NorthOf49 Old-Timey Member Posted July 25, 2014 Posted July 25, 2014 Honestly, what advantage would there be to pitching your closer, set-up guy and starter in reverse order like that? I really don't see any. Because you ensure that your best per-inning pitchers are used while the game's result is being decided. You're going to want to use your closer and set-up man in the game, that's a given. You don't want to save them until a high-leverage spot later in the game since that opportunity may not come. So get them out of the way first, then play the rest of the game situationally. If two lefties are due up in the fifth, go to Cecil and postpone Stroman's appearance.
TheHurl Site Manager Posted July 25, 2014 Posted July 25, 2014 s***. I'm no good at detecting sarcasm online. Did you know that the ¿ was originally created to show sarcasm but it never caught on. I don't believe that is actually a true story but a friend told me that today and I'm going with it. Bring the ¿ back!
KingKat Old-Timey Member Posted July 25, 2014 Posted July 25, 2014 Because you ensure that your best per-inning pitchers are used while the game's result is being decided. You're going to want to use your closer and set-up man in the game, that's a given. You don't want to save them until a high-leverage spot later in the game since that opportunity may not come. So get them out of the way first, then play the rest of the game situationally. If two lefties are due up in the fifth, go to Cecil and postpone Stroman's appearance. Yes but high leverage is largely a creation of the order you put the pitchers in. If you use Janssen and Loup and Stroman blows the game, that's no better than having Stroman get hit hard and not having high leverage inning for Janssen and Loup. So what if you guaranteed that Janssen and Loup went in the game, the importance of the innings they give you to the final outcome is still just as dependant on what Stroman does and you're f***ing with people's comfort and habits for no good reason. Relievers like having a rough idea when they're coming in. They like to know roughly when to slam down their red bull and what not and Stroman has a ritual he goes through when he's starting that wouldn't be the same when he's coming in form the bullpen. You'd mess with that just to artificially assure that you don't miss your chance of putting Janssen and Loup in the game.
burlingtonbandit Old-Timey Member Posted July 25, 2014 Posted July 25, 2014 Because you ensure that your best per-inning pitchers are used while the game's result is being decided. You're going to want to use your closer and set-up man in the game, that's a given. You don't want to save them until a high-leverage spot later in the game since that opportunity may not come. So get them out of the way first, then play the rest of the game situationally. If two lefties are due up in the fifth, go to Cecil and postpone Stroman's appearance. I think there would be more harm than good with that scenario. Janssen could feel uncomfortable starting a game and then you are down early. While I hate how intangibles are used sometimes there is a human element and taking someone out of their comfort zone is not a bad thing. Also whats to say Stroman is not better in the first couple innings because starters put up weaker numbers than relievers usually because they have to face the order multiple times and that would be the first time through the order. Just start Stroman and use the bullpen like you would normally.
TwistedLogic Old-Timey Member Posted July 25, 2014 Posted July 25, 2014 Dunno about that, man. O's have been heating up lately. I don't care if the O's are in heat. The Astros and Royals "heated up" at one point. I don't this TL was being serious Oh no, I was being quite serious
CJ-Freeway Old-Timey Member Posted July 25, 2014 Posted July 25, 2014 Did you know that the ¿ was originally created to show sarcasm but it never caught on. I don't believe that is actually a true story but a friend told me that today and I'm going with it. Bring the ¿ back! That's cool, I did not know that!
CJ-Freeway Old-Timey Member Posted July 25, 2014 Posted July 25, 2014 I don't care if the O's are in heat. The Astros and Royals "heated up" at one point. Oh no, I was being quite serious True. Anyhow, let's see how the Jays handle the Yanks this weekend. Let's also see if the O's can beat the Jays with our full lineup when EE is back.
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted July 25, 2014 Author Posted July 25, 2014 s***. I'm no good at detecting sarcasm online. Me neither apparently
TwistedLogic Old-Timey Member Posted July 25, 2014 Posted July 25, 2014 Fine, you guys have convinced me that I was being way too optimistic. Jays take division with 92 wins.
