immature Verified Member Posted September 6, 2014 Posted September 6, 2014 Travis d’Arnaud- 93 GP .243/.306/.412 wRC+106 WAR 1.5 (1.7 OFF, 0.7 DEF) Dioner Navarro 123 GP .280/.322/.407 wRC+102 WAR 1.9 (-1.9OFF, 4.7 DEF) d’Arnaud is tied for the lead league in PB with 12 which accounts in large part for his low defensive WAR numbers. However he is known for being a great framer which is not included in the WAR calculation while we all know what kind of framer Navarro is and the framing statistics lean much in the favor of d’Arnaud. He has +82 calls for the season and an RAA of 10.9 while Navarro has -121 calls (1.36 per game) and a RAA of -16.1 which is good for fourth last in the MLB. Who would you rather of had for this year? Notwithstanding framing, they have had a very similar season according to the advanced stats. But with framing included, I think it’s safe to say d’Arnaud is the better player for the year.
eastcoastjaysfan Old-Timey Member Posted September 6, 2014 Posted September 6, 2014 High upside, young, cost controlled catcher vs fat, useless defensive catcher who has tricked the casuals into thinking he's good because of dem rbi'z. Tough call.
immature Verified Member Posted September 6, 2014 Author Posted September 6, 2014 Its an easy call for the future, but somewhat debatable when looking at just this years stats exclusively and not including salary.
jays4life19 Old-Timey Member Posted September 6, 2014 Posted September 6, 2014 Travis d’Arnaud- 93 GP .243/.306/.412 wRC+106 WAR 1.5 (1.7 OFF, 0.7 DEF) Dioner Navarro 123 GP .280/.322/.407 wRC+102 WAR 1.9 (-1.9OFF, 4.7 DEF) d’Arnaud is tied for the lead league in PB with 12 which accounts in large part for his low defensive WAR numbers. However he is known for being a great framer which is not included in the WAR calculation while we all know what kind of framer Navarro is and the framing statistics lean much in the favor of d’Arnaud. He has +82 calls for the season and an RAA of 10.9 while Navarro has -121 calls (1.36 per game) and a RAA of -16.1 which is good for fourth last in the MLB. Who would you rather of had for this year? Notwithstanding framing, they have had a very similar season according to the advanced stats. But with framing included, I think it’s safe to say d’Arnaud is the better player for the year. I think you answered your own question. Also....Travis made less $$.
Atothe Old-Timey Member Posted September 6, 2014 Posted September 6, 2014 Its an easy call for the future, but somewhat debatable when looking at just this years stats exclusively and not including salary. no it isn't, factor in framing and the fact that he played less games. Its not close
jays4life19 Old-Timey Member Posted September 6, 2014 Posted September 6, 2014 no it isn't, factor in framing and the fact that he played less games. Its not close He did say "I think it’s safe to say d’Arnaud is the better player for the year." to be fair.
Atothe Old-Timey Member Posted September 6, 2014 Posted September 6, 2014 He did say "I think it’s safe to say d’Arnaud is the better player for the year." to be fair. Its an easy call for the future, but somewhat debatable when looking at just this years stats exclusively and not including salary. then that, not debatable
GD Old-Timey Member Posted September 6, 2014 Posted September 6, 2014 Disregarding the familiarity contempt and grass is greener stuff, TDA has been pretty easily better even this year.
burlingtonbandit Old-Timey Member Posted September 7, 2014 Posted September 7, 2014 If you are going to ask a dumb question like this in which you answered it yourself, why not put it in the Around Baseball Thread?
Key22 Verified Member Posted September 7, 2014 Posted September 7, 2014 The word in New York is that Travis is unlikely to stick at catcher and they are considering a move to LF due to his history of concussions. His numbers as a left fielder if they do move him to LF would have to see an adjustment. How good is his offense if LF becomes his position? Navarro is a guy you'd like as a solid back up catcher. Trouble is the Jays have a lot of guys who are good back up type players - unfortunately we have them as regulars. And no soup (err playoffs) for us as a result.
immature Verified Member Posted September 7, 2014 Author Posted September 7, 2014 If you are going to ask a dumb question like this in which you answered it yourself, why not put it in the Around Baseball Thread? I don't think a new thread has been posted all day. And the the last 2 threads have been reyes 16 errors.. and melk man wants to stay in Toronto but in reality he just had a standard response... Sometimes threads are not mind blowing interesting or detail new information, who cares. The fact that d'Arnaud was traded by the jays and how his numbers were so close to Navarro's notwithstanding framing I felt it warranted a thread.
jays4life19 Old-Timey Member Posted September 7, 2014 Posted September 7, 2014 I don't think a new thread has been posted all day. And the the last 2 threads have been reyes 16 errors.. and melk man wants to stay in Toronto but in reality he just had a standard response... Sometimes threads are not mind blowing interesting or detail new information, who cares. The fact that d'Arnaud was traded by the jays and how his numbers were so close to Navarro's notwithstanding framing I felt it warranted a thread. It's all good man. As you said, Travis has easily been the better player. If you had posted the same post on the old forum it probably would have created a lot of discussion.
immature Verified Member Posted September 7, 2014 Author Posted September 7, 2014 If you had posted the same post on the old forum it probably would have created a lot of discussion. lol At least your criticism is subtle.
jays4life19 Old-Timey Member Posted September 7, 2014 Posted September 7, 2014 If you had posted the same post on the old forum it probably would have created a lot of discussion. lol At least your criticism is subtle. It was a shot at the old forum. Not you.
