Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted

Tied with NYY and 3 games back of BAL with Lind, Edwin and Lawrie return not too far off. 8 days to trade deadline.

 

NYY and Bosox are sure to add to their rosters heavily 2015 and 2016. Cubs and Padres have made the moves discussed ad naseum.

 

Hutch looks tired. The rest of the rotation is meh still and the pen has been quite bad.

 

Sanchez looked better than most expected but only 2 innings. Means 0.

 

2nd, pen, D and the rotation all have issues to address as well as RHH against LHP. (our competition also has lots of holes)

 

Reyes has been on fire offensively and Colby has been worse than 2012. Melky and Jose B pretty steady.

 

Is AA going to:

 

1. Stand pat and hope they get healthy and keep looking better as they have the last couple games. Look to future and cheap young rotation.

 

2. Tinker with the line up with some modest additions (Prado? ish) to fill holes and hope that will keep us interesting and in it.

 

3. Sell off major assets for rebuild looking to add for a build around a future young cheap rotation we bring up.

 

4. Make a big move(s) for run at it moving key prospects now that the market has been established.

 

5. Pull a Carter Alomar deal few see coming where major assets get swapped.

 

Probably 2. We look more like the team that got so hot the last couple games with good D and speed and some clutch hits. Going to be interesting.

  • Replies 154
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Community Moderator
Posted
I say #2. Which I also believe is the correct thing to do. Don't kill the farm. But still manage to improve the team.
Posted
I say #2. Which I also believe is the correct thing to do. Don't kill the farm. But still manage to improve the team.

 

Like me you have changed view. The rash of major injuries and the depth or of holes made me change from going for it to 2.

 

Still pissed we didn't make these moves in the off season as I believe we wont have as weak a division next couple years. Still a bit torn on direction for that reason.

Posted

first....make a small upgrade that does not require us to move anything significant back.

second....hope and pray we stay healthy for the rest of the year.

Community Moderator
Posted
Like me you have changed view. The rash of major injuries and the depth or of holes made me change from going for it to 2.

 

Still pissed we didn't make these moves in the off season as I believe we wont have as weak a division next couple years. Still a bit torn on direction for that reason.

 

Yep

 

AA SHOULD have acquired a good young 2B this off season and should have signed a free agent starter

 

In retrospect, the lack of signing a FA starter hasn't hurt us (yet) but the 2B situation sure has

Posted
Yep

 

AA SHOULD have acquired a good young 2B this off season and should have signed a free agent starter

 

In retrospect, the lack of signing a FA starter hasn't hurt us (yet) but the 2B situation sure has

 

If you compare what we could have gotten for FA starter against 4/5 performance in our rotation don't you think that would have been worth + 2/3 games W so far? Puts us in tie.

Posted

Option 2, but target a McCarthy-like starter rather than an infielder/bat.

 

I don't want to go large again and gut further to get another bat, especially when we have bats coming back. I think getting someone like Beltre would be nice, but too expensive. Ultimately, to get this offence going, we need our existing healthy-ish guys like Bautista and Rasmus to heat up and have that complemented by the return of Lind, EE and Lawrie.

Community Moderator
Posted
If you compare what we could have gotten for FA starter against 4/5 performance in our rotation don't you think that would have been worth + 2/3 games W so far? Puts us in tie.

 

First I was going to say "probably, it depends who"

 

Then I looked up the three guys AA was presumably interested in last off season. And realized that NONE of Garza, Jimenez or Santana would have been an upgrade over Happ, at least to this point, according to WAR.

 

Happ's 0.9 WAR is on par with Santana's, and the other 2 have provided neutral or negative wins for their teams.

Posted
Option 2, but target a McCarthy-like starter rather than an infielder/bat.

 

I don't want to go large again and gut further to get another bat, especially when we have bats coming back. I think getting someone like Beltre would be nice, but too expensive. Ultimately, to get this offence going, we need our existing healthy-ish guys like Bautista and Rasmus to heat up and have that complemented by the return of Lind, EE and Lawrie.

 

is there anyone left that is really like McCarthy? The only ones I can think of are on the team we are facing right now.

