Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Pendleton

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    9,760

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Pendleton

  1. Pendleton
    I think the writing is on the wall now as far as Edwin is concerned.
  2. Pendleton
    Vs RHP RF Fowler SS Tulo 3B Donaldson DH Morales LF Pearce C Martin 2B Travis 1B Smoak CF Pillar Vs LHP RF Fowler SS Tulo 3B Donaldson DH Morales 1B Pearce C Martin LF Upton CF Pillar In my opinion we have the potential to put together some damn good lineups, but I'm 100% sold that we need to sign Fowler to lead off.
  3. Pendleton
    If it's only as an injury replacement I'm fine with that. There are worse scenarios than having to call up a great defender, at least he provides something. Like I said though, more than fine with moving him too.
  4. Pendleton
    Is there really a big difference if they were to trade Granderson for prospects and sign a high end reliever?
  5. Pendleton
    Why? I'm fine with trading/losing Goins but it doesn't hurt anything at all to have him play 2B in Buffalo.
  6. Pendleton
    Really dumb comment, read through this thread if you would like to know why. Goins probably does have more value to us a reliever at this point!
  7. Pendleton
    I definitely wouldn't expect much in return, a AAAA arm who has a shot at cracking the bullpen.
  8. Pendleton
    Goins for a depth arm makes the most sense
  9. Pendleton
    Maybe it wouldn't be a bad idea to try and shop him around right now for a bullpen candidate of some sort.
  10. Pendleton
  11. Pendleton
    And with Morales able to take some starts at 1B vs righties, that should mean we don't need to start Smoak for more than about 60 games barring injuries of course.
  12. Pendleton
    Yeah get him out of our division.
  13. Pendleton
    I will miss EE and wish him nothing but the best but at this point I think we're better off targeting a lead off OF bat like Fowler.
  14. Pendleton
    But even in those 350-400 ABs, he could outproduce some of our other starters who see 500+ ABs, that makes him a key contributor regardless.
  15. Pendleton
    As things stand Pearce would be our best option to start at 1B or either corner OF, but obviously we need to add a starting RF still.
  16. Pendleton
    Haha take it for what you want, but honestly it was just a dig at you not be able to focus on that actual point of my post.
  17. Pendleton
    You're calling Pearce a depth addition, and as things currently stand he'd be our best starting option at three different positions. He's here to be a key contributor, even if he does move around the diamond.
  18. Pendleton
    You say some dumb s*** sometimes.
  19. Pendleton
    So basically your reasoning for stating Moreland > Pearce is paranoia?
  20. Pendleton
    RHP - Smoak/Morales 1B, Pearce/Carerra LF LHP - Pearce 1B, Upton LF
  21. Pendleton
    It's not impossible but it doesn't really seem wise, this may be his best ever chance to cash in.
  22. Pendleton
    I proposed this idea with Bautista in mind but it absolutely works for Pearce as well. 1B - Pearce takes the majority of starts against LHP, Smoak and Morales split the starts against RHP. LF - Pearce against RHP (with Carerra taking the odd start), Upton vs LHP. DH - Majority of games to Morales but the 30+ starts he has at 1B allow for other vets to DH on off days (Martin, Tulo, Donaldson etc) I won't post an estimate of how many games they'd each play because last time I think it gave BBBB an ulcer.
  23. Pendleton
    The possibilities were endless and to be honest I'm a little disappointed in your effort here.
  24. Pendleton
    "It's almost like this guy is just here for the halibut"- that sort of thing?
  25. Pendleton
    It was a worthless point to fixate on because common sense would say that one of our bench players would fill the spot if someone got hurt, however likely you may feel that is - and I clearly pointed out in that original post that injuries could affect those numbers). If you don't want Bautista back that's fine, but your predictions are just that and not any sort of factual argument. It's very possible that Bautista becomes a good value signing later in the off season if he wants to try and rebuild value on a one year deal. I was merely pointing out a way that his bat could help this lineup as it's currently constructed. Whether you like the guy or not, there's no denying that there's still value left in that bat for the right price.
×
×
  • Create New...