But can't the goal posts shift?
For the record I think Trout should get MVP if it was held today. And in general the player with the best war should also be the MVP... that's how it generally should work out. But I'm just arguing that it shouldn't have to.
Should a teams performance having anything to do with deciding MVP? Most on here would say no and loudly make fun of any old baseball writer that does take it into consideration. But I'm not so sure it should not mean at least something. If a bunch of a players WAR value comes from extra base hits he racks up in meaningless 5-1, 8-2 games, is it really value? If over the course of a year, 8 times Trout homers or triples in the 7th or 8th down 5 or 6 runs, while Donaldson singles or sac flies 8 times with walk-off wins. Of course Donaldson's contribution was more in those cases, but that would never show up in any WAR calculations. Of course my hypothetical never happened, but it is possible.
Then there other things. What if Trout was a club house cancer (he's not)? Sure club house cancers have won championships, but have they not also hurt teams as well? I would think so?
Anyway, that's all.