Posted
Tied with NYY and 3 games back of BAL with Lind, Edwin and Lawrie return not too far off. 8 days to trade deadline.

 

NYY and Bosox are sure to add to their rosters heavily 2015 and 2016. Cubs and Padres have made the moves discussed ad naseum.

 

Hutch looks tired. The rest of the rotation is meh still and the pen has been quite bad.

 

Sanchez looked better than most expected but only 2 innings. Means 0.

 

2nd, pen, D and the rotation all have issues to address as well as RHH against LHP. (our competition also has lots of holes)

 

Reyes has been on fire offensively and Colby has been worse than 2012. Melky and Jose B pretty steady.

 

Is AA going to:

 

1. Stand pat and hope they get healthy and keep looking better as they have the last couple games. Look to future and cheap young rotation.

 

2. Tinker with the line up with some modest additions (Prado? ish) to fill holes and hope that will keep us interesting and in it.

 

3. Sell off major assets for rebuild looking to add for a build around a future young cheap rotation we bring up.

 

4. Make a big move(s) for run at it moving key prospects now that the market has been established.

 

5. Pull a Carter Alomar deal few see coming where major assets get swapped.

 

Probably 2. We look more like the team that got so hot the last couple games with good D and speed and some clutch hits. Going to be interesting.

 

For me it goes 2 > 4 > 1 > 5 > 3. I think some kind of rebuild is around the corner anyways but I'd rather try to get a playoff appearance in the interim even if it means getting little to nothing for many of your veterans.

Posted

Regarding NYY and BOS adding heavily to their rosters.. no guarantees on that. Free agency crop is severely lacking for this offseason. New York also has the albatross of the A-Rod deal to return to the roster.

 

Yankees also have very little to spend, with $161M+ already on the books for 2015 without incurring severe luxury tax penalties at $178M (+11M in benefits.)

Posted
A SP better than Happ (or maybe replace Hutchinson?), platoon partners for Rasmus and Lind, and a bullpen arm could all come cheap and would help improve the team.
Posted
A SP better than Happ (or maybe replace Hutchinson?), platoon partners for Rasmus and Lind, and a bullpen arm could all come cheap and would help improve the team.

 

Chris Denorfia should cost very very little. Fringe prospect or so. I'd like to see him be brought in as a platoon bat/4th OF.

Posted
First I was going to say "probably, it depends who"

 

Then I looked up the three guys AA was presumably interested in last off season. And realized that NONE of Garza, Jimenez or Santana would have been an upgrade over Happ, at least to this point, according to WAR.

 

Happ's 0.9 WAR is on par with Santana's, and the other 2 have provided neutral or negative wins for their teams.

 

I kind of thought that but was too lazy to look it up. Thanks. Just goes to show that sometimes these GMs aren't so dumb after all. Jiminez was a major 4 yr commitment and has not been great. I didn't see Stro making the contribution he has so far this year but any winning team has to have some positive surprises.

 

I still liked the 1 year deal for Santana and with Hutch seemingly running out of gas we could use that down the stretch.

Posted
Regarding NYY and BOS adding heavily to their rosters.. no guarantees on that. Free agency crop is severely lacking for this offseason. New York also has the albatross of the A-Rod deal to return to the roster.

 

Yankees also have very little to spend, with $161M+ already on the books for 2015 without incurring severe luxury tax penalties at $178M (+11M in benefits.)

 

wishful thinking IMO

Posted
Chris Denorfia should cost very very little. Fringe prospect or so. I'd like to see him be brought in as a platoon bat/4th OF.

 

Yeah he's a name that I thought of too. Reed Johnson or Justin Ruggiano could be had for very little too. Jeff Baker could be a bat to platoon with Lind but I wonder if the Jays would just rather use Reimold to do that.

 

As for SP, Jorge De la Rosa could be had for little and I think he'd be an upgrade over Happ. The Rockies also have Drew Stubbs who would probably cost more than we want.

 

One minor issue is what to do with the IF. If we brought in a platoon CF and then keep Reimold to platoon with Lind that only leaves one spot to platoon with Tolleson in the IF, Kawa or Francisco. Kawa is playing better but he has options and Francisco doesn't.

