Laika

I guess I was wrong. Doesn't make a difference though, it looks like they have a seating capacity that is the same regardless of whether it's open or closed

Nice deal for the Sox but it is fair. He's older than I thought.

It won't matter. They will have stadium specific seating maximums that have nothing to do with the general provincial classifications of indoors vs outdoors. But the place is literally inside doors and the fact that it has a retractable roof does not mean it is outside.

Yeah you're wrong for sure. It'll just be considered indoors.

You have to drink bleach and then aggressively use a penis pump

As tempting as it is to drop your two cents on vaccination politics, science, morality, etc., please just don't. Even if you are RIGHT you are not changing anyone's opinion through this message board and this stuff has a demonstrated history of just derailing threads. Nobody really gives a s*** if you think vaccinations are bad. And even if you are an epidemiological doctor nobody here is going to get vaccinated because you tell them too.

What do you mean? Very much doubt whether or not the dome is open has any bearing on allowable fan count

I dunno, if everyone in hockey is dumb then maybe it could be valid to leave some of your better players exposed if they wouldn't get picked.

mmmmmm not sure about that being good news i see your point though

It is okay during sex, well at least in most jurisdictions. I will give you some helpful examples as far as I understand the law in Canada: - If you consent to play a sport and get hurt in the normal course of that sport, does your consent to playing make the person who hurt you safe from criminal charges? YES. No assault. It is in the public interest to allow this type of consent or "implied consent" for potential injury. - If you consent to a street fight and suffer bodily injury, does your consent make the other combatant safe from charges? NO. It is Assault. It is not in the public interest to allow this type of consent for injury. - If you consent to BDSM and the infliction of pain upon your body for sexual gratification, is the other participant safe from charges? UNCLEAR. Most analysts would agree that if consent was explicit for all acts and there was no non-superficial "bodily harm" then there would be no assault. Previous Supreme Court Cases actually would make you believe that rough sex is NOT in the public interest so you cannot consent to be harmed during sex, but a modern re-trying of those principles would probably find that to be bad/outdated legal opinion. - If you consent to being choked out and having vaginal sex performed on you while out, is the other participant liable? YES. This is assault under Canadian law. As soon as you lose the ability to withdraw consent at any moment, your consent is no longer valid. - If you consent to "rough sex" and a dick ends up in your butt while you are passed out and that sex act was never specified, is the other participant in trouble? OF COURSE. There is no "implied consent" for anal rape or any other sex acts, really.

bookmarking this masterpiece

yeah lmao f*** that

Zoo is already open but you have to buy tickets in advance. Going to take my spawn next week.

We will delete most strings of Covid debate that have nothing to do with baseball. It has nothing to do with the veracity of the posts. I'm not policing truth. It's just seen as political. In practice I tend to jump in when it becomes clear through a series of posts that the discussion has gone political. It's harder to pick out specific posts, harder to see where the line was crossed and the sports discussion thread was completely lost. And it's easier to identify when people are arguing or it starts to get a bit heated. We are imperfect. Please don't whine like a little bitch if you think it was unfair that your post got deleted and someone else's didn't. I don't even read most of Jim's posts. If I delete any of your posts it might be a quiet compliment because it means I read them.

Huh? Are they?

No he was kind of twiggy out of college

Last details = can Justin please throw out the first pitch at the first game back?

It ends with capitulation/acceptance by the government(s) of the new reality. Who knows when that happens in all of the different countries/states. We are already in a reality where certain places have laws and policies that are imagining a basically Covid19 free world (which is not true) and other places are still using laws and policies that are imagining a raging and unstoppable pandemic killing or maiming a large portion of the population (which is not true). It sucks, man. Who f***ing knows what happens in the next year.

Everyone in baseball is just vibrating with excitement at the opportunity to watch Eduardo Rodriguez toe the rubber for the team that didn't want to keep Mookie Betts, as they go head to head with the TBD pitcher from the 46-43 team that doesn't let their players grow beards and employs multiple domestic abusers.

Uhhhh can we talk about how f***ing stupid it is that there is ONE game today and it's a stinking Red Sox Yankees showcase? Wtf MLB. Go smell your own farts.

Damn, just realized my favourite prospect from their 2019 draft got released with no pro games. Nick Neal, the unit himself.

So then what is your projection for him? You think he's going to be a league average starter?

Jim is doing the long and confusing form of welch. The smokescreen welch.

Jim is the ultimate welcher