "ESPN Chicago’s Jesse Rogers adds that while Cahill is definitely in the bullpen for now"
reedjohnsonfan Verified Member Posted December 7, 2015 Posted December 7, 2015 I would have paid Cahill that amount. Me too, guy has one of the best sinkers... when he can control it. Lots of upside still.
Laika Community Moderator Posted December 7, 2015 Posted December 7, 2015 Cahill is going to be a starter for them, no? I don't think he'd have a shot here as a starter He arguably has less of a shot there. #6 on their depth chart but the top 5 are all really strong.
Maico450 Verified Member Posted December 7, 2015 Posted December 7, 2015 Sipp for 3/15 would be nice Yeh I agree. Pen needs another top line LHP. If Loup doesn't get his sh-t together he will find himself on another team. Cecil cant pitch every game as the lone reliable lefty out of the pen.
burlingtonbandit Old-Timey Member Posted December 7, 2015 Posted December 7, 2015 Ugh, missing on Bud Norris for $2.5 and Cahill for $4.25 is extremely annoying. Both in the same realm of talent as Chavez. Cost less in terms of $. Cost nothing in terms of Hendrickses. I mean in a nutshell I'd prefer Chavez over either of them. Would have been nice to add Cahill as the #7 though. Agree. That was my biggest issue with the trade. Rather just overpay one of those other arms to be fit the same role.
HERPDERP Old-Timey Member Posted December 7, 2015 Posted December 7, 2015 Ken Rosenthal @Ken_Rosenthal 3m3 minutes ago Source: #Mariners making progress on trade for #RedSox’s Miley. 66 retweets 22 likes Reply Retweet 66 Like 22 More
KingKat Old-Timey Member Posted December 7, 2015 Posted December 7, 2015 Agree. That was my biggest issue with the trade. Rather just overpay one of those other arms to be fit the same role. There's that and the fact that good relievers are signing for huge amounts. Hendriks could have been a steal on his contract. All he needed was some trust from the manager.
Laika Community Moderator Posted December 7, 2015 Posted December 7, 2015 There's that and the fact that good relievers are signing for huge amounts. Hendriks could have been a steal on his contract. All he needed was some trust from the manager. Toronto looks to have taken a very passive, low-key approach to the SP market, but that's not really the case. They obviously took an educated guess at what the market would be, saw a boom coming, and decided to act swiftly at the start of free agency. So it was an aggressive approach - they acted fast and locked up Estrada, traded for Chavez and inked Happ all before the market was even set. In being aggressive in this sense they accepted some risks. One risk was they they were overestimating how much it would take financially to sign one of the "swing-man" free agents like Norris or Cahill. It seems like this might have happened... but the net benefit of the entire approach, if Happ and Estrada are sub-market deals, could still be there. I think it's always important to look at the big picture because transactions never happen in a nutshell.
KingKat Old-Timey Member Posted December 7, 2015 Posted December 7, 2015 Toronto looks to have taken a very passive, low-key approach to the SP market, but that's not really the case. They obviously took an educated guess at what the market would be, saw a boom coming, and decided to act swiftly at the start of free agency. So it was an aggressive approach - they acted fast and locked up Estrada, traded for Chavez and inked Happ all before the market was even set. In being aggressive in this sense they accepted some risks. One risk was they they were overestimating how much it would take financially to sign one of the "swing-man" free agents like Norris or Cahill. It seems like this might have happened... but the net benefit of the entire approach, if Happ and Estrada are sub-market deals, could still be there. I think it's always important to look at the big picture because transactions never happen in a nutshell. Yeah I agree with all this. I don't love the Chavez trade in isolation but there's still a chance that they can find a cheap replacement for Hendriks which would balance out the overpayment for Chavez. If they gambled that it would be easier to find a Hendriks replacement then a guy like Chavez, I can't really fault that logic.
Frenchsoup Verified Member Posted December 7, 2015 Posted December 7, 2015 Toronto looks to have taken a very passive, low-key approach to the SP market, but that's not really the case. They obviously took an educated guess at what the market would be, saw a boom coming, and decided to act swiftly at the start of free agency. So it was an aggressive approach - they acted fast and locked up Estrada, traded for Chavez and inked Happ all before the market was even set. In being aggressive in this sense they accepted some risks. One risk was they they were overestimating how much it would take financially to sign one of the "swing-man" free agents like Norris or Cahill. It seems like this might have happened... but the net benefit of the entire approach, if Happ and Estrada are sub-market deals, could still be there. I think it's always important to look at the big picture because transactions never happen in a nutshell. Norris signed so cheaply because they gave him a rotation spot i believe. Cahill is ok but i'd rather have Chavez for 2 years. I doubt he takes the same money from the Jays.
JoJo Parker Dunedin Blue Jays - A SS On Tuesday, Parker was just 1-for-5, but the one hit was his first professional home run. Explore JoJo Parker News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now