Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

d'Arnaud or Navarro, who would you rather have for this season?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Travis d’Arnaud-

93 GP .243/.306/.412 wRC+106 WAR 1.5 (1.7 OFF, 0.7 DEF)

 

Dioner Navarro

123 GP .280/.322/.407 wRC+102 WAR 1.9 (-1.9OFF, 4.7 DEF)

 

d’Arnaud is tied for the lead league in PB with 12 which accounts in large part for his low defensive WAR numbers.

 

However he is known for being a great framer which is not included in the WAR calculation while we all know what kind of framer Navarro is and the framing statistics lean much in the favor of d’Arnaud. He has +82 calls for the season and an RAA of 10.9 while Navarro has -121 calls (1.36 per game) and a RAA of -16.1 which is good for fourth last in the MLB.

 

Who would you rather of had for this year? Notwithstanding framing, they have had a very similar season according to the advanced stats. But with framing included, I think it’s safe to say d’Arnaud is the better player for the year.

Posted
Its an easy call for the future, but somewhat debatable when looking at just this years stats exclusively and not including salary.
Posted
Travis d’Arnaud-

93 GP .243/.306/.412 wRC+106 WAR 1.5 (1.7 OFF, 0.7 DEF)

 

Dioner Navarro

123 GP .280/.322/.407 wRC+102 WAR 1.9 (-1.9OFF, 4.7 DEF)

 

d’Arnaud is tied for the lead league in PB with 12 which accounts in large part for his low defensive WAR numbers.

 

However he is known for being a great framer which is not included in the WAR calculation while we all know what kind of framer Navarro is and the framing statistics lean much in the favor of d’Arnaud. He has +82 calls for the season and an RAA of 10.9 while Navarro has -121 calls (1.36 per game) and a RAA of -16.1 which is good for fourth last in the MLB.

 

Who would you rather of had for this year? Notwithstanding framing, they have had a very similar season according to the advanced stats. But with framing included, I think it’s safe to say d’Arnaud is the better player for the year.

 

I think you answered your own question. Also....Travis made less $$.

Posted
Its an easy call for the future, but somewhat debatable when looking at just this years stats exclusively and not including salary.

 

no it isn't, factor in framing and the fact that he played less games. Its not close

Posted
no it isn't, factor in framing and the fact that he played less games. Its not close

 

He did say "I think it’s safe to say d’Arnaud is the better player for the year." to be fair.

Posted
He did say "I think it’s safe to say d’Arnaud is the better player for the year." to be fair.

 

Its an easy call for the future, but somewhat debatable when looking at just this years stats exclusively and not including salary.

 

then that, not debatable

Posted
Disregarding the familiarity contempt and grass is greener stuff, TDA has been pretty easily better even this year.
Posted

The word in New York is that Travis is unlikely to stick at catcher and they are considering a move to LF due to his history of concussions. His numbers as a left fielder if they do move him to LF would have to see an adjustment. How good is his offense if LF becomes his position?

 

Navarro is a guy you'd like as a solid back up catcher. Trouble is the Jays have a lot of guys who are good back up type players - unfortunately we have them as regulars. And no soup (err playoffs) for us as a result.

Posted
If you are going to ask a dumb question like this in which you answered it yourself, why not put it in the Around Baseball Thread?

 

I don't think a new thread has been posted all day. And the the last 2 threads have been reyes 16 errors.. and melk man wants to stay in Toronto but in reality he just had a standard response... Sometimes threads are not mind blowing interesting or detail new information, who cares.

 

The fact that d'Arnaud was traded by the jays and how his numbers were so close to Navarro's notwithstanding framing I felt it warranted a thread.

Posted
I don't think a new thread has been posted all day. And the the last 2 threads have been reyes 16 errors.. and melk man wants to stay in Toronto but in reality he just had a standard response... Sometimes threads are not mind blowing interesting or detail new information, who cares.

 

The fact that d'Arnaud was traded by the jays and how his numbers were so close to Navarro's notwithstanding framing I felt it warranted a thread.

 

It's all good man. As you said, Travis has easily been the better player. If you had posted the same post on the old forum it probably would have created a lot of discussion.

Posted
If you had posted the same post on the old forum it probably would have created a lot of discussion. lol At least your criticism is subtle.
Posted
If you had posted the same post on the old forum it probably would have created a lot of discussion. lol At least your criticism is subtle.

 

It was a shot at the old forum. Not you.

Posted
At 3m Navarro's salary not really a factor. TDA is also injury prone and playing on turf would likely be a problem. As happens often here. Surprised to see TDA hit 13HR in little over half a season though.
Posted

Navarro. d'Arnaud's likely headed for the OF once Plawecki reaches the majors to protect him from concussions, negating any value he had at C.

 

d'Arnaud if you regard pitch framing.. but his value is hurt by the 12 PB caused by trying to frame pitches for strikes. A -0.8dWAR doesn't help.

 

By WAR, Navarro wins with a 2.0 WAR (2.1 oWAR, 0.4 dWAR) over d'Arnaud's 0.4 WAR (1.9 oWAR, -0.8dWAR) Just because the catcher is a good pitch framer doesn't mean he's good.. look at JP Arencibia. They have to at least hit a little bit and not kill the team with frequent K's and PBs.

Posted
Where did you get those WAR stats, they seem to reflect the players results better. I was using Fangraphs columns of OFF and DEF before the final column of WAR.
Posted

d`Arnaud is garbage. Navarro on the other hand can be an everyday player as a serviceable DH and 2nd catcher.

 

The Jays need Russell Martin BAD!

Posted

All the money needs to be put to starting pitchers as close to number 1s as is humanly possible. And land a full time 2B.

 

Navarro is "good enough" to win with if you don't have huge gaping holes at other key positions. A solid catcher a solid second baseman - don;t have to be all stars - average defense and average bat is fine if you have a Roy Halladay, Roger Clemense, Randy Johnson, Greg Maddux in their prime on the mound. On good days those guys could win with a little league team behind them. When you give up 8 runs a LOT then blaming the catcher's pitch framing or Reyes who averages 1 error every 15 games is placing blame where it doesn't much matter. We have no top of the rotation starters.

Posted
You guys are all f***ing retarded if you would rather have d'Arnaud over Navarro this year. For the future, I would obviously choose d'Arnaud BUT I don't think he will stick as a catcher.
Posted
Where did you get those WAR stats, they seem to reflect the players results better. I was using Fangraphs columns of OFF and DEF before the final column of WAR.

 

Baseball Reference.

Posted
LoL @ you for doing that on purpose.

 

Lol @ you covering your ass and now trying to make this a discussion at 11:41 PM

Lol @ you

Lol @ #Lovethisforum

Lol @ life

it's time for bed

Posted
This piece in the Wall Street Journal isn't exactly saying good things about d'Arnaud's defense.. he should focus on catching the ball and not just framing.

 

http://online.wsj.com/articles/n-y-mets-defense-a-flaw-in-travis-darnauds-game-1409790675

 

Sure, it helps the pitchers get strikes, but the PBs can really hurt with runners on base.

 

3 Strikes that are actually balls with a runner on base is better than 1 PB that allows a runner to advance a base. There are stats that tell you what is more valuable btw...So you can save your time instead of looking for stories about PB on WSJ

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...