I do agree with this sentence but if AA thought he had defensive value, there was a serious misjudging of Bonifacio's skill set. There isn't anything that Bonifacio does that Rajai Davis doesn't do better (unless you count playing terrible 2B). No one could have predicted just how badly swapping out a better defender like Aviles for Bonifacio would have backfired but it's really hard to argue it was a good idea. AA seems to have a strange infatuation with certain rather fringy players (Happ, Bonifacio, Rogers) which can't help but make you question his player valuations. I don't know if you've read Great Expectations but in it, Lott and Davidi describe conversations between Beeston and Anthopoulos where they discussed how important it was to acquire Bonifacio because he's such an exciting, entertaining player. That's not the kind of cold rational that you have been giving for the Bonifacio acquisition. Now of course, Lott and Davidi weren't actually there so maybe the conversation that actually took place and the one the principals described to them aren't the same but it certainly gives you pause. You can always give AA the benefit of the doubt but don't you feel like you have to do that a lot? There is zero indication in Great Expectations that Escobar played an important role in negotiations but there's clear indication that both Mathis and Bonifacio did. If you don't find that alarming then I guess you're just a far different Jays fan than I.