Holy s*** - I made the mistake of looking at the Yahoo comments on this story....
Bob Gibson pitched for 17 seasons. From 1963 through 1974 he averaged 18.5 complete games, 263 innings and 19.45 wins per season. Now he was a pitcher.
So basically this practice is just converting starting pitchers to glorified long relievers.
I remember more than two to three decades ago when we actually had single game pitcher complete games! What a novelty. In those days the third even fourth rated pitcher on a team could literally have more individual complete games in a season than an entire team does today!!!
Greg Maddux once threw a complete game with 76 pitches. Just sayin'
I'd be extremely disappointed if Bum said he was ok with an "opener". I want the starting pitchers to have the attitude that they will start and finish a game not just "let me get through 5 innings". I love baseball but some of these methods they're trying to use these days is lessening the durability of some of these players. You look at the early 90s and before and pitchers were throwing many more innings and pitches and not suffering the same injuries as today. I don't have the stats in front of me, it I would venture to guess most of those pitchers (the good ones obviously) pitched even longer in the majors then most of the pitchers of today last too. Analytics can be a useful tool, but it also can be detrimental .
Back in the day, MLB didn't even have closers, much less middle-relievers...but now openers? Good grief.
Using openers will eventually ruin baseball if the trend grows. Instead, why don't coaches quit babying their starters as they are coming up through the system and let them develop some stamina and strength to be able to pitch six or seven or eight innings each start?
Is Yahoo the unofficial home of senior citizens? I hope to god I never become this close minded. How difficult is it to understand that hitters are significantly better now then they were 30 years ago? They understand mechanics better, they train better, they eat better, etc. Pitching has likewise transformed to counter these changes. You can't be a great pitcher with a K/9 of 5.2 and a BB/9 of 3.2 anymore (like Dave Stieb). The vast majority (95%?) of pitchers can't succeed by pacing themselves and trying to throw a CG anymore.
I assume we're past the days when teams want the starting pitchers to have the attitude that they will start and finish a game right? I have to assume they are more educated now - explaining that their job is to go flat out as long as they can and "get through 5 or 6 innings" because that's how they'll be most successful. This isn't that difficult of concept to understand. I know people hate change, but c'mon people.