Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

jaysblue

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    18,784

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by jaysblue

  1. jaysblue
    Depends on if we're talking about elite guys at all those positions or middle tier/average guys just to fill holes on the roster. Adding a top arm that is a solid No. 2 or 3 starter, along with two elite relievers and an above average left-handed bat is a lot. It's not impossible, though you would be digging a lot into the farm system. Also, the Yankees, Red Sox, Rays and other teams will be buyers most likely as well. Like you said, the Jays will be locks at making the Postseason, so definitely they will be buyers. Atkins has been active at trade deadlines the previous two seasons buying, so this season won't be any different IMO. Though the Jays can't go after broken down projects and expect that will be enough. Hope they get a player or arm or both that could push the team over the top.
  2. jaysblue
    That's a big shopping list. If the Blue Jays front office actually spent time in the offseason looking at the bench and bullpen, maybe at the trade deadline the Jays could have mainly focused on bringing in a big bat or big arm. Instead, we're talking about filling 4 or 5 holes on this roster which is a lot at the trade deadline.
  3. jaysblue
    The Jays could use another left-handed bat who is actually decent + a top starter + 2 or 3 elite BP arms. Yikes, that is a shopping list! We were talking about Josh Bell in April/May, and that was before the need for a top starter and BP arms.
  4. jaysblue

