Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

How would you rate the new front office's offseason thus far  

54 members have voted

  1. 1. How would you rate the new front office's offseason thus far

    • Great!
      5
    • Still early, but good so far
      20
    • Still early, but disappointing so far
      18
    • Terrible
      11


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
I'm not crazy about the deals done thus far but it's far too early to judge his offseason. To me, a GM should be in place by now and when he finishes it better not be Lacava.
Posted (edited)
Lol, he's been on the job 32 days now. He hasn't even learned everyone's name yet. This thread takes ridiculous to a whole new level. We haven't even had his first Winter Meetings. If you had your way we wouldn't have any salary room for players...it would all be spent on our executive of the month hiring policy. Edited by Nafro
I found another point to make this thread look moronic
Posted
With this ideology Dayton Moore should lose his job. KC has done nothing this off-season.
Posted
Have you banned anyone yet?

 

Just obvious spambots for the most part. Honestly, by the time I get Emails about reported posts they're usually handled. Again, I have been very clear about being light with the banhammer since my election...

Posted
Just obvious spambots for the most part. Honestly, by the time I get Emails about reported posts they're usually handled. Again, I have been very clear about being light with the banhammer since my election...

 

Wow you certainly quick to tally DP is right counter.

Posted
Would've preferred Justin Morneau over the return of Smoak.

 

I never thought of that. I certainly would have loved a one year flyer on Justin Mourneau at 6-8 million, instead of Smoak.

Community Moderator
Posted
Meh. Morneau has a 104 wRC+ over 2200 PA in his last five seasons. Projected at 107, which is what Smoak did in 2015.
Posted
Meh. Morneau has a 104 wRC+ over 2200 PA in his last five seasons. Projected at 107, which is what Smoak did in 2015.

 

Touche...I will admit that it was personal sentiment over useful facts like that.

 

I would hope we take a flyer on Henderson Alvarez though!

Posted
Just obvious spambots for the most part. Honestly, by the time I get Emails about reported posts they're usually handled. Again, I have been very clear about being light with the banhammer since my election...

 

Even though we were explicitly warned not to do this, I perma banned a bunch of people during the playoffs without even realizing I was doing it.

Posted
Even though we were explicitly warned not to do this, I perma banned a bunch of people during the playoffs without even realizing I was doing it.

 

Don't worry I'm sure he's back.

Posted
Even though we were explicitly warned not to do this, I perma banned a bunch of people during the playoffs without even realizing I was doing it.

 

it happens.

Posted
Even though we were explicitly warned not to do this, I perma banned a bunch of people during the playoffs without even realizing I was doing it.

 

lol how does that happen?

Posted
Note that permabanning is different from using spam-o-matic. There's no harm in using the modcp permaban function. You can always change it and the account doesn't go anywhere. If there's a duplicate account or something, you can really use either. For legitimate users, a non-permanent ban.

 

I find the whole interface klunky as hell but maybe I just don't understand it well enough. Also, this conversation should probably be going on in the hot tub but perhaps regular posters are entertained by our shop talk. It uh... humanizes us or whatever.

Community Moderator
Posted
I find the whole interface klunky as hell but maybe I just don't understand it well enough. Also, this conversation should probably be going on in the hot tub but perhaps regular posters are entertained by our shop talk. It uh... humanizes us or whatever.

 

You guys call your mod circle jerk the hot tub?

Posted
Note that permabanning is different from using spam-o-matic. There's no harm in using the modcp permaban function. You can always change it and the account doesn't go anywhere. If there's a duplicate account or something, you can really use either. For legitimate users, a non-permanent ban.

 

if you've marked a post and just deleted ít and then try to spamomatic another poster that needs to be removed, you can end up with both posts being carried over and both getting perma banned. sometimes the system doesn't reset after you've dealt with a post. you have to make sure that it says you are dealing with 1 post,

Posted
if you've marked a post and just deleted ít and then try to spamomatic another poster that needs to be removed, you can end up with both posts being carried over and both getting perma banned. sometimes the system doesn't reset after you've dealt with a post. you have to make sure that it says you are dealing with 1 post,

 

Either there's a trick I don't know or the whole process for banning people is just ridiculously convoluted. I wish you could just click on someone's name and ban them already.

Posted
This is fascinating. Someone provide pictures next.

 

http://onlineathens.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/full/14142151.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...