Convo Verified Member Posted March 30, 2014 Posted March 30, 2014 This guy sure would of looked good in a jays uniform last season. Good for Gomes.
Spoonovic Verified Member Posted March 30, 2014 Posted March 30, 2014 Yan Gomes explains everything that is wrong with this organization. We thought he wasnt even a major league player. Turns out hes a starting catcher.
NorthOf49 Old-Timey Member Posted March 30, 2014 Posted March 30, 2014 Yan Gomes explains everything that is wrong with this organization. We thought he wasnt even a major league player. Turns out hes a starting catcher. They even tried to convert him to 3B, given their organizational logjam (JPA, D'Arnaud). A year later, we have neither of those guys and Gomes looks like the best of the bunch...
John_Havok Old-Timey Member Posted March 30, 2014 Posted March 30, 2014 You guys are putting way too much stock in 322 PA from one season.
Laika Community Moderator Posted March 30, 2014 Posted March 30, 2014 Yan Gomes is a monument towards the ignorance of the Blue Jays FO! (watch him hit like a backup this year now)
jaysfan2014 Old-Timey Member Posted March 30, 2014 Posted March 30, 2014 His BABIP was .342 last year, and considering the average is .300, he's expected to regress. Most of his value is more due to his defense. In addition, his spring numbers have shown an increased K rate and lower average. Indians would have been better off waiting until there was more certainty that he'll continue to hit. With Carlos Santana at 3B now and no decent catching prospects in the minors, the Indians are going to sink or swim depending on Gomes.
Laika Community Moderator Posted March 30, 2014 Posted March 30, 2014 ZiPS and Steamer both project nearly 3 WAR in ~400 PA. Those projection systems would take into account the small major league sample size in 2013. His minor league peripherals would still be pretty big factors in those.
Spoonovic Verified Member Posted March 30, 2014 Posted March 30, 2014 They even tried to convert him to 3B, given their organizational logjam (JPA, D'Arnaud). A year later, we have neither of those guys and Gomes looks like the best of the bunch... You think Gomes looks better than D'Arnaud?
eastcoastjaysfan Old-Timey Member Posted March 30, 2014 Posted March 30, 2014 You guys are putting way too much stock in 322 PA from one season. Regardless, that trade was still f***ing ridiculous. Two very useful players for a completely useless fringe reliever.
John_Havok Old-Timey Member Posted March 30, 2014 Posted March 30, 2014 Regardless, that trade was still f***ing ridiculous. Two very useful players for a completely useless fringe reliever. Yes, that's true for sure.
connorp Old-Timey Member Posted March 30, 2014 Posted March 30, 2014 wow.. Im sure this has to come from what they see outside of gameday.. they surely didn't base a deal like that on last season.. you wouldn't think anyway
Abomination Old-Timey Member Posted March 30, 2014 Posted March 30, 2014 wow.. Im sure this has to come from what they see outside of gameday.. they surely didn't base a deal like that on last season.. you wouldn't think anyway It seems like it would have been smart for them to wait another 1/2 year or so.
8D Verified Member Posted March 30, 2014 Posted March 30, 2014 Pretty surprising. One would think any club would wait at least one more full season before extending him. They must really love this kid.
dineke Old-Timey Member Posted March 30, 2014 Posted March 30, 2014 Yan Gomes explains everything that is wrong with this organization. We thought he wasnt even a major league player. Turns out hes a starting catcher. To be fair, nobody thought he was going to be a starting caliber catcher at the time of the trade.
TheHurl Site Manager Posted March 30, 2014 Posted March 30, 2014 I love deals like this. Truly they are pretty low risk and two of these 6 years are option years. Alex Avila will make $2.9, $4.8 and $5.2 over his arbitration years. Pretty sure that was the comp used.
eastcoastjaysfan Old-Timey Member Posted March 30, 2014 Posted March 30, 2014 To be fair, nobody thought he was going to be a starting caliber catcher at the time of the trade. No, but there was talk of him being a super utility guy at the time (playing 3B, 1B, and some C). You don't give up young, versatile talent like that, especially when you have such a gaping hole behind the plate.
TheHurl Site Manager Posted March 30, 2014 Posted March 30, 2014 To be fair, nobody thought he was going to be a starting caliber catcher at the time of the trade. Question is why not? Why was he able to move up to the majors and put up a lower K-rate than he did in the high minors. Why did we move him off of catcher, when he's getting really good reviews from the metrics as well as the scouts? Sometimes players just find their game, sometimes it's just a lucky few months...but overall another org sees enough in him to commit to him for the rest of the decade and we saw little in him over 5 years.