Community Moderator
Posted
I kind of thought that but was too lazy to look it up. Thanks. Just goes to show that sometimes these GMs aren't so dumb after all. Jiminez was a major 4 yr commitment and has not been great. I didn't see Stro making the contribution he has so far this year but any winning team has to have some positive surprises.

 

I still liked the 1 year deal for Santana and with Hutch seemingly running out of gas we could use that down the stretch.

 

Well that's just it. AA was counting on Morrow, but not sounting on Stroman. It worked out anyway.

 

He still SHOULD have signed Santana IYAM with the knowledge that Happ was probably going to be mediocre and Morrow not be reliable. But that non-signing hasn't hurt us the way the IF situation has.

Posted (edited)
I'm hoping it's 4 to make one final kick at the can this year and next with the current roster but I'd be happy with 2. What I think is going to happen is 1 because of the inneffectual offseason and doubletalk ramblings of AA this deadline.. Regarding Hutch I would happily package him & some prospects for a front end starter and an infeilder. Edited by jays76
Posted
#2 for me, but I'm very close to #3. Under no circumstances should we trade what we have left of a farm system for some rentals. I lie awake at night thinking of all the good young prospects we've burned on trades in the last 2 years.......DeSclafani, Marisnick, Nicolino, Syndergaard.......my head hurts.......
Posted
I think we may already have a platoon partner for Lind and our 4th outfielder ... Reimold
Community Moderator
Posted
#2 for me, but I'm very close to #3. Under no circumstances should we trade what we have left of a farm system for some rentals. I lie awake at night thinking of all the good young prospects we've burned on trades in the last 2 years.......DeSclafani, Marisnick, Syndergaard.......my head hurts.......

 

It hurts less if you get to go to ALCS games in Toronto :)

Old-Timey Member
Posted
First I was going to say "probably, it depends who"

 

Then I looked up the three guys AA was presumably interested in last off season. And realized that NONE of Garza, Jimenez or Santana would have been an upgrade over Happ, at least to this point, according to WAR.

 

Happ's 0.9 WAR is on par with Santana's, and the other 2 have provided neutral or negative wins for their teams.

 

Happ - 0.9 fWAR

Ubaldo - 0.4 fWAR

Santana - 2.0 fWAR

Garza - 2.0 fWAR

 

You should probably stop using bWAR

Posted
1 or 2. However it would not surprise me at all if they started shopping Hutch around. Maybe the Rockies who have Anderson and Stubbs (or Barnes) that should be of interest to the Jays. This doesn't really apply to a number 5 but still a major league piece as the centerpiece.
Posted
I think we may already have a platoon partner for Lind and our 4th outfielder ... Reimold

 

Yeah true but the problem is who platoons for Rasmus? Reimold doesn't really help with that.

Posted
1 or 2. However it would not surprise me at all if they started shopping Hutch around. Maybe the Rockies who have Anderson and Stubbs (or Barnes) that should be of interest to the Jays. This doesn't really apply to a number 5 but still a major league piece as the centerpiece.

 

Plus the Rockies are shopping Jorge De La Rosa who I've always liked.

Posted
A starting pitcher is our best bet. We could then move hutch to pen and he would be solid 1 inning at a time, so a starter would improve the team in two ways. Next year hutch can start again. Him and dirty Sanchez could be huge additions to the pen for this year. Maybe drabek as well.
Posted
Yeah true but the problem is who platoons for Rasmus? Reimold doesn't really help with that.

 

I have a feeling when Reimold is healthy and ready to come off the DL the Jays will not chance losing him by sending him to the minors so they will keep him on the 25 man roster

 

There could be some interesting roster decisions once EE, Lind, Lawrie and Reimold are activated

 

I am guessing EE and Lind will be activated first and Rasmussen and Francisco will be sent to minors ... Francisco may not clear waivers

 

When Lawrie is activated I think Kawasaki will be sent to minors but I am not sure what happens when Reimold is activated ... Gose back to minors I guess

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...