o2cui2i Community Moderator Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 44 days 18 hours and 19 minutes until spring training...... way too long
GD Old-Timey Member Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 Khris Davis of the Brewers will reportedly be dealt. Interesting target.
Grant77 Old-Timey Member Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 i can't decide which is worse: 1) Stro for Miller 2) d'Arnaud and Thor for Dickey Thor is more valuable than Stro and Miller combined.
Stangstag Old-Timey Member Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 Thor is more valuable than Stro and Miller combined. I would argue that. Stro and Synd are pretty even, Synd is probably worth a bit more than Stro.
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 I would argue that. Stro and Synd are pretty even, Synd is probably worth a bit more than Stro. Syndergaard is a much better pitcher than Stroman. How can you argue that they are even?
Olerud363 Old-Timey Member Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 Syndergaard is a much better pitcher than Stroman. How can you argue that they are even? According to fangraphs Syndergard has been worth 3.1 WAR in 150 innings, Stroman 3.5 WAR in 157 innings. Syndergard is projected for 4.1 WAR next year, Stroman for 3.4. I can't imagine two players being any closer statistically... That's why one would argue they are even. Stuff wise, build, there may be differences. You could argue that Syndergaard is much, much likelier to hold up... though steamer doesn't think there is much difference near term. Not sure if height is part of steamer. Stroman is 1 year 4 months older... but he made his debute at almost exactly the same age as Syndergard, rooky seasons were very close. The argument for Syndergard is health... which is fair. Performance wise they are very close, even minor league numbers are close.
Olerud363 Old-Timey Member Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 Rooky?? Have no idea if this comment is directed to me.... If Stroman looked like Roy Halladay (not just pitched like him circa 2001-2007) nobody would blink when you compared him to Syndergaard. So the "you crazy, Syndergaard way, way better" comments are probably based on Syndergard's size and body type... which may be sound reasoning. I don't know.
KingKat Old-Timey Member Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 Rooky?? Have no idea if this comment is directed to me.... It's just a comment on your spelling. It's rookie.
Olerud363 Old-Timey Member Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 It's just a comment on your spelling. It's rookie. Fair enough... I suck at spelling and grammar.... I am sure there is a circuit missing... I did the SATs in highschool and got a pretty lopsided score... 750 550 or something.
HERPDERP Old-Timey Member Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 I'll take Thor over Stroman simply due to the body difference (I know). I'm more comfortable with Thor throwing 200 innings in a season than Stroman. I think the former would last longer.
BigBounceyBlueBalls Old-Timey Member Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 So the Angels have needs in LF and at 2b hmmmmm! Would Revere and Travis be acceptable for Skaggs and Cj Wilson ? Or for just Skaggs would Revere/Goins package work? Discuss!
burlingtonbandit Old-Timey Member Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 So the Angels have needs in LF and at 2b hmmmmm! Would Revere and Travis be acceptable for Skaggs and Cj Wilson ? Or for just Skaggs would Revere/Goins package work? Discuss! That first proposal is gross. I would easily do the 2nd proposal but I don't think the Angels would.
GD Old-Timey Member Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 That first proposal is gross. I would easily do the 2nd proposal but I don't think the Angels would. lol
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 That's the first time I've ever seen BBBB make a somewhat realistic trade proposal.
TheHurl Site Manager Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 That's the first time I've ever seen BBBB make a somewhat realistic trade proposal. He's on path to be a future Barney. He just needs to join Greenwood's Special Fantasy Olympics league.
Laika Community Moderator Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 I'll take Thor over Stroman simply due to the body difference (I know). I'm more comfortable with Thor throwing 200 innings in a season than Stroman. I think the former would last longer. I think Stroman has a slightly cleaner and generally more athletic delivery. The injury risk that comes with being short is probably overrated and possibly non-existent. I mean, shorter guys might have to use more effort and dirtier mechanics in order to throw hard, which could cause injury, but that's a different primary cause.
