Yeah I think the biggest thing here is just how these deals are reported. Ohtani signs for 10/700 and Snell for 5/182 makes it seem as if the Dodgers are flexing their financial muscle to vastly overpay for players. They aren't really, Ohtani actually went for 10/460 and 5/153 or whatever, which they still need to pay over the duration of their contracts into escrow. It's not like they're "only" paying Ohtani $2MM and Snell $18M per season, they still have to pay out the escrow amount. The rest of it is still being actively paid out by them, so this is where their financial muscle is actually being flexed.
They're still spending an insane amount each year on payroll, be it for present year payments, or future payments to the same players. Not every team can pull this part off, you still need to be able to afford having Freeman, Betts, Ohtani, Snell, Glasnow, Yamamoto etc. on FA level deals at the same time, while still affording to give out "pillow" 1/23.5 deals to Teoscar Hernandez level players. I think this is the part people are/should be actually upset about, but it's being convoluted around the misunderstanding from them as being mad at all these deferrals and complex contract structures. The Dodgers are on a late 90s/early 2000s Yankee esque run of domination that includes them attracting and signing just about every big FA. That's disheartening as a fan of a non big market team, and I'm not even really including the Blue Jays in this as we've seen that a top 10 payroll can very much get the job done against these kinds of teams.
Adding Soto to this mix would be an absolute slap in the face to MLB fans in terms of parity. Super teams are great for ratings but it sucks for everyone else who are fans of the sport or literally any other team.