    NHL Thread

    jaysblue replied to GD's topic in Other Sports

    Leafs could never play this caliber of hockey like Tampa and Colorado. The Leafs still have a long way to go until they become true Stanley Cup contenders.
  5. jaysblue
    Jonathan Villar available. Hired William from LOD as an agent to trade him. Giving him a 20% cut if he finds a suitor.
  6. jaysblue
    Over a 162 game season, if you don't have a strong bullpen, you need your top starters to go deep into games, even if that means having them throw 100-110 pitches. It's not going to kill them. That's why a starter like Roy Halladay was so valuable. You knew even on his bad days (maybe he gives up 4ER), he would give you 6 or 7 innings and save the bullpen. In the Postseason, you definitely can manage differently. You can shorten the game for starting pitchers and use your elite BP arms two games in a row, knowing they will have an off-day and be rested for Game 3.
  7. jaysblue
    I love Tampa and they're one of my favourite organizations though what works in Tampa doesn't repeat and work for all the remaining 29 teams. Not every team will have a deep bullpen and deep system of arms who they can call up and rely on over 162 games.
  8. jaysblue
    Yeah sorry about the Burnett addition, his 2008 season was at the back of my mind when mentioning him. Doc and him were such a fantastic 1-2 punch and workhorses that season. Should have used Oswalt instead haha.
  9. jaysblue
    I'm not muddling the point. Though the thinking amongst front offices, management and stat geeks is that starters shouldn't be pushed going 7 or 8 innings/100 pitches and you're seeing that more and more around baseball. A lot of managers pull guys after only 70 or 80 pitches sometimes and don't allow their starters to work deeper into games. If you have an elite and deep bullpen then the strategy can work majority of the time, though when you have a mediocre bullpen, good luck over a full 162 game season. You will never see arms/workhorses like Verlander, Halladay, Oswalt, Wainwright, Randy Johnson, Curt Schilling etc. coming up again. The days of starters pitching 220 or more innings is over. Even last season, only 7 starters in all of baseball threw more than 200 innings. Wouldn't surprise me to see that number lower moving forward.
  10. jaysblue
    Mostly every pitcher is at more of a disadvantage third time through the order, versus first or second. Though that doesn't mean some of your top starters can't pitch a third time through the order. Again a lot depends on score, matchups, game situation, pitch count, # of stressful innings/pitches prior and most importantly the bullpen arms you have available. No reason why some of the Blue Jays top starters like Manoah, Gausman and Berrios can't pitch past the seventh inning on occasion when they have a good pitch count and aren't laboring. If they're cruising along, keep them in. If the score is 4-1 or 5-1 entering the 7th or 8th inning, and one of those starters is around 90 or so pitches, let them go out for the 7th or 8th and have guys in the BP warming up if need be. Again, depends on matchups at that time in the game.
  11. jaysblue
    Holy s***!
  12. jaysblue
    Burke and Puk since nobody has a lock on the closers role on both the Rangers and A's. Leclerc was activated off the IL and is making $5 million this season, so wouldn't shock me if the Rangers try him back in the 9th to build up his trade value. Plus if he rediscovers his old form before he was injured, he has two friendly team options for 2023 and 2024. Bautista I think could work his way to closing games in Baltimore as well. He's been very solid. Overall, can't go wrong with those three options. Both are providing solid ratios and you might get lucky with one or two of them getting consistent save chances.
  13. jaysblue
    Not as often as 5 to 10 years ago. Maybe some old school guys like Verlander, who is still averaging more than 6 innings per outing. A lot of younger arms or arms in general aren't being pushed as much these days. Depends on pitch count obviously and how stressful their innings were. I'm not advocating for every manager to go all Dusty Baker, though having a starter throw around 100 pitches per outing now seems like a rarity these days. You need a strong bullpen in order to shorten games for starters. Blue Jays don't have an elite or strong bullpen, so having a starter only going 5 or 6 innings makes it a lot more difficult. You need to cover 3 to 4 innings of relief pretty much every game, unless you have a starter or two who pitches into the 7th or 8th inning during the week. Makes you more vulnerable if you have a weak bullpen and over the course of a long season, some guys might even run out of gas when August or September come around.
  14. jaysblue
    I thought starters going 6 to 7 innings today wasn't the norm anymore because they throw at max effort? Starters that can go 7 or 8 innings majority of the time will help the overall bullpen. If a Blue Jays starter is under 100 pitches and is through 6 innings pitching well, they should be going out in the 7th.
  15. jaysblue
    So he is no longer a bust?
  16. jaysblue
    Also, lets revisit the term "Hall of Fame caliber player" in the context it was just used. Can we say for example someone like Tim Lincecum was a "Hall of Fame caliber player" developed in the Giants system? Lincecum was probably one of the most, if not most dominant pitchers in baseball during 2008 and 2009 winning the NL Cy Young in both of those years. As well, he did have some other quality seasons as well and helped the Giants win three championships. Though is he going to be a Hall of Famer? Likely not since he had a short career. Though if he stayed healthy and continued to pitch at a high level until his age 30 season and was at least a solid/consistent arm after his age 30 season producing seasons of 3-4 WAR, he likely would be a Hall of Famer.
  17. jaysblue
    Devers is only 25 and Bogaerts has already posted a career 31.6 WAR at the age of 29. Even already this season Bogaerts has 3.3 WAR which is tied for 8th best in the MLB. Devers is second with a 4.0 WAR. As long as they stay healthy and continue to produce at an elite level into their thirties, I don't see why not. Unless they completely fall off a cliff at the age of 30 and start becoming dumpster fires, though I doubt it. Most American writers and Boston writers will definitely give them votes. Plus winning a couple of Championships won't hurt. Playing for a team like the Red Sox or the Yankees always has its benefits. Maybe they don't get in on the first ballot, though don't see why they wouldn't get in during any one of the remaining years they're eligible if they continue to play well into their mid-to-late thirties.
  18. jaysblue
    If Devers and Bogaerts stay healthy and continue to produce at an elite level as they have, they definitely will make the Hall of Fame.
  19. jaysblue

    NBA Thread

    jaysblue replied to admin's topic in Other Sports

    Don't blame OG at all.
  20. jaysblue
    Jay always holds onto his price. I had to give in to get Liam Hendriks off of him in another league.
  21. jaysblue
    Michael Brantley for Carlos Carrasco
  22. jaysblue
    Good deal! I think a trade is very possible. Judge to the Blue Jays and he signs a 10-year extension worth $500 million to play in Toronto!
  23. jaysblue
    Moreno, Pearson, Biggio + a 1st round pick for Aaron Judge
  24. jaysblue

    NHL Thread

    jaysblue replied to GD's topic in Other Sports

    Kadri with the big goal!!!!
  25. jaysblue
    During an offseason, you can target buy low RP options and hope they have a great ST and start to the season. Nothing wrong with that. Agree 100% with what you said about struggling relievers midseason. Down the stretch you need guys performing, not guys who are still figuring it out or complete dumpster fires (e.g. Brad Hand last season).
×
×
  • Create New...