Dr. Dinger Old-Timey Member Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 I think Stroman has a slightly cleaner and generally more athletic delivery. The injury risk that comes with being short is probably overrated and possibly non-existent. I mean, shorter guys might have to use more effort and dirtier mechanics in order to throw hard, which could cause injury, but that's a different primary cause. I'm going to totally throw out injury risk since they've both been very healthy so far. Syndergaard has a lot more velo and Ks. I like Stroman a lot, but 5 years from now when they both start slipping in velo, I'd rather have Syndergaard.
Laika Community Moderator Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 I'm going to totally throw out injury risk since they've both been very healthy so far. Syndergaard has a lot more velo and Ks. I like Stroman a lot, but 5 years from now when they both start slipping in velo, I'd rather have Syndergaard. Stroman has more pitchability, better command/control (better balance through his delivery too), and more tricks in his bag of pitches. He also has a work ethic and personality that rises above anyone else's. There are some things on his side too, in terms of aging gracefully. We'll see.
HERPDERP Old-Timey Member Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 I think Stroman has a slightly cleaner and generally more athletic delivery. The injury risk that comes with being short is probably overrated and possibly non-existent. I mean, shorter guys might have to use more effort and dirtier mechanics in order to throw hard, which could cause injury, but that's a different primary cause. I was going to talk about being able to survive the rigors of a full season (and not so much about injury), but then I read a sabr article that pretty much s*** on my face http://sabr.org/research/does-pitcher-s-height-matter tldr: Height doesn't matter.
P2F Old-Timey Member Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 I was going to talk about being able to survive the rigors of a full season (and not so much about injury), but then I read a sabr article that pretty much s*** on my face http://sabr.org/research/does-pitcher-s-height-matter tldr: Height doesn't matter. I remember reading that article a few years ago. It's a great read.
BigBounceyBlueBalls Old-Timey Member Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 He's on path to be a future Barney. He just needs to join Greenwood's Special Fantasy Olympics league. It might be too simple in concept to be a proving ground for the bigs, I get bored easy! One year leagues don't prove much of worth to the established leagues or do they?
CHRIS Verified Member Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 I'm going to totally throw out injury risk since they've both been very healthy so far. Syndergaard has a lot more velo and Ks. I like Stroman a lot, but 5 years from now when they both start slipping in velo, I'd rather have Syndergaard. I think I would almost pick the opposite. I feel like Stroman with the number of pitches he throws could get further with reduced velocity than Syndergaard. That said, I wish we had both of them.
King Old-Timey Member Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 It might be too simple in concept to be a proving ground for the bigs, I get bored easy! One year leagues don't prove much of worth to the established leagues or do they? Gotta start somewhere, Big B.
King Old-Timey Member Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 Live baseball, good quality --> http://streaming.lidom.com/
Effit Old-Timey Member Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 i was going to talk about being able to survive the rigors of a full season (and not so much about injury), but then i read a sabr article that pretty much s*** on my face http://sabr.org/research/does-pitcher-s-height-matter tldr: Height doesn't matter. HDMH! cf
BigBounceyBlueBalls Old-Timey Member Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 That first proposal is gross. I would easily do the 2nd proposal but I don't think the Angels would. Gross How? Can do add some thought and maybe some words to explain why? Thanks
BigBounceyBlueBalls Old-Timey Member Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 Gotta start somewhere, Big B. You have been watching to many after school movies. Happy New Year! Lol
GD Old-Timey Member Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 Dan Haren lmfao http://www.si.com/extra-mustard/2016/01/04/dan-haren-twitter-chicago-cubs-random-stories
Grant77 Old-Timey Member Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 I think Stroman has a slightly cleaner and generally more athletic delivery. The injury risk that comes with being short is probably overrated and possibly non-existent. I mean, shorter guys might have to use more effort and dirtier mechanics in order to throw hard, which could cause injury, but that's a different primary cause. I can't completely dismiss the fact that no pitcher as short as Stroman has ever had sustained success as a starter. There have been plenty of pitchers that short, but they all end up in the bullpen or get hurt. I'm not going to pretend to know the exact reason, but I don't make a habit of betting on guys to be the only exception over a 100+ year period.
JoJo Parker Dunedin Blue Jays - A SS On Tuesday, Parker was just 1-for-5, but the one hit was his first professional home run. Explore JoJo Parker News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now