Grant77 Old-Timey Member Posted March 30, 2014 Posted March 30, 2014 Nobody was shedding a tear when we dealt Gomes for Rogers, so let's not pretend now that everyone saw this coming.
GD Old-Timey Member Posted March 30, 2014 Posted March 30, 2014 Nobody was shedding a tear when we dealt Gomes for Rogers, so let's not pretend now that everyone saw this coming. Really? Trading Gomes and Aviles for a reliever wasn't well received IIRC
connorp Old-Timey Member Posted March 30, 2014 Posted March 30, 2014 Nobody was shedding a tear when we dealt Gomes for Rogers, so let's not pretend now that everyone saw this coming. We're all amateurs though with limited info to work from, its not our career or what we get paid big bucks for.. you can question the org even if you didn't see it coming.. that said, of course all orgs will miss at times.. just Jays don't seem to have many "hits" to balance it out
connorp Old-Timey Member Posted March 30, 2014 Posted March 30, 2014 Really? Trading Gomes and Aviles for a reliever wasn't well received IIRC Yeah I believe a lot of ppl disliked it not because of thinking Gomes would be good... but it didn't make sense with Jays depth structure.. I know I disliked it
Laika Community Moderator Posted March 30, 2014 Posted March 30, 2014 Hey guys, remember when two garbage utility guys and DFA candidate cast-offs turned into HR monsters for us? That was fun.
NorthOf49 Old-Timey Member Posted March 30, 2014 Posted March 30, 2014 Really? Trading Gomes and Aviles for a reliever wasn't well received IIRC Also, I had no idea that Gomes could actually catch at the time of the trade. I was viewing him as a corner infielder. Now I'm hearing that he's a great framer and has elite pop times. I had no way of knowing that then because the Jays didn't like him behind the plate.
Laika Community Moderator Posted March 30, 2014 Posted March 30, 2014 Interesting tidbit from the Edwin feature on Sportsnet today - AA says that the Blue Jays didn't even want him included in the Rolen trade. They fought to not have to take Edwin on, but the Reds insisted on it to make the salaries and everything balance out. I was always under the impression that at the time of the trade to acquire him they at least kind of liked something in his skillset (even if he turned into 3B poop and they ended up DFA-ing him down the road).
GD Old-Timey Member Posted March 30, 2014 Posted March 30, 2014 Also, I had no idea that Gomes could actually catch at the time of the trade. I was viewing him as a corner infielder. Now I'm hearing that he's a great framer and has elite pop times. I had no way of knowing that then because the Jays didn't like him behind the plate. Really? I remember liking him behind the plate. Didn't know he was THAT good but he had 50 innings back there in 2012. I disliked it cause of Aviles, though. I liked the idea of moving a capable gloved shortstop with a below average bat to second base and reaping the defensive benefits. Gee, guys, that sounds like a good idea. Why aren't we trying that?
Orgfiller Old-Timey Member Posted March 30, 2014 Posted March 30, 2014 Really? I remember liking him behind the plate. Didn't know he was THAT good but he had 50 innings back there in 2012. I disliked it cause of Aviles, though. I liked the idea of moving a capable gloved shortstop with a below average bat to second base and reaping the defensive benefits. Gee, guys, that sounds like a good idea. Why aren't we trying that? This, most of us didn't expect Gomes to become much but after being gifted Aviles and just giving him away for practically nothing that made it harder to swallow.
eastcoastjaysfan Old-Timey Member Posted March 30, 2014 Posted March 30, 2014 Nobody was shedding a tear when we dealt Gomes for Rogers, so let's not pretend now that everyone saw this coming. http://www.forums.mlb.com/n/pfx/forum.aspx?tsn=21&nav=messages&webtag=ml-bluejays&tid=86985 A lot of people were against this trade when it happened. You were highly in favour of it though! Has your opinion of Gomes changed? "I was fairly impressed with Gomes' defense while he was here. He can play passable defense at several positions, including catcher, which will give you some nice flexibility. There's some power in his bat, but his swing mechanics are incredibly inconsistent and I think you'll find that he struggles to hit more than .220 or so." -Grant77
Laika Community Moderator Posted March 30, 2014 Posted March 30, 2014 We traded Rolen for Edwin. But I will give you Robinzon Diaz for Bautista. The Blue Jays didn't even want him in that trade though. The Reds forced them to take Edwin to make the trade work (salaries and s***).
Arjun Nimmala Vancouver Canadians - A+ SS It's been slow going at the start of the season for Nimmala, but on Sunday, he was 3-for-5 with his 3rd home run and 3 RBI. Explore Arjun Nimmala News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now