GNick49 Verified Member Posted September 7, 2014 Posted September 7, 2014 At 3m Navarro's salary not really a factor. TDA is also injury prone and playing on turf would likely be a problem. As happens often here. Surprised to see TDA hit 13HR in little over half a season though.
jaysfan2014 Old-Timey Member Posted September 7, 2014 Posted September 7, 2014 Navarro. d'Arnaud's likely headed for the OF once Plawecki reaches the majors to protect him from concussions, negating any value he had at C. d'Arnaud if you regard pitch framing.. but his value is hurt by the 12 PB caused by trying to frame pitches for strikes. A -0.8dWAR doesn't help. By WAR, Navarro wins with a 2.0 WAR (2.1 oWAR, 0.4 dWAR) over d'Arnaud's 0.4 WAR (1.9 oWAR, -0.8dWAR) Just because the catcher is a good pitch framer doesn't mean he's good.. look at JP Arencibia. They have to at least hit a little bit and not kill the team with frequent K's and PBs.
immature Verified Member Posted September 7, 2014 Author Posted September 7, 2014 Where did you get those WAR stats, they seem to reflect the players results better. I was using Fangraphs columns of OFF and DEF before the final column of WAR.
Statman Verified Member Posted September 7, 2014 Posted September 7, 2014 d`Arnaud is garbage. Navarro on the other hand can be an everyday player as a serviceable DH and 2nd catcher. The Jays need Russell Martin BAD!
Key22 Verified Member Posted September 7, 2014 Posted September 7, 2014 All the money needs to be put to starting pitchers as close to number 1s as is humanly possible. And land a full time 2B. Navarro is "good enough" to win with if you don't have huge gaping holes at other key positions. A solid catcher a solid second baseman - don;t have to be all stars - average defense and average bat is fine if you have a Roy Halladay, Roger Clemense, Randy Johnson, Greg Maddux in their prime on the mound. On good days those guys could win with a little league team behind them. When you give up 8 runs a LOT then blaming the catcher's pitch framing or Reyes who averages 1 error every 15 games is placing blame where it doesn't much matter. We have no top of the rotation starters.
Stangstag Old-Timey Member Posted September 7, 2014 Posted September 7, 2014 You guys are all f***ing retarded if you would rather have d'Arnaud over Navarro this year. For the future, I would obviously choose d'Arnaud BUT I don't think he will stick as a catcher.
jaysfan2014 Old-Timey Member Posted September 7, 2014 Posted September 7, 2014 Where did you get those WAR stats, they seem to reflect the players results better. I was using Fangraphs columns of OFF and DEF before the final column of WAR. Baseball Reference.
jaysfan2014 Old-Timey Member Posted September 7, 2014 Posted September 7, 2014 This piece in the Wall Street Journal isn't exactly saying good things about d'Arnaud's defense.. he should focus on catching the ball and not just framing. http://online.wsj.com/articles/n-y-mets-defense-a-flaw-in-travis-darnauds-game-1409790675 Sure, it helps the pitchers get strikes, but the PBs can really hurt with runners on base.
GD Old-Timey Member Posted September 7, 2014 Posted September 7, 2014 Fail. Lol @ you thinking I meant that as a link
GD Old-Timey Member Posted September 7, 2014 Posted September 7, 2014 LoL @ you for doing that on purpose. Lol @ you covering your ass and now trying to make this a discussion at 11:41 PM Lol @ you Lol @ #Lovethisforum Lol @ life it's time for bed
burlingtonbandit Old-Timey Member Posted September 7, 2014 Posted September 7, 2014 This piece in the Wall Street Journal isn't exactly saying good things about d'Arnaud's defense.. he should focus on catching the ball and not just framing. http://online.wsj.com/articles/n-y-mets-defense-a-flaw-in-travis-darnauds-game-1409790675 Sure, it helps the pitchers get strikes, but the PBs can really hurt with runners on base. 3 Strikes that are actually balls with a runner on base is better than 1 PB that allows a runner to advance a base. There are stats that tell you what is more valuable btw...So you can save your time instead of looking for stories about PB on WSJ
North of 60 Verified Member Posted September 7, 2014 Posted September 7, 2014 This is not even close when you include framing. We all know all about framing after the Kratz trade.
burlingtonbandit Old-Timey Member Posted September 7, 2014 Posted September 7, 2014 Lol was anyone from the board on with Mike Wilner tonight? Someone was advocating Russ Martin and brought up framing.. Starts right around the 13:30 mark. http://pmd.fan590.com/podcasts/blue_jays_this_week/bjtw_20140907_000407--BlueJaysTalkThis-Week---September-7---Saturday-.mp3 Also if you want a laugh go to the 36:30 mark and listen to Wilner tee off on the caller.
Arjun Nimmala Vancouver Canadians - A+ SS It's been slow going at the start of the season for Nimmala, but on Sunday, he was 3-for-5 with his 3rd home run and 3 RBI. Explore Arjun Nimmala News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now