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted July 25, 2014 Author Posted July 25, 2014 Fine, you guys have convinced me that I was being way too optimistic. Jays take division with 92 wins. BIG MASSIVE SUPER DUPER PENULTIMATE FRANCHISE-DEFINING SERIES AGAINST NYY STARTING TONIGHT LET'S NOT GET AHEAD OF OURSELVES sf* *sarcasm filler
Dick_Pole Old-Timey Member Posted July 26, 2014 Posted July 26, 2014 It's fun to speculate, but it is just speculation. It really depends on the situation and who the Jays would be facing (trouble against lefties, trouble against the knuckleball). To be honest you could make a case for any of the 5 guys in the rotation, which we should really count that as a blessing. AT LEAST this year the starting rotation hasn't been a rotating clown show where if the Jays were in the position of the playoffs, you would scratch 3 guys off the list immediately.
John_Havok Old-Timey Member Posted July 26, 2014 Posted July 26, 2014 I surely wouldn't be picking Buerhle, he puts way too many balls in play and relies on defense and stranding runners, not exactly the recipe you want in a 1 game playoff. You want the guy with better swing and miss stuff IMO.
GeorgiaPeach Verified Member Posted July 26, 2014 Posted July 26, 2014 I heard his I/v after the game last night & he talked about how he's now throwing a sinker and he just kinda learned it/added to his repertoire and i'm thinking, holy hayzeus, who is this guy?! You'd think with all the questions about his size and not being able to get enough downward plane on his fastball he would've worked on a sinker or splitter from the get-go.
GeorgiaPeach Verified Member Posted July 26, 2014 Posted July 26, 2014 And yet you still can't buy a Stroman jersey online?? WTF? I have 200 bucks sitting here and I f***ing want one now!! Unless you don't mind buying a knock off at a fraction of the price.
jays4life19 Old-Timey Member Posted July 26, 2014 Posted July 26, 2014 Changed my mind. Brandon Morrow.
comeon sense Verified Member Posted July 27, 2014 Posted July 27, 2014 If its at home Strohman On the road Hutchison
JugglingPitches Verified Member Posted July 27, 2014 Posted July 27, 2014 Buehrle. Wouldn't want to throw Stroman in a pressure game like that.
jays_fever Old-Timey Member Posted July 28, 2014 Posted July 28, 2014 I'd go with Buehrle as well and start Stroman game 1 if we do win it.
Caper Verified Member Posted July 28, 2014 Posted July 28, 2014 I would rather face the Angels in a one off then a best of 7.
burlingtonbandit Old-Timey Member Posted July 28, 2014 Posted July 28, 2014 Has to be Stroman. He is the best pitcher on the staff. Honestly I would not want Buehrle pitching it. Too many balls put into play and his command hasn't been the greatest this year.
reedjohnsonfan Verified Member Posted July 28, 2014 Posted July 28, 2014 Gotta go with Dickey I think.
jays76 Verified Member Posted July 28, 2014 Posted July 28, 2014 Management will be politically correct and tip Dickey or Buerhle but it should be Stroman if he continually plays at a high level during the stretch.
0ctobyte Verified Member Posted July 28, 2014 Posted July 28, 2014 Stroman. Clearly Jays best pitcher so far
closetjaysfan Verified Member Posted July 28, 2014 Posted July 28, 2014 I would say Stroman except he will probably be shut down by then
Spoonovic Verified Member Posted July 28, 2014 Posted July 28, 2014 I would say Stroman except he will probably be shut down by then No way should we shut down Stroman if we have a chance to make the playoffs. We havent made the playoffs in 20 years for god's sake. Pull all the stops!
burlingtonbandit Old-Timey Member Posted July 28, 2014 Posted July 28, 2014 I would say Stroman except he will probably be shut down by then He pitched 120 innings last year combined with AA and AFL so he should be able to throw at least 150 this year. He's thrown 100 so far which would mean 50 more innings if you go by that estimate. With 56 games left in the regular season you could say 11 starts left for each pitcher. Not a stretch to see him reach that 150 IP by mid September but if this team is in a playoff race and he is not showing any fatigue there is no way you can shut him down. I think Stroman should be able to handle the workload because he has a really athletic delivery and hasn't had any arm trouble in the past. Knock on wood.
Molitor Verified Member Posted July 29, 2014 Posted July 29, 2014 Dickey sees this thread earlier today: "Gosh... f*** y'all then."
JoJo Parker Dunedin Blue Jays - A SS On Tuesday, Parker was just 1-for-5, but the one hit was his first professional home run. Explore JoJo